R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-10-2013, 02:16 PM   #5926
Tech Fanatic
 
Typeone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Fresno,Ca
Posts: 781
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default

Got the Smokem conversion in today we'll see how it works out on the track. Vincent from smokem said it makes the car transition from left to right a lot better and also more corner speed.
Attached Thumbnails
Tamiya TRF417-image.jpg  
Typeone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2013, 02:27 PM   #5927
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Typeone View Post
Got the Smokem conversion in today we'll see how it works out on the track. Vincent from smokem said it makes the car transition from left to right a lot better and also more corner speed.
awesome, mine's in the mail. should work well with my FX chassis i hope. let us know how you find it and any setup changes you made because of it.
theagentorange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2013, 02:30 PM   #5928
Tech Rookie
 
Robkitetop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by veecee View Post
I love how the interview borrows blocks of text from the smokem website, their redrc press release and emails. Nice work fella!
It is basically the same type of conversion as the Smokem so in my opion it's pretty normal that the discription is more or less the same. The conversion is looking good and I like how the capturing of the layshaft bearings is kept as original. With the Smokem conversion you need get the whole bulkhead off to get the layshaft out. For even more flex you can use the Sepes conversion with the Kentech Worlds Mod, which gives an extra tuning option.

With the Sepes conversion a little bit more expensive than the Smokem conversion, it's a close call on which one delivers more 'Bang for the buck'.

Still strange that the 418 conversion is mentioned as I doubt that the original car is already tested by Sepes Racing Products.

Maybe Chris can comment on this?
Robkitetop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2013, 03:16 PM   #5929
CL
Tech Addict
 
CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 687
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

So do we have to drill 2 holes near the motor mount for the Smokem conversion to fit a standard 417/X chassis?
__________________
Believe in yourself!
CL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2013, 04:10 PM   #5930
Tech Champion
 
CraigM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,009
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robkitetop View Post
The conversion is looking good and I like how the capturing of the layshaft bearings is kept as original. With the Smokem conversion you need get the whole bulkhead off to get the layshaft out. For even more flex you can use the Sepes conversion with the Kentech Worlds Mod, which gives an extra tuning option
That defeats half the purpose of the new style top deck and motor mount. With the screws over the layshaft the rear can't flex enough, but remove all the screws from the motor mount screw the flex point moves too far back.
__________________
www.facebook.com/mcpheerc
CraigM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2013, 05:54 PM   #5931
Tech Fanatic
 
Typeone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Fresno,Ca
Posts: 781
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default

I think you might have to cause there's pegs for the motor mount just like the TRF flaoting servo mount which cause it to not move. The V5 chassis and Smokem chassis have the holes already to mount.
Typeone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2013, 10:53 PM   #5932
CL
Tech Addict
 
CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 687
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Typeone View Post
I think you might have to cause there's pegs for the motor mount just like the TRF flaoting servo mount which cause it to not move. The V5 chassis and Smokem chassis have the holes already to mount.
Yeah, that's what I figured.
__________________
Believe in yourself!
CL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2013, 11:02 PM   #5933
Tech Master
 
OnRDPassion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West LA
Posts: 1,185
Trader Rating: 54 (100%+)
Default

I am intrigued to see how the smokem chassis does. I just got done with a weekend at a new track in SD with a V5 and the kentech mod and was alright... I will have the smokem before the next round and will be able to throw it on the car before.

What setup changes are people typically doing when switching over to the raceberry chassis?
__________________
Jay Williams
Xray RX8 2014
RC America - Protoform Racing - KO Propo USA - Kevco Racing / Picco EDO Modified - Byrons Fuels
OnRDPassion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 12:13 AM   #5934
Tech Fanatic
 
Typeone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Fresno,Ca
Posts: 781
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default

Question Jay on your set that you did for WCRCR with a 17.5 how did u like that set up and did u do any changes to that setup to improve it? Also how did the car handle with no spacers under the suspension mounts?
Typeone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 01:02 AM   #5935
Tech Rookie
 
Robkitetop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigM View Post
That defeats half the purpose of the new style top deck and motor mount. With the screws over the layshaft the rear can't flex enough, but remove all the screws from the motor mount screw the flex point moves too far back.
How is this different than the Smokem conversion? With the Kentech mod you only remove the screws of the layshaft. The Sepes conversion has the single post attached to the top deck just like the Smokem. So if you use the Sepes conversion (motormount and top deck) with the Kentech mod you get the same configuration.
Robkitetop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 04:00 AM   #5936
Tech Champion
 
CraigM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,009
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnRDPassion View Post
What setup changes are people typically doing when switching over to the raceberry chassis?
Just a longer rear wheelbase because the motor is further back with the Smokem V7 compared to the RB

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robkitetop View Post
How is this different than the Smokem conversion? With the Kentech mod you only remove the screws of the layshaft. The Sepes conversion has the single post attached to the top deck just like the Smokem. So if you use the Sepes conversion (motormount and top deck) with the Kentech mod you get the same configuration.
Kentech mod has no screws in the motor mount so the flex point is more or less in the middle of the car

Smokem conversion has only 1 top deck screw in the motor mount at the front which moves the flex point forward, but also lets the top deck to flex freely above and behind the layshaft like yokomo/raceberry

Sepes conversion (like 417) can't do that configuration easily, either it will be just like kentechs mod with the flex completely in the center or it will be like a standard 417 with the rear end very stiff

The best of all worlds is the 418, it has a captured layshaft so you can run it like the yoke/RB but also has screw holes over the layshaft to stiffen up the rear end if the track demands that
__________________
www.facebook.com/mcpheerc
CraigM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 04:42 AM   #5937
Tech Rookie
 
Robkitetop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigM View Post
Smokem conversion has only 1 top deck screw in the motor mount at the front which moves the flex point forward, but also lets the top deck to flex freely above and behind the layshaft like yokomo/raceberry

Sepes conversion (like 417) can't do that configuration easily, either it will be just like kentechs mod with the flex completely in the center or it will be like a standard 417 with the rear end very stiff
The Sepes conversion has the same single top deck screw in the motor mount as the Smokem conversion, you just have to put a spacer between the top deck and this front post to raise the top deck a little and execute the kentech conversion to have the same flex point as the Smokem conversion.

This is the stock Sepes configuration where you can see the single post:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=3&theater

This is the Smokem conversion which is the same configuration only with kentech mod build into the design:

http://www.redrc.net/2013/08/smokem-...v7-conversion/

Just sharing the right information as I think both conversions can work great with the 417 chassis.
Robkitetop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 08:09 AM   #5938
Tech Master
 
OnRDPassion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West LA
Posts: 1,185
Trader Rating: 54 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Typeone View Post
Question Jay on your set that you did for WCRCR with a 17.5 how did u like that set up and did u do any changes to that setup to improve it? Also how did the car handle with no spacers under the suspension mounts?
On my WCRCR setup I liked it quite a bit for 17.5 as it carried quite of corner speed. It was definitely a little bit on the twitchy side which caused the rear end to break loose to what I did was dial a little of the steering out by going from 6 to 5 on the front droop and then raising the front inner camber links 1mm. When I removed the rear spacers under the suspension mounts it made the rear end too planted and cause a little bit of a push.

Right now I am running the V5 with the Kentech mod for giving the car more flex and like it a lot more as it suits my driving style more. and quite a bit different of a set-up as I have been running a lot at outdoor asphalt tracks.
__________________
Jay Williams
Xray RX8 2014
RC America - Protoform Racing - KO Propo USA - Kevco Racing / Picco EDO Modified - Byrons Fuels
OnRDPassion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 08:12 AM   #5939
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: santa monica / manchester
Posts: 1,206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by veecee View Post
I love how the interview borrows blocks of text from the smokem website, their redrc press release and emails. Nice work fella!
I did the email interview with Chris and posted the answers, can you show me any of the info about him etc on the Facebook site? or are you implying that I made it up?
If the descriptions for the kit share any similarities with other text its nowt to do with me, but as has been mentioned the conversions are similar (although the devil is in the detail with racing) so that explains why the wording is similar.

The cool thing is that there is a seasoned racer who is also a product designer and he is making a range of new parts for the cars we race contributing to our hobby, you are welcome to help contribute as well

I am looking forward to seeing what the conversion is like on the track, I am a fan of all these new parts, keeps it interesting seeing the Raceberry, Smokem etc but its always good to have more people throwing their ideas into the mix.
__________________
http://www.theRcRacer.com/

TRF419, TBEvo6, TT02, VDF, TRF501x, TRF201, TRF101, Mi5, X-Ray T4-13, BD7 2014, A700 Evo, WR-02G

Last edited by Qatmix; 09-11-2013 at 02:40 PM.
Qatmix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2013, 11:30 AM   #5940
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ashland city tn
Posts: 2,564
Trader Rating: 50 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qatmix View Post
Just for your information, I did the interview with Chris and posted the answers, if it has similarities with other text its nowt to do with me but the conversions are similar (although the devil is in the detail with racing) so that explains why the wording is similar. I just posted what I was sent. I was just helping raise the profile of a new guy building and contributing to our racing scene, and I am looking forward to seeing what the conversion is like on the track.
Good have him start working on a TB04pro chassis conversion!
__________________
Rick Hess
R&C Hobby Shop Clarksville TN
-RCJuice-HobbyStar-RCP Customs
rkhess is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Saudi Arabia RC Club grizzle Manila Racers 6558 01-06-2017 09:50 AM
Tamiya TRF415 JDM_DOHC_SiR Electric On-Road 21094 03-10-2016 12:02 PM
Tamiya TRF416 / TRF416WE / TRF416X academygaz Electric On-Road 10619 01-01-2015 04:36 PM
Tamiya TA05 IFS rcforum Electric On-Road 1132 12-18-2014 06:19 AM
"Ask" Jilles Groskamp Tamiya 416 & 417, Team Orion Motors JGH Electric On-Road 1996 05-27-2014 07:28 AM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 03:14 AM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0