Tamiya TA05 - VDF
#31
another discontinued chassis from tamiya.
#32
Tech Master
The chassis is a limited run chassis. The whole point is that there won't be an indefinite supply. The parts are still available (also many shared with other Tamiya kits) plus they might make another batch.
#33
I think they might release another batch like the other limited chassis.
Anyway, they are losing 1 good client like me lol. (More Demand - Limit Supply)
I plan to have CS Drift Chassis - Belt. So I aim to Yokomo DRB.
Anyway, they are losing 1 good client like me lol. (More Demand - Limit Supply)
I plan to have CS Drift Chassis - Belt. So I aim to Yokomo DRB.
#34
Even though it's limited run, this kind of kit doesn't have much collector value. We sold couple at the store, but both became shelf-queen.
#35
#36
if ur in the United States good luck with yokomo. it's as uncommon as a limited run tamiya chassis.
#37
Because Tamiya spare part are easily to get than the other.
#38
Chassis reminds me of my old RCLab 7evo7...I swear...history repeats itself.
#40
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
Sup dudes,
Please forgive me if this question is not suitable but despite the fact this is especially a drift chassis what's the chances of using the VDF up against the top dogs like T3, TCX etc. Since Tamiya is coming out with the gold edition soon I'm very tempted. I'm still new to this hobby and from my knowledge the VDF actually looks a lot more balanced than the expensive TCs. The only gripe I have with the VDF from pictures is that work space looks very limited.
Thanks
Please forgive me if this question is not suitable but despite the fact this is especially a drift chassis what's the chances of using the VDF up against the top dogs like T3, TCX etc. Since Tamiya is coming out with the gold edition soon I'm very tempted. I'm still new to this hobby and from my knowledge the VDF actually looks a lot more balanced than the expensive TCs. The only gripe I have with the VDF from pictures is that work space looks very limited.
Thanks
Last edited by unknownmember; 03-22-2011 at 02:04 AM. Reason: Typo
#41