Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree6280Likes

USGT

    Hide Wikipost
Old 08-12-2017, 12:28 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: USGT
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: DARKSIDE
USIC USGT 2016 Motor and Chassis list in qualifing order

TQ A.F. TSR A800
2nd D.J. TeamPowers A800
3rd B.S. TSR A800
4th M.L. TSR A800
5th M.F TeamPowers A800
6th D.J TSR Destiny
7th J.W. Trinity Monster '17 Xray
8th C.V TSR Destiny
9 A.C. TSR A700
10 B.K. R1 v15 A700
11
12
13 J.L. TSR A800
14 M.L. TSR Destiny
15
16 J.M. TSR. 15 Xray
17
18 R.C. TSR T4
19 M.K. Reedy Powered M3 AE TC7
20 S.J. TSR Destiny
21
22 E.S. motiv T4
23
24
25
26 P.D. TSR Destiny
27
28
29
30 V.P. Reedy M3 serpent 3.0
31
32
33
34
35 Y.B. Fantom A800
36
37
38 R.C. TSR A800
39
40 W.S. Reedy
41
42
43 Motiv xray
44
45
46 Motiv Xray
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2014, 07:04 PM
  #2341  
Tech Master
iTrader: (46)
 
Travis S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Moline, IL
Posts: 1,374
Trader Rating: 46 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by MikeR
The body fit on my TB04 with no issues. It had plenty of room for the stand up front shocks.
The body came in a TA05-IFS kit so I "assumed" it would only work on IFS, short shocks type chassis. I thought the TB04 has the shorter socks and lower sock towers.
Travis S is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 07:11 PM
  #2342  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (32)
 
Kevin K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: In a land of mini-mighty mental giants
Posts: 8,854
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Travis S
I thought the TB04 has the shorter socks and lower sock towers.
It does much like the T4 14 the body should fit just fine with the lower stock shocks and towers.
Kevin K is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 07:20 PM
  #2343  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (5)
 
wiscR56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Franklin, WI
Posts: 229
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

I guess everyone has their own interpretations to what bodies are or should be legal as the rules are left pretty open. What I like is that there is a good variety of bodies that people use. Being a motorsport fan myself, I interpret the rules specifically to GT racing. I try to use bodies that have or currently compete in sanctioned GT series: GT300/GT500, GT Lemans, DTM, FIA GT3, Blancpain, etc. At the same time encouraging race liveries and discouraging prototype (i.e Daytona Prototypes/LMP1) and non GT cars. Just my opinion.
wiscR56 is offline  
Old 03-22-2014, 01:11 PM
  #2344  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Brian McGreevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,081
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Brian McGreevy
Added rear shots.

Lexus definitely has a DTM car look to it. We'll see how it works!
I like it. More front end grip but also more stable than the GT-R. Rotates well.
Brian McGreevy is offline  
Old 03-22-2014, 11:41 PM
  #2345  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (32)
 
Kevin K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: In a land of mini-mighty mental giants
Posts: 8,854
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DARKSIDE
hey Robk and Kevin you guys should look at these as a template for legal bodies...

this is a good list imo
Both Rob and I dont see the need for a body list for this class.

All the bodies in these pictures are made by Tamiya for the most part....so we could make it Tamiya bodies only? But then the price would be crazy and it would drive some people nuts Im sure.

Maybe a better rule is one that states that the body must be a "licensed" body? The problem with this is that it cuts out some body makers that dont pay for the naming rights on the body.

The rules are fine the way they are IMO people are always looking to pushing the limits with the body design but look at all the larger races none of them were won with a body that was questionable. Most everyone gets it I dont see it being that big of a problem. We have tested some of these gray area bodies and guess what they are not any better then "legal" bodies so really if someone wants to run a WGT body with shocks sticking out the hood well then that person is looking for some magical pixie dust to help him get to the front. It seems like some people want to create trouble where there is none....look at the guys looking for new motors in VTA...lol.
Kevin K is offline  
Old 03-23-2014, 07:58 AM
  #2346  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 9,619
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

good point....
DARKSIDE is offline  
Old 03-23-2014, 08:06 AM
  #2347  
Tech Master
 
moparSRT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Tampa Bay FL
Posts: 1,685
Default

I agree ...
moparSRT is offline  
Old 03-23-2014, 09:24 PM
  #2348  
Tech Champion
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,201
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

" However, Can AM or IMSA style bodies, similar to 1/12 or 1/8 bodies are also discouraged"

So no IMSA Nissan.......

Really, I can probably add a No WGT body exclusion to the rules.

I'm not sure what won our series race today. A Camaro was TQ, either a Tamiya Nissan GTR or Toyata MR2 won I think. Lotus, LExus, the infamous Shaken car, and maybe even a Silvia were in the main.

Like Kevin said, there is no magical body. Some work better than others on certain tracks, but there is a wide range of stuff that works. It's really all about running cool bodies.
robk is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 04:27 AM
  #2349  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Elyria, Oh
Posts: 928
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Anything on a new Corvette?
mackin is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 05:14 AM
  #2350  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indianapolis give or take...
Posts: 659
Default

People keep talking about what won at a given race and whether or not there is an aero advantage... that's not the only consideration.

Simple question..., is there a "look" based aspect to the rule or not? If not, just say no LTC-Rs and be done with it.

I'm sorry, I mean no offense, but words like "are discouraged" don't belong in a rule book. Rules should be black and white if at all possible. "Discouraged" is the grayest of the gray.
.crispy is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 05:30 AM
  #2351  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
liljohn1064's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deerfield, WI
Posts: 5,919
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

First USGT race for me ever this weekend. New to me T3'12, new tires and Protoform LFA body. The car handled great and I had a blast. I may never finish on the podium, but I had a nice clean race with some very good sportsmen. I think this is another class I can sink my teeth into.
liljohn1064 is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 05:32 AM
  #2352  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 6,194
Trader Rating: 33 (97%+)
Default

Originally Posted by .crispy
"Discouraged" is the grayest of the gray.
"Discouraged" means "Oh let me go try that body out to see why it's discouraged to see if I can get an advantage with it!"
billdelong is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 07:06 AM
  #2353  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (54)
 
CSeils's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 890
Trader Rating: 54 (100%+)
Default This is not a FDR question. :)

Just curious about motor timing. I have a new Thunder Power 21.5 with a FDR of 3.87 in my vehicle. The car seemed set up correctly for the infield, but I was definitely slow on the straight. I am figuring that the gear ratio is good but what about the timing on the motor? I moved from 20° to 30°. Temps at 30° were around 140°-150°

What suggestions would everyone have about a starting point for timing? Or should I just gear it higher?

Thanks
CSeils is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 08:38 AM
  #2354  
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
vivo quevas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central, Ca.
Posts: 1,351
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by CSeils
Just curious about motor timing. I have a new Thunder Power 21.5 with a FDR of 3.87 in my vehicle. The car seemed set up correctly for the infield, but I was definitely slow on the straight. I am figuring that the gear ratio is good but what about the timing on the motor? I moved from 20° to 30°. Temps at 30° were around 140°-150°

What suggestions would everyone have about a starting point for timing? Or should I just gear it higher

Thanks
On TP motors you shouldn't run the timing past 35* and they need to be geared much hirer. How long of track do you run on? Some of the TP motors I have seen are missiles and some are just average it is a crap shoot with 21.5 TP motors if you have a good one you will love how fast they go. IMHO
vivo quevas is offline  
Old 03-24-2014, 09:25 AM
  #2355  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 9,619
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I like to think if anybody has a body in question...post a pic and let everyone look at it..

For Thunder/Nashville Im more of make sure its a real car type guy...must have rear bumper ect...something that I would see rolling in my hood...or Tom Cruise hood at least lol

there are a lot of bodies that fit this class...pick one and enjoy....
DARKSIDE is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.