R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

    Hide Wikipost
Old 11-29-2016, 12:48 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech Forums Thread Wiki: USGT
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: jlfx car audio
USIC USGT 2016 Motor and Chassis list

TQ A.F. TSR A800
2nd D.J. TeamPowers A800
3rd B.S. TSR A800
4th M.L. TSR A800
5th M.F TeamPowers A800
6th D.J TSR Destiny
7th J.W. Trinity Monster '17 Xray
8th C.V TSR Destiny
9 A.C. TSR A700
10 B.K. R1 v15 A700
11
12
13 J.L. TSR A800
14 M.L. TSR Destiny
15
16
17
18 R.C. TSR T4
19
20 S.J. TSR Destiny
21
22 E.S. motiv T4
23
24
25
26 P.D. TSR Destiny
27
28
29
30 V.P. Reedy M3 serpent 3.0
31
32
33
34
35 Y.B. Fantom A800
36
37
38 R.C. TSR A800
39
40 W.S. Reedy
41
42
43 Motiv xray
44
45
46 Motiv Xray
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55

Print Wikipost

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-01-2011, 06:09 PM   #151
Tech Champion
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 7,643
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyintrtle View Post
Did HPI not udate their website to say that boost was allowed with the 17.5 motors?? Isn't this where we are getting the rules from for the RCGT class?

Love the idea of trying out different treaded tires as USGT would allow but do not want to go out & purchase a 21.5 motor for it. If non boosted 17.5 is to fast for a beginer then what were people starting out with in the 27 turn brushed motor as stock days?? Since the non boosted 17.5's are supposed to be the equivalent of 27 turns how is that all of a sudden to fast for people?
I would like to run 17.5 stock as well...in RCGT form...which is what I already do against the TC class...but like any class, we have rules...and they are 21.5 motors with ROAR or USVTA esc....so I put my 21.5 stator back in my car and Im getting ready for the Nats...that simple...

the rules are what they are...and upward knows I dont always agree with Rob...but its the National rules , and I travel...so its better for everyone in the long run...

and as far as fast?....it depends..some ppl running 17.5 TC with non boosted need to be in VTA...and barely USGT...just a fact

also its NOT RCGT...its USGT....
__________________
Myron "BATTMAN" Kinnard
Team Associated/Reedy Powered/PROTOform/RockStar Paint, LLC
THUNDER JAM IX Snowbirds Warm-up
January 2017
Thunder RC Raceway
DARKSIDE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 06:18 PM   #152
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 516
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DARKSIDE View Post
I would like to run 17.5 stock as well...in RCGT form...which is what I already do against the TC class...but like any class, we have rules...and they are 21.5 motors with ROAR or USVTA esc....so I putr my 21.5 stator back in my car and getting ready for the Nats...that simple...

the rules are what they are...and upward knows I dont always agree with Rob...but its the National rules , and I travel...so its better for everyone in the long run...

and as far as fast?....it depends..some ppl running TC with non boosted need to be in VTA...and barely USGT...just a fact
So you don't know if HPI just never updated their website to allow boost in RCGT, or when non boosted 17.5s became to fast for people?

I'm all for rules but I will be sticking with RCGT since it makes no sense for me to go out & purchase a 21.5 motor, & it's basically the same class.

Not sure about your fact since it didn't quite make sense to me, maybe someone else understood what you were getting at. Oh & I know that it's USGT, that's what the thread title says it is.
flyintrtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 06:19 PM   #153
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY&FL
Posts: 3,359
Trader Rating: 24 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squarehead View Post
First, this class is replicating GT cars, not touring cars. Only recently Speed World Challenge cars started using slicks because of a change in sponsorhip of the series from Toyo to Pirelli. There are still a few of the GT-style racing series using DOT competition tires. This is a silly argument.

Second, why would you want to be in a class that you didn't like the rules, and why would you attempt to try to change the rules of a class just to suit your whims? Still, in 2011, this is the single biggest problem with RC car racing in this country—people who can't conform to a class structure, but feel the need to change and alter things on a local level so that they are happy.

So you feel this is a touchy enough subject that you have a never-used screen name just to blather on about slicks and the history of touring cars, and you can't use your real name to express an opinion. Is anyone supposed to take you seriously?

HPI created this class based on their treaded spec tires, realistic bodies, slower speeds and a whole different atmosphere from what has become the norm in R/C road racing. It's a good, solid concept—just like VTA—and it works for a lot more people than the few who get disgruntled by "non racing parts" like treaded tires.

The number of people flocking to these classes over the last few years tells me that those racers who continue to push for gummy slicks, dish wheels, ambiguous bodies, open electronics and faster speeds are the people becoming the minority in racing today.

And that's a great thing in my book.
Just re-read this.....Damn you said it good !!!!
Evoracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 06:25 PM   #154
Tech Elite
 
squarehead's Avatar
R/C Tech Charter Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
Posts: 4,210
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to squarehead Send a message via MSN to squarehead Send a message via Yahoo to squarehead Send a message via Skype™ to squarehead
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyintrtle
Since the non boosted 17.5's are supposed to be the equivalent of 27 turns how is that all of a sudden to fast for people?
Many people would argue that 27t "stock" motors had become too fast, as it was. Stock class (on road) stopped being an entry level class about 15 years ago.
__________________
Everything depends.
Nothing is always.
Everything is sometimes.
squarehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 06:33 PM   #155
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 516
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squarehead View Post
Many people would argue that 27t "stock" motors had become too fast, as it was. Stock class (on road) stopped being an entry level class about 15 years ago.
I'll give you that, people love to argue. Some of the original ideas for this class was to keep 17.5 non boosted from RCGT. Someone brought up that RCGT became boosted, my question is when did this happen & or is it that HPI just did not update their website to reflect this. Robk said that was the reason why he wanted 21.5.
flyintrtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 06:55 PM   #156
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY&FL
Posts: 3,359
Trader Rating: 24 (100%+)
Default

I think you'll find that RCGT is basically a dead issue. The program was the brain child of Andy H at HPI and a few folks in the California rc community. Once that association fell apart , RCGT just languished and continues to do so. Highly doubtful you'll see any update to the rules since RCGT barely exists anywhere , much less in it's original California birth place.
Evoracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 07:15 PM   #157
Tech Champion
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,043
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squarehead View Post
Second, why would you want to be in a class that you didn't like the rules, and why would you attempt to try to change the rules of a class just to suit your whims? Still, in 2011, this is the single biggest problem with RC car racing in this country—people who can't conform to a class structure, but feel the need to change and alter things on a local level so that they are happy.
Doug, & RobK. I know that it has been three years since I was this guy. (Please see paragraph above) Somehow I feel a fresh need to apologize for it. All I can say is that I am glad that its someone else giving you the attitude and not me.

I am not saying that a little rule bending for a local club race is not ok. I really think that its not a big deal if Joes Shade Tree Racing club in BFE wants to allow Corvette, Pantera or even 2010 Camaro's in VTA, or if they run an overall hybrid of VTA and RCGT rules, but the purpose of a National rule set is uniformity and continuity from Club to club, state to state and it looks like maybe even internationally. That rule set serves as a standard. It says that if I prep my car this way, then I can go here, here, or there and my car will be legal and competitive. I thank you for that standard of rules, and for the tough changes you have made to it through the years.(VTA and now USGT) I know that the rule changes have often passed like kidney stones. I think the USGT is a great idea and a great chance of capturing what HPI had in mind when they launched the RCGT format.
__________________
www.battlefieldraceway.com Racing videos at http://www.youtube.com/snoopyrc
snoopyrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 08:13 PM   #158
Tech Master
 
f1larry's Avatar
R/C Tech Charter Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Buffalo Grove, IL
Posts: 1,664
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to f1larry
Default

I think part of the reason for USGT to be non boosted 21.5 is to give a natural progression up the power level.

VTA 25.5 non boost Vintage bodies
USGT 21.5 non boost Modern GT bodies
Stock TC 17.5 non boost TC bodies
Expert Stock TC 17.5 boost TC bodies

Makes sense to me and gives structured classes that anyone can find a place to race in. Also gives consistency between tracks.
__________________
Tamiya TRF 415|TA05 v2|TA05|TL01RA|TL01|M05|M06|F104 Pro|F103RM|RM-01|RM Mk.5
Custom Racing Stickers
2012 TCS Race #170 "The Track" @ Harbor Hobby Best of Show Mini Pro
f1larry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 08:43 PM   #159
Tech Champion
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 7,402
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Why 21.5? Everyone was burning the tires off the cars in a rapid fashion with boost and 17.5. Even spec 17.5 is not going to get any slower.

Just go and find some of the old RCGT threads or some of the California racing threads from a year ago. RCGT was white hot for a minute and then it all went away.
__________________
A mutually re-enforcing cascade of failure

"Failior [sic] crowns enterprise." Robert Goddard

I-Lap Scoring Systems http://www.rclapcounter.com/
robk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 08:48 PM   #160
Tech Champion
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,043
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Its a good formula Rob. I know you dont need me to tell you to stick to your guns, but you are not wrong. Besides there are plenty of ways to splatter a $500 piece of carbon fiber without adding this one to it.
__________________
www.battlefieldraceway.com Racing videos at http://www.youtube.com/snoopyrc
snoopyrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 09:00 PM   #161
Tech Elite
 
squarehead's Avatar
R/C Tech Charter Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
Posts: 4,210
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to squarehead Send a message via MSN to squarehead Send a message via Yahoo to squarehead Send a message via Skype™ to squarehead
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snoopyrc View Post
Doug, & RobK. I know that it has been three years since I was this guy. (Please see paragraph above) Somehow I feel a fresh need to apologize for it. All I can say is that I am glad that its someone else giving you the attitude and not me.
Kent, it's all good. I think after you see the trends come and go and watch wave after wave of new product for almost 3 decades in this hobby, you get a perspective on R/C racing as a hobby that few people really understand. Rob and I have been collectively racing these stupid things for more than 50 years combined! Stuff comes and goes and speeds increase to the point that few can really drive them well, and yet people wonder why there are so few new racers, or why on road racing seems to be floundering.

I know it sounds grumpy to wax rhapsodic about the "good old days," but there was something really appealing about going to a race with 3 or 4 classes (or even TWO!), and knowing that the car you are bringing to the track was not only legal everywhere in the country, but that your class would be full down to the G or H mains—or even further! It was something to start at the bottom and gradually improve enough to move up to the B or C mains, and then get yourself into the A in Stock class at the local race track. It took a lot of practice and work, and it wasn't easy—but it sure felt good.

Today, most people would rather be in the A main, even if there were only 5 cars in their class. It just doesn't make sense to me why people would want so many classes to spread out small car counts to virtually nothing across the board. I really missed those days of 65 cars in 1/12th stock and 45 in 1/12th mod at the local club track. VTA really brought back a LOT of that 1987 feel to racing again for me, and a lot of other people—which is why it has been so popular for the last few years.

I think a race day with VTA, USGT and Pro Rubber (17.5t boosted) could bring all of that feeling back to on road racing if it was done correctly, and I really do believe that Rob has the right concept going with the Scale Nationals format this year.

I think if more people could get to run in a class with 30, 40 or 50+ cars each race day, they probably wouldn't be so concerned with rules minutiae and would just focus on racing, having fun and getting better.



That's just me, though.
__________________
Everything depends.
Nothing is always.
Everything is sometimes.
squarehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 02:40 AM   #162
Tech Adept
 
AeRacer805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posts: 198
Default

Driver Qual# Laps Race Time Round Race Pos in Race Fast Lap
Barry, Josh 22 6:17.031 2 6 1 16.235
Bray, Steve 21 6:03.665 2 7 1 16.787
Smith, mike 21 6:10.295 2 7 2 16.601
Barnes, Charlie 21 6:10.375 2 7 3 16.326
Le, Calvin 21 6:15.860 2 7 4 16.651
Miller, Randy 20 6:02.324 1 6 2 16.968
McBeth, Jim 20 6:04.516 1 6 3 16.866
Vargen, Glenn 20 6:16.382 1 7 3 18.032
Criger, Lee 19 6:02.505 2 6 3 17.488
Scheumaker, Mike 19 6:17.944 1 6 4 18.188

This is the top ten after two rounds at our track in Camarillo, Ca last Sunday.
This shows a great mix of drivers some of whom have been racing for 30+ years and some who have only raced for 2 years. The top three ran Solaris spec tires 4 and 5 ran X-pattern tires, I think the rest also ran Solaris tires.
21.5 non-boosted is working at our track. I almost forgot to mention that there was a 7 car B-Main
__________________
"When you are not practicing someone else is and when you meet that person they will beat you."

TC6, Top Photon, B4.1, SC10 FT, Orion Motors and Servos, Tekin RS
AeRacer805 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 05:27 AM   #163
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 289
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

One of the reasons I love this thread and the USVTA thread is the depth of knowledge, experience and insight that gets passed along. Squarehead makes some good points but I feel the need to expand on it a bit.

Today, racing is pretty expensive. It's tough to get someone to drop $500-$1000 to get started in what is essentially grown men playing with toy cars. Numbers are down at many tracks and race directors are trying to make it easy for people to get on the track with minimal expense. To that end, tracks do stuff like "three cars makes a class." As soon as you open it up like this, the classes are going to get diluted. Everyone who has a "better" idea will talk up his idea with other racers in an attempt to get two more people to run what he wants to run. I know. I've done it. This solution is a double edged sword. It does get people on the track but it also results in the situation that Squarehead waxes on about.

I have a full scale dirt track near my house. I spend most of my Friday nights in the summer there. They have four classes. It's been that way for ever. The rules change when needed to keep things safe but for all practical purposes, they are the same as they were 30 years ago. The most popular class is Modified. The drivers will tell you that what they love about it is that the rules never change so they know what to expect and they don't have to go out and buy new stuff all the time. Also, they can take their car to any track and race it.

Our race directors have to run their tracks like this. You guys know what works and what doesn't work yet you allow the new guys to decide what happens at your track. Be the benevolent dictator. Come up with some classes and stick with them. This is just about perfect!

VTA 25.5 non boost Vintage bodies
USGT 21.5 non boost Modern GT bodies
Stock TC 17.5 non boost TC bodies
Expert Stock TC 17.5 boost TC bodies


Now, racers can use it like a menu. They can look at the rules, their equipment, skill level and financial situation and decide what classes to run. If they decide to visit another track, they know their car is legal there.

I admire how Robk runs USVTA and USGT. His attitude seems to be "I know what's best for this class and these rules are the rules, deal with it." It may seem kind of harsh but in the long run it's good for all of us. If more race directors did the same thing, I think we could get back to those "good old days."
woodys3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 04:51 PM   #164
Tech Champion
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 7,643
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Well Ive finished my USGT car...again....rebuilt my TC5r 17.5 car....got the GTB2 installed, put 21.5 stator in, and put the cheaper HPI pre-mounts x-patterns on...now lets go race it .....

FYI...the GTB2...took just as much space as the Tekin I removed...no adjustments on the chassis other than wire..and the smaller cap is great too
__________________
Myron "BATTMAN" Kinnard
Team Associated/Reedy Powered/PROTOform/RockStar Paint, LLC
THUNDER JAM IX Snowbirds Warm-up
January 2017
Thunder RC Raceway
DARKSIDE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2011, 09:24 AM   #165
Tech Elite
 
reenmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Studio City, CA
Posts: 2,539
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

23 entries in Super GT+ at our regular club race last Sunday. 21.5 GT racing is taking hold!
__________________
Pete Waydo
2010 Big Fat Turkey Race Mini Cooper AAA Main Champion
*** currently in stasis ***
reenmachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pro 10: 235mm Le Mans Prototype Pan Car Discussion liljohn1064 Electric On-Road 3954 Today 12:24 PM
U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing squarehead Electric On-Road 14187 03-21-2012 02:43 PM
Drifting mr4tcsdrifter Colorado Racing 2678 11-01-2011 10:34 PM
RC GT Open str8.krooked Colorado Racing 49 04-28-2009 10:24 PM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 03:28 PM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0