Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Associated TC6 Thread >

Team Associated TC6 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree20Likes

Team Associated TC6 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2011, 12:52 AM
  #1966  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
nitro rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,130
Trader Rating: 5 (86%+)
Default

i Think this will be the car to buy
Hopefully its good on low traction asphalt
nitro rat is offline  
Old 03-07-2011, 10:11 PM
  #1967  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (67)
 
BlackedOutREVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,791
Trader Rating: 67 (100%+)
Default

Will have it finished soon and post a completed pic, but for now

BlackedOutREVO is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 01:05 AM
  #1968  
Tech Master
 
daleburr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 1,090
Default

Is everyone else (including the AE team drivers) running the standard servo saver spring?

It seems very soft to me, I'm tempted to try one off another car. Tightening the nut up doesn't really help; this just reduces the travel rather than making it much stiffer.
daleburr is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 01:21 AM
  #1969  
Tech Adept
 
Redwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 188
Default

Hi guys,

I have had my TC6 now since the Euro release back in November (I think) but held off my initial impressions until I had sufficient track time to judge it.

Now after my first big event last Sunday I can safely say that this car is truly excellent.

I ran a TC5 for 2 years and eventually got it setup so that it did approximately what I told it, however I never felt 100% confident in it and it always seemed to lack rear grip.

So then I got the TC6 and set it up in kit settings and took it out at my local club where we run rubber tyres on carpet with no additive. I immediately felt like it had better corner speed but the lack of rear grip was still there! I turned my steering down on the transmitter and it was better but still tended to break rear traction on high speed corners.

I then changed to Keven Heberts setup, but with a long rear upper camber link as I like the long link, and felt it was probably the main factor in the increased corner speeds. I actually felt this setup felt pretty similar to the kit setting, with still too little rear grip, so I went for the shorter rear camber link - NOTE: If you want to use the 6 holes on the shock tower then you need a different turnbuckle than the kit one, you cannot make the kit version short enough, major pain. - This was immediately better.

I still wasn't that happy, so I decided to try Olly Jefferies' setup, as he has been tearing up the UK scene with his TC6. The main differences seem to be 6 degrees castor - NOTE: 6 degree C hubs do not come with the kit, you have to buy these - and an angled front wishbone to compensate. He also uses the shorter rear camber link. This setup is amazing in my opinion, it suits my driving extremely well too, the corner speed is amazing, initial turn in is so direct and the rear is planted.

With this setup I have probably found a few tenths over my TC5, maybe even 0.5s. Sheer lap speed is nice but the best thing is probably the consistency this car has, you can turn your fastest lap every lap, it is just so smooth and reliable, you can easily improve your times by 10s over 5 minutes with this over a TC5.

I currently run diff front and rear (ball diffs), as the kit comes with enough parts to make 2 diffs, or one ball, one slipper however if you want to run a spool I think this setup will be just as good, since there is so much turn in, you can afford to lose some with the spool.

The setup is here: http://www.cmldistribution.co.uk/pro...lly_ardent.pdf

If you have a TC5 and are thinking of making the switch, don't delay! You will be a couple of positions better off I can guarantee it!

Well done associated, the car doesn't look so much different, and I don't have to buy a new box of spares but it sure can go some.

Regards

Neal
Redwood is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 03:40 AM
  #1970  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (141)
 
hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vic, Australia
Posts: 3,140
Trader Rating: 141 (100%+)
Default

I dont understand how shortening the rear camber link would improve your rear traction problem.
hacker is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 06:49 AM
  #1971  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by Redwood
Hi guys,
I still wasn't that happy, so I decided to try Olly Jefferies' setup, as he has been tearing up the UK scene with his TC6. The main differences seem to be 6 degrees castor - NOTE: 6 degree C hubs do not come with the kit, you have to buy these - and an angled front wishbone to compensate. He also uses the shorter rear camber link. This setup is amazing in my opinion, it suits my driving extremely well too, the corner speed is amazing, initial turn in is so direct and the rear is planted.

Neal
Did you try this setup (6deg caster,shorter rear camber link) on your TC5?
Any improvement as TC6?
mos-leung is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 06:51 AM
  #1972  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
wtcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,031
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

A shorter link generates an increased camber if the tire moves upwards. This effect can stabilize the rear of the car if the camber increases to a value that enlarges the area where the tire touches the ground .
wtcc is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 07:10 AM
  #1973  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
jag88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,156
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by daleburr
Is everyone else (including the AE team drivers) running the standard servo saver spring?

It seems very soft to me, I'm tempted to try one off another car. Tightening the nut up doesn't really help; this just reduces the travel rather than making it much stiffer.
I felt the same way and removed the spring and put an Associated servo saver ( pt#25162, XP/Futaba) on the servo.
jag88 is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 08:41 AM
  #1974  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (141)
 
hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vic, Australia
Posts: 3,140
Trader Rating: 141 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by wtcc
A shorter link generates an increased camber if the tire moves upwards. This effect can stabilize the rear of the car if the camber increases to a value that enlarges the area where the tire touches the ground .
I always go for a shorter camber link to make cars rotate more, less rear grip.

and below also is what I have in my secret stash
Attached Thumbnails Team Associated TC6 Thread-clink.jpg   Team Associated TC6 Thread-clink2hl.jpg  

Last edited by hacker; 03-08-2011 at 08:51 AM. Reason: pics added
hacker is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 08:52 AM
  #1975  
Tech Adept
 
Redwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 188
Default

Originally Posted by hacker
I dont understand how shortening the rear camber link would improve your rear traction problem.
You are right that a shorter link doesn't directly give you more grip but a more angled link will change the roll centre and give more grip. If you want to run the long links on a TC6 then you have to add shims to the outer ballstud to get the angle. To get enough grip you need to add about 5mm like in Christer Andersson's setup, however with 5mm of shims under the ballstud it will rub on the wheels so you have to widen the car with hex spacers. My wheels meant that this wasn't possible so I stayed with 3mm shims and went to a shorter link, increasing the angle and rear grip.

Also as said, a shorter upper link gives you more reactive camber, but too short and you get too much camber in the corner and lose grip again.

Regards

Neal
Redwood is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 09:03 AM
  #1976  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (141)
 
hacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vic, Australia
Posts: 3,140
Trader Rating: 141 (100%+)
Default

I guess whatever works for you. I'm not 2nd guessing anyone, I have alot to learn in regards of setup. Just didnt sound right, to me that is. But setting up is half the fun, and its great with forums like these, ideas and experience can all be shared.

have fun!
hacker is offline  
Old 03-08-2011, 02:42 PM
  #1977  
Tech Adept
 
S_fender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dijon, France
Posts: 172
Default

Hi,

A little question for Rick or anyone who can answer at associated :
It seems that the ackerman table on page 23 isn't correct. Where can i found the correct table (not found on Asso web site).

Thank you
Sébastien.
S_fender is offline  
Old 03-09-2011, 10:00 AM
  #1978  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Brasilia- Brasil
Posts: 5
Default links tc6

BUCKAROO,
which marks short of the links you bought? was of the tc5 ?


Got a chance to run my TC6 tonight. Only had a busted LTC-R body to run, so I made do. I'm running the Herbert Indoor Champs set up, mostly. Still running the long camber links, black ball studs, and using a #2 piston and 40 weight oil as kit parts until my short links, silver ball studs, and blank piston arrive. Got me a new Boss 17.5 and a Tekin RS. Rolling Sorex 24s.
zaranza is offline  
Old 03-09-2011, 10:05 AM
  #1979  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 172
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

What would be the best gear diff that I can buy for my Tc6
f1o7x9 is offline  
Old 03-09-2011, 10:33 AM
  #1980  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 586
Default

Originally Posted by zaranza
BUCKAROO,
which marks short of the links you bought? was of the tc5 ?
I think you can use these:
FT Blue Titanium Turnbuckles, 1.375"/35mm
jorgesimes is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.