R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

    Hide Wikipost
Old 09-21-2017, 01:26 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech Forums Thread Wiki: 1/12 forum
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: DesertRat
This is a place to share knowledge related to 1/12th scale racing. It is not to be used for conversations.

KITS:
Click links to go to manufacturer product page. If any are missing please add them!

TIRES:
Pre-mounted tires readily available in the US:
Pre-mounted tires readily available in the Europe:
  • Hot Race ??

Gluing your own donuts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm7z1rz-74s - Special thanks to Edward Pickering!
Truing tires:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wqHOLWq6Uc - Special thanks to Edward Pickering!

The following information came from HERE, with some editing and information added. Thanks Christian!

THIS MAY NEED UPDATING FOR THE NEW BLACK CRC CARPET

Brands:
BSR, CRC, Jaco:
Pro One is no longer selling to the public, but it and the brands above are all mounted by BSR and use the same foam. The nomenclature of the BSR vs Jaco/CRC is a little different in a few instances but is otherwise the same. The BSR foam consists of three families, and can be identifed as synthetics, naturals, and blends.

Synthetics - The old school, light weight, easy to true "dry feeling" tires. These include tires like CRC/Jaco Yellow (BSR White), Black, Gray, etc. These tires offer the highest wear rate and lowest grip. Many racers continue to use these nder high bite conditions.

Naturals - These tires are usually the best alternative for low bite and asphalt. They include Pink, Magenta, Double Pink, Lilac (BSR Team Purple), Purple, and other tires. These tires provide a ton of grip, but tend to get sticky in high bite conditions. This rubber does not wear as easily, and the cars will pick up gunk and fibers from the carpet under most high bite conditions. This is especially bad if the humidity is high.

Blends - These are the tires most people run today. They were initially called "JFT foam" by some, as it was believed that the tires were the same as the JFT tires. We can divide the blends further into two groups: high rubber and low rubber content. The high rubber would be the new rear Orange and Red from the BSR family, and the low rubber would be the Green and Blue varieties. When, asked about the difference, John Foister from BSR Tires said they came from the same "family" of foam, but they offered different grip. According to John, the Green/Blue has more bite than Orange/Red, but from track testing Oranges offer more bite than Green (being equivalent to in hardness) when the grip is high and absolutely no grip when it is lower. The Orange foam has a denser pore structure and the tire is not as prone to chunking. It is also important to note is that BSR Blue rears are not the same as the BSR Blue fronts!

JFT:
JFT stands for Japan Foam Tire. They started the new wave of foam tires we are all using now (Blue/Blu, Green/Greene, Dbl Blue, etc). These tires are a little different than the BSR tire family, but work in very similar conditions. They offers four varieties A (asphalt), C (carpet), S (???), and R (???). This does not mean that those types only work on that surface, but this is what they recommend.

JFT uses the same foam for fronts and rears if the color is the same.

A: Used on asphalt, considered close to the natural rubber variety and are named consistently with other natural tires.
C: Used on carpet, considered a blend.
S: Used on carpet?, tires are ???
R: Used on carpet?, tires are ???

For setup, the JFT foam seem to generate more bite than the BSR, therefore the car tends to be a little more aggressive.

Ulti:
Ulti is another Japanese brand that offers an array of compounds. They have their own way of rating tires, and are difficult to equate to other brands. They have 4 different varieties, each in varying degrees of hardness.

J: High rubber content tire, similar to Pink/ Magenta. Soft would be close to a pink. These offer the most bite and are great for asphalt/carpet front tire. (J hard being very popular)
X: "Balanced" blend, similar to JFT Blue/ Green. Soft is equivalent to Green, medium to Blue in hardness. Great for carpet!
Y: High synthetic blend with lower grip, and is not a very popular variety.
Z: A very expensive "special" foam that is supposed to be magic on asphalt. Only make it in soft shore.
European tires:
There are many great European foam tire brands that use their own types of foam, as well as traditional foams. SOmeone with more knowledge about them will need to fill this in!

Tire Diameter:
If you are racing on carpet, you have to evaluate how much grip your track has. If your track is low to medium grip, you can run bigger tires. If you are on higher bite you have to cut them smaller, there is simply no way around it. Bigger tires are needed for asphalt, especially in the rear. The larger tires provide much needed lateral bite.

Carpet (mm):
Low - Medium Bite
Front: 42.0 - 42.5
Rear: 42.5 - 43.00
Medium - High Bite
Front: 40.5 - 41.0
Rear: 41.5 - 42.0
Big Race
Front: 39.5 - 40.0
Rear: 40.5 - 41.0
Asphalt (mm):
Parking Lot
Front: 43.0 - 44.0
Rear: 44.0 - 45.0
Prepped High Bite
Front: 42.0 - 43.0
Rear: 43.0 - 44.0

Tire Saucing:
Most facilities have moved towards odorless traction additives such as SXT. Some of additives evaporate very quickly and some do not. This seems to be something that is also dependent on tire compound and ambient temperature. For example, saucing a Green compound seems like it never dries, especially when tjhe temperature is lower. We have found that wiping the tires off 15 minutes before we go run allows the sauce to cure, which makes the car come in much quicker with Green rears. Blue compounds on the other hand, do fine when wiped off right before hitting the track.

Saucing half front and full rear is a good initial starting point. If the front of the car is too agressive you can sauce les than half, or for a shorter amount of time. On black carpet the car may be numb to sauce changes, either a long or short sauce can produce very similar handling.
Tire Fuzzing:
In conditions of increasing grip, foam tires will somewtimes get sticky and pick up fuzz and debris from the track. This is highly dependent on the rubber sedan tire that is being run at your local track and the compound/ type of foam you are running on you car. The softer the sedan tire and the harder/higher rubber content in your foam tire, trouble with fuzzing seems more likely to occur.

There are ways to get around fuzzing under most conditions, and usually involves the selection of the correct foam compound. The more fuzz you get, the softer/lower rubber content you want to run.

Examples:
Problem: Car fuzzes with Lilac/Team Purple fronts and car starts pushing.
Solution: Use a softer front tire and or different family of foam. Replace it with Blue or Double Blue front. Alternatively you can sauce the front tires harder and tune the car for less front end bite.

Problem: Car loses rear bite 6 minutes into the run. Blue rear tires look almost clean but have small carpet hairs.
Solution: Use Green rear tires. The softer compound wears instead of getting sticky, minimizing fuzz. Possibly a longer sauce will prevent fuzzing.

Tire Selection:
Starting out, pick 2 tire compounds for the front and rear. The following should have you covered 99% of the time.

Rear - Green and Blue (BSR) or Green and Light Blue (JFT)
Front - Blue and Double Blue (BSR) or Blue and Dark Blue (JFT)

You may wonder about other compounds out there and if they might be better, trust me, they probably won't be. Even if there are other tires that can be as fast, the synthetic family wears out really fast and the high natural rubber will probably fuzz on you over an 8 minute run. The blends family seems to be the most versatile foam type available today. They last awhile, and sticking to them will make your process of tire selection simpler.
Tire Charts:
BSR/CRC/Jaco



Contact



Corally



JFT (Japan Foam Tire)



Ulti



Enneti (Xceed)



ELECTRONICS:
ESC:
As of now, ROAR is staying 1S (3.7V nominal; 4.2V fully charged) for 1/12. There are many 1S ESC's with a built in BEC so nothing else is required to power the receiver and servo.

If you don't want to lock yourself into a 1S specific ESC, you do have other options! It is possible to use your 2S ESC without a booster or receiver pack, and the ESC simply supplies the lower voltage. If that does not appeal to you, you will need to use an Rx pack or booster. The Rx pack and booster will both supply the receiver with a higher voltage than the 1S pack.

If you decide to use an Rx pack, MAKE SURE TO REMOVE THE RED WIRE FROM THE ESC PLUG THAT GOES INTO THE RECEIVER!!!

If you choose to use a voltage booster, it works exactly how it sounds. Instead of plugging the ESC into the receiver, it plugs into the booster, and the booster plug goes to the ESC, supplying the higher voltage.

1S ESC:
If there are any missing please add them!!

If anyone would like a need for a chart comparing the ESC's specs PM fenton06 and I'll get one made and put in here!
DISCONTINUED 1S ESC:
If there are any missing please add them!!


If anyone would like a need for a chart comparing the ESC's specs PM fenton06 and I'll get one made and put in here!

Voltage Boosters:
If there are any missing please add them!
Servos:
BODIES:
Black Art (CRC - US Dist):
  • Audi R8C - BA002 - .020 Thick



  • Black Market (Mohawk 12) - BA005 - .020



  • Lola B10 - BA006 - .020 thick
  • Toyota TS030 - BA008 - .020 thick

    Lola - black/red, TS030 - green/pink


PROTOForm:

Reflex Racing/RSD:

SUSPENSION ADJUSTMENTS:
Pan Car Front Suspension Tuning:
DISCLAIMER : The following tuning advice was written based on the tuning experience of the author and may not hold true for all cars, drivers, or surfaces. In the end the best tuning advice is to experiment and make changes one at a time so you can track your changes and find the car balance that works best for your driving style. One real world test is worth a million ‘expert’ opinions.

Front End Type:

All popular modern pan car front suspensions are very similar, with a few exceptions such as Speedmerchant New School but most of the info in this wiki applies to them as well. For the most part, they consist of a rigid bottom arm, an upper A-arm, and a kingpin with a spring. There are different flavors of this general design, such as the CRC Dynamic Strut that uses a threaded kingpin and upper pivot ball instead of the Associated style that uses a kingpin that goes through the entire steering knuckle assembly, but their operation is the same with the rigid lower arm and the upper arm controlling the arc of movement as the suspension is compressed.

Assembly:

More so than in almost any other part of the car, the front suspension of your 1/12 car must move absolutely free. Reamers and hobby knives are important here, as any binding will cause the car to corner unpredictably. A little play in the suspension is a good thing, and racers will often find that ‘worn in’ suspension pieces function a little better than new.

Springs:

Besides tires, spring rate is the most important part of deciding how your car will handle through corners, but are somewhat complicated. As a general rule of thumb, a very hard front spring will have somewhat less steering grip than a softer spring with the same suspension setup and tires, but not as much as in other classes such as touring or offroad. On carpet, springs of different tension can be used to tune how your car will maintain or lose energy through corners with the following general rule of thumb:

Hard Spring (0.55mm or harder): Less overall steering, quick reaction to driver input, less on power steering, harder turn-in with potentially lazy mid-corner and exit.

Soft Spring (.45mm): More overall steering especially at low speed, slightly slower reaction to driver input, more on-power steering, less aggressive turn-in but can ‘hook’ and give better mid-corner and exit.

It is worth noting that front springs from different suppliers are often very different, in both height, wire thickness, and coils for a given spring height meaning that a “medium” spring from one manufacturer may be the “hard” spring for another. To make accurate changes you may want to use one spring maker and stick with their line.

Another aspect to pan car springs is that they can get “blown out” and collapse, no longer as stiff or as tall as they were. These should be replaced with fresh springs to ensure consistent handling.

Dampening:

This is generally a minor adjustment, but adding dampening tube fluid to the front kingpins of a 1/12 car can give it a little more initial steering. Often unusual compounds see use here, such as Losi Smart Diff Grease or Associated Green Slime being a popular front kingpin lube.

Caster and Reactive Caster:

Caster is the angle of the kingpin, almost always angling back to the rear of the car, with a typical range from 0-10 degrees. Increasing your caster will typically result in less turn-in but a little more control, more steering exiting the corner, and somewhat increased straight-line stability with less tendency to wander because a wheel running caster will tend to straighten itself. Less caster will usually give you more off-power steering, but often with correspondingly less on-power when accelerating out of the corner.

Running reactive caster attempts to use both of these aspects to increase overall steering: when the car loads up on the outside front tire, the caster angle decreases, increasing the front end ‘hook’ as you enter the corner and then giving you the high caster on-power steering as you exit and weight is transferred off the front end. More reactive caster means more overall steering, but can mean you may have to adjust your driving style to drive more ‘ahead of the car’, needing to predict where the front end will grip.

As grip increases, less reactive caster is the normal tuning change made to keep the front end of the car from gripping too hard and oversteering and prevent traction roll. Static caster adjustments are still used to change the cars on power / off power steering balance.

Reactive Camber and Front Roll Center:

Reactive camber or camber gain is how much camber is added the front wheels as the suspension compresses. This can be increased or decreased by changing the angle and length of the top arm. Short, angled arm = more. Long, flat arm = less. More reactive camber will typically cause the car to “roll up” on the outer front wheel, transferring more weight in a turn and give more steering up to the point at which the tire is overloaded. This is generally more front grip and weight transfer than wanted on carpet, and as a result most cars run a flatter longer front arm.

Roll Center is the point on which the car will twist laterally or ‘roll’ during cornering. This can be raised or lowered by changing the angle and length of the top arm, with a short angled arm raising is slightly and a long flat arm lowering it. From what I have calculated most modern 1/12 cars meant for carpet have a roll center somewhere around the height of the chassis plate or just below it, but due to the lower arms being rigid and flat the roll center cannot be under the bottom of the tires like it often is on a touring car.
These two are inexorably linked in pan cars. Top arm length can be changed by the top arm mount in or out using shims or a CRC Long Arm kit, but is generally a minor tuning choice. Tuning of roll center with shims is usually a minor tuning choice in a pan car with a rigid bottom arm due to how the car cannot gain extra mechanical advantage on the lower arm as you can in a touring car, while reactive camber can be a significant driver of the car’s performance. In a modern car running on carpet the kit setup is usually perfectly fine.

Front End Alignment:

Static camber is the angle of your front wheels at rest, typically somewhere from 0 to 1.5 degrees on a pan car depending on surface, tire choice, and other factors, but a good starting point is usually somewhere around 0.5 degrees. More camber will typically give more steering, but many racers use static camber to ensure that their tires wear flat even if that means not having exactly equal camber on both sides of the car. This is adjusted by threading in and out the upper turnbuckle or pivot ball.

It is also worth noting that when running on high grip the flex and deformation of your chassis, suspension parts, and front wheels can become significant and cause uneven front tire wear. Some troubleshooting of the right combination of static camber, camber gain, caster, and tire/rim choice may be necessary to ensure even front tire wear.

Toe-In:

The front toe is one of the more easily adjusted aspects of the car and can have a significant effect on the attitude of the car due to it being a quick way to moderately adjust Ackerman without making significant other changes. With nothing else being adjusted, going from zero toe to toe-in will give a car a harder turn-in and will tend to scrub speed with the front end as opposed to using drag brake. This can be necessary when racing in Super Stock or higher power classes and will allow you to drive more aggressively, and can help the car track straighter under power. Toe-out will tend to make the car coast more through corners due to reducing the steering angle of the outer front tire. If a car has too much off-power steering but is otherwise stable, adding toe-out can calm the car but may the car to wander on the straights especially if the front end setup is very soft.

Ackerman:

Ackerman is the difference in steering angle between the two front tires during a turn. It is the result of how during a turn the inside of the car experiences a tighter circle and needs correspondingly more steering angle, but is also an important tuning tool. More Ackerman means having more inside wheel steering angle relative to the outer wheel, less means that the difference in steering angle is smaller.

To add or remove Ackerman, using a servo horn that spaces the links further apart (such as a Kimbrough Small Servo Saver, the outer holes on a Tamiya or Xray servo saver) will have more Ackerman than a servo that puts the links close together (Kimbrough Medium inner holes, Tamiya or Xray inner holes.) The rule of thumb is that a servo that puts the ball studs close together but spaced away from the servo horn will have less Ackerman than one that spaces them far apart and close to the servo horn. Ackerman changes will have the same effect as changing toe with more Ackerman being effectively toeing the wheels out and less toeing them in, but will not affect the straight-line attitude of the car.

Turning Circle / Steering Angle:

In offroad or even touring car you can set up the car to use the full angle of the steering 100% of the time. You will almost certainly not be able to do this in 1/12 scale. It goes without saying that as you turn up your steering angle you will gain steering often to the point of the car being undriveable. The quickest way to set the steering correctly is to set the sub-trim in your radio such that the car tracks straight and the servo horn is straight up and down, then set the endpoints equally such that they don't quite hit the steering bump-stops, then turn down the dual-rate or total throw from there. A typical starting point is somewhere between 45 and 60% of the total steering throw, or a 4-5' turning circle.
Pan Car Rear Pod Tuning:
Modern pan cars are all link cars with a center pivot ball and solid rear axle. This suspension system is required by ROAR rules and has the advantage of being simple, lightweight, and inexpensive compared to other more exotic methods of rear suspension, but it has some complicated movements that can be unintuitive.

Motion of the Rear Pod:

Due to how the rear pod is a solid axle, the only motion the pod itself sees is the main pivot up and down, but due to the main chassis being independently sprung it will feel the lean, dive, and squat of the main chassis as the car is driven. The lateral forces of the main chassis during cornering is transmitted through the main pivot ball and side links, the roll through the side springs and side dampeners, and the squat and dive through the main shock and spring. In addition, the torque of the motor against the pinion gear both during acceleration and braking is significant enough to cause a change in attitude even in low-powered classes. The motor pinion will try to “climb” the spur gear, lifting the center pivot of the car and countering the “squat” of the main chassis weight being transferred backward by the acceleration or the opposite under brakes.

Main Shock:

The adjustment of the main shock of a pan car is one of its more important tuning parameters. Spring, dampening oil, and pod droop are all controlled by the main shock.

Main Spring:

A soft main spring generally means more rear grip and more forgiving off-power, while a stiffer spring can mean more steering especially off-power, but the main spring must also be stiff enough to prevent the chassis from dragging when running on high grip. For most cars the kit spring is a medium weight spring that is a good starting point.

Main Shock Dampening:

The weight of the main shock oil will determine how fast the car will react off-power. 30wt or roughly 300cps shock oil is a good starting point, going up in weight will increase initial off-power turn-in, while going down will generally make initial turn-in softer. Often a heavier shock oil can make the car transition from entry to mid to corner exit smoother, where a car with light fluid may have a more pronounced ‘hook’ in the mid corner.

Side Springs:

The side springs transfer the roll motion of the main chassis to the rear plate via spring tension. Softer side springs give the car more rear grip and can make the car have a smoother steering feel. Stiffer springs promote the cars rotation and give more steering. You can either pre-load side springs or let them float, due to all side springs being progressive beehive shaped springs pre-load makes them effectively harder and will give more steering, but a small amount of pre-load can also make the care more predictable and forgiving. In conditions of extremely high grip, it may be possible to run no side springs at all due to the steering afforded by the tacky running surface and helps prevent traction-roll, likewise in extremely low grip when rear stability is absolutely necessary. Generally 1/12 cars run soft side springs but stiffer ones can be very common in Pro 10, WGT, or WGT-R.

Side Dampener Tubes:

Heavier tube lube will keep a car flatter at corner entry, initiating quicker. It may also make the car square off the corner entry when the grip gets beyond med-high. Going lighter will reduce steering initiation and maybe preferred on higher grip. This parameter is really unique to the driver preference, as some drivers are very fast and consistent with heavily dampened cars while others prefer softer setups.

Droop:

Controlled by the length of the shock, adjusting the rear pod droop is extremely important on high-grip surfaces. Reducing droop prevents the car from transferring weight during cornering and will give more rear stability and prevent traction-roll or problematic lifting of the inside rear tires during cornering, low droop can also give the car slightly more on-power steering. Increasing will allow the car to transfer more weight and dive harder into corners, but by allowing the center of the car to rise you will be more prone to traction roll issues. A typical starting point is 1-2mm of droop from ride height, but 0mm is often used on high grip.

Print Wikipost

Like Tree62Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-09-2009, 09:46 AM   #32386
Tech Elite
 
Slapmaster6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Edmonds, Wash.
Posts: 3,018
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottrik View Post
Testing here showed that with the same gearing a 1s / 13.5 was VERY close to the same as a 4-cell / 17.5. But when we started gearing the 1s / 13.5 up to where it was optimized it was significantly faster than the 4-cell / 17.5 is.

I know the W. Washington guys (Bodine, DuTemple, et al) have decided that 1s / 13.5 and 4-cell 13.5 run together acceptably well. The Fantasy World Summer Sizzler (25th Annual!!) allowed either of these specs and the main proved to be a duel between Mike with a 4-cell car vs. Brian with a 1s car. Bodine made a small mistake early and spent 6 minutes running several seconds behind but the gap was pretty much the same throughout. With 1 minute to go the 4-cell car began to slow noticeably (geared pretty aggressively to keep ahead of the BodineMachine) to near full dump at the end where he won by a second or so. Had the race been even one more lap (heck...one more corner) and Brian would have had him.
I would like to point out this was on asphalt out doors on a 80x 120'ish medium turn type track. Take this scenario to a 40x90 carpet track and I feel that you will see the 4 cell car has a .2ths advantage. Moral to the story is; even with weight allowances, I don't think that you will achieve a true evenness between 4 cell & 1S.

I can say that for those that are holding onto their 4 cells..... let 'em go! The 1S pack is the brushless motor of batteries. It's true that we are giving up on the best cells that we have had since the Sanyo 2000's, but get over it. You will be happier for it.

Brian
__________________
Stay dialed my friends!
www.slapmastertools.com
Team Roche USA
Team Orca orcharc.com
Slapmaster6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 09:55 AM   #32387
Tech Master
 
mkdut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: RC Retired
Posts: 1,961
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slapmaster6000 View Post
I would like to point out this was on asphalt out doors on a 80x 120'ish medium turn type track. Take this scenario to a 40x90 carpet track and I feel that you will see the 4 cell car has a .2ths advantage. Moral to the story is; even with weight allowances, I don't think that you will achieve a true evenness between 4 cell & 1S.

I can say that for those that are holding onto their 4 cells..... let 'em go! The 1S pack is the brushless motor of batteries. It's true that we are giving up on the best cells that we have had since the Sanyo 2000's, but get over it. You will be happier for it.

Brian
Anytime I can pick up 2 tenths on you I am happy. Makes for some pretty equal racing.
mkdut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:10 PM   #32388
Tech Champion
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,199
Trader Rating: 245 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkdut View Post
Anytime I can pick up 2 tenths on you I am happy. Makes for some pretty equal racing.
I need 20 tenths to make it close...
Scottrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 05:54 PM   #32389
Tech Elite
 
Slapmaster6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Edmonds, Wash.
Posts: 3,018
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default 3 cell nimh vs 1S???

20 tenths Next you'll be asking for 2 seconds!


You know, just for conversation..... has anyone tried 3 cell nimh against the 1S format with equal running weight? I know that you would have to go through all the booster/rx pack stuff for the 3 cell car, but would it ease the transition of the nimh guys into 1S and keep a club from splitting up the 12th scale classes?

Let's just suppose there is a club the runs about a dozen 12th scale cars, some are moving over to 1S while the others are left behind due the economy or what ever. I would guess that you could have the 4 cell guys drop a cell and have the new minimum weight be something like 800g for everyone. Sure, there will be some weight balancing to do in the chassis, but could it work? Will chargers correctly peak off 3 cells? The idea is.... a 4 cell guy would have just a few more race packs. And when the time comes, the switch over to 1S wouldn't be drastically different to the equipment once the budget allows it.
__________________
Stay dialed my friends!
www.slapmastertools.com
Team Roche USA
Team Orca orcharc.com
Slapmaster6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 06:36 PM   #32390
Tech Master
 
Drillit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oreganastan Pacific Wonderland home to Indoor Farming
Posts: 1,059
Default 3 cell

Brian.......you just had to ask didn't you

Current Wisdom on 1s Lipo 1/12th Scale

Quote:
Originally Posted by ammdrew View Post
There is no equal way to race 4 cell and lipo. The motor combo or wt combos do not work well and the corner speed vrs the accel points are so different it is a very hard battle.

We started testing early this year running 3 cell nimmh and single lipo.... Logically we run a 6 cell or 2 cell lipo in a sedan and wt equal we all have agreed they Are equal on the track. Well long story short 3 cell nimmh and single lipo are exactly that equal... And very easy to balance 3 cells in a tbar car so no reason to feel you need to upgrade a chassis just lop a cell off rebalance and have all the gains of lipo. Lower tire wear and all.

here are a couple vids from our 12th stock 17.5 mixed lipo and 3 cell nimmh. Club size track 36 x 60.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFyOVqN7oqI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKjS5Ii1yBo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NB7q3NQb9k
__________________
Mark Tilley
Got T-Bar ? ......... Oregons No ZigZag rule sucks
Bias the weight to the end you want to hit the wall with first!
Searchin fer answers in the Fog.......that's what I found
Drillit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 06:45 PM   #32391
Tech Champion
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,199
Trader Rating: 245 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slapmaster6000 View Post
20 tenths Next you'll be asking for 2 seconds!
You pass. The kids LOVE it when I give "improper fractions" and they can catch me on it. See, you're not getting older...you're just like my 12-13 yo students!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slapmaster6000 View Post
You know, just for conversation..... has anyone tried 3 cell nimh against the 1S format with equal running weight? I know that you would have to go through all the booster/rx pack stuff for the 3 cell car, but would it ease the transition of the nimh guys into 1S and keep a club from splitting up the 12th scale classes?

Let's just suppose there is a club the runs about a dozen 12th scale cars, some are moving over to 1S while the others are left behind due the economy or what ever. I would guess that you could have the 4 cell guys drop a cell and have the new minimum weight be something like 800g for everyone. Sure, there will be some weight balancing to do in the chassis, but could it work? Will chargers correctly peak off 3 cells? The idea is.... a 4 cell guy would have just a few more race packs. And when the time comes, the switch over to 1S wouldn't be drastically different to the equipment once the budget allows it.
I think the Minot group are doing something very much along those lines, though I have yet to see the details like weights or anything.

Here we just didn't have time to test so we ended up splitting the class. Not NECESSARILY a bad thing as it looks like the "shoes" (such as we are) will move into the 1s / 13.5 SuperStock class which should give everyone else a shot at the glory in the 1/12 Stock (4-cell / 17.5 or 27T). That was the theory anyway, last year's champ (the elder Poulson brother) will run both. I think we should make him run 1s / 17.5 in it. Heck, maybe I will too since it's looking like my only chance to run 1s Stock will be in Minot.
Scottrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 10:14 PM   #32392
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Great Falls, MT
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottrik View Post
Here we just didn't have time to test so we ended up splitting the class. Not NECESSARILY a bad thing as it looks like the "shoes" (such as we are) will move into the 1s / 13.5 SuperStock class which should give everyone else a shot at the glory in the 1/12 Stock (4-cell / 17.5 or 27T). That was the theory anyway, last year's champ (the elder Poulson brother) will run both. I think we should make him run 1s / 17.5 in it. Heck, maybe I will too since it's looking like my only chance to run 1s Stock will be in Minot.
Scottrik,

Don't forget about trying your 1s 17.5 stock when you come up to Great Falls for the inagural Montana State 1/12th Team Shootout Series!

We've got 9 or 10 guys for race nights with 5 switching over to Lipo/17.5. We're on a small track for most of you (26x54) and still figuring the Rollout for the Lipo's, getting pretty close. We run everybody together and it's been great so far. The competition is closer than ever and it's really anybodys game now to be in the top 4 for the A-main. We haven't compensated any weight and our whole group has ended up performing in a tighter pack. We've had more fun in the last couple of weeks with close racing than we've had in a long time. Adrenaline man, it's a good thing.

I can see on a large layout, things might not match up. Smaller, tighter layouts don't look to be an issue. Maybe it's good for the fastest guys to have to race with somebody instead of running away from them? Those Poulsen's are to fast anyway, aren't they?

Aaron
VRacing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 10:27 PM   #32393
Tech Champion
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,199
Trader Rating: 245 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VRacing View Post
Those Poulsen's are to fast anyway, aren't they?
We'll sell 'em to you cheap...

Aaron, give me a call when you get a minute.

Thanks,

Scottrik
Scottrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 12:10 AM   #32394
Tech Elite
 
Scottmisfits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,104
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

So I finally got to run my 1/12 scale tonight.

I was running full size Jaco's as my lathe hasn't shown up and a 73 spur with a 53 pinion, Tekin RS Pro and an Orca 17.5. That gave me a rollout close to 111mm. I had plenty on the straight and didn't give up alot in the corners, but I did give up some. I was actually keeping up to a guy running 13.5 on the straight. I did try a 50t pinion but prefered the feel of the 53t. It made me be smoother on the throttle.

I did have one problem though. I am running the Novak smart boost and a couple of times I lost power to the receiver so it would go full throttle through the corner, generally straight into the boards. I have a 4 channel receiver and the thing is full with the ESC, servo, transponder and the Smart Boost. What can I do to help eliminate this? I know I could try a receiver pack but I just spent the money on the booster.
Scottmisfits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 04:16 AM   #32395
Tech Champion
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,199
Trader Rating: 245 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottmisfits View Post
I was running full size Jaco's as my lathe hasn't shown up and a 73 spur with a 53 pinion, Tekin RS Pro and an Orca 17.5. That gave me a rollout close to 111mm. I had plenty on the straight and didn't give up alot in the corners, but I did give up some. I was actually keeping up to a guy running 13.5 on the straight. I did try a 50t pinion but prefered the feel of the 53t. It made me be smoother on the throttle.

I did have one problem though. I am running the Novak smart boost and a couple of times I lost power to the receiver so it would go full throttle through the corner, generally straight into the boards. I have a 4 channel receiver and the thing is full with the ESC, servo, transponder and the Smart Boost. What can I do to help eliminate this? I know I could try a receiver pack but I just spent the money on the booster.
Install a capacitor. The easiest method would be to pick up one of the Spektrum caps and plug it into the receiver (may require changing the plug or even doubling-up with the Smart-Boost plug?) and Futaba themselves may very well have a similar product. They run $5-6 at Stormers ready-to-install. Or pick up capacitor (the Spektrum one should work here as well, or Novak, or...) and install it in input lead for the Smart Boost.

What is happening is that you're pulling some BIG gearing and on hard acceleration you're pulling the battery voltage down. I'm kinda surprised you aren't getting too much heat into the motor or esc. Something I've found with the BL motors/esc's is that I can gear up and up (minding my temps!!) until the lap times begin to level out or fall off but some time before I've gotten there the car pulls noticeably less hard off the corners. You are able to compensate by making your corners more and more sweeping. While this MAY get peak lap times when you're on your own on the track you'll find this to be counter-productive in race situations as when you sweep your turns like this you're extending a HUGE invitation (which WILL be accepted) for your competitors who are accelerating harder off the turns to push it up the inside and pass you. Yeah, higher top-end speed "feels good" but you give up a little of that to keep more acceleration and tighter lines in the infield. Just how much you "give to get" is a compromise you have to get a feel for but for me it seems to be 5-10mm (maybe closer to 10mm) below where I get my peak lap time.

The neat thing is that backing of your gearing a bit may very well "kill" your voltage drop problem. Regardless, make sure you temp your motor and esc--I've not heard of anybody running gearing quite THAT high. I've not run any 1s / 17.5 (only 13.5 and 10.5) but my understanding is folks are running 95-105mm depending on how "tight" their track is and what their own personal trade-off factor is.
Scottrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 05:45 AM   #32396
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 708
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I saw the mention of running 3 cell NiMh/19 turn in order to have a little parity with LiPo/10.5. My question is: would this be feasible running brushed or is the efficiency not there to make it the full 8 minutes? Would I be better off running a LiPo RX pack with a regulator or an old school 5 cell NiMh RX pack (ESC's are Novak GTS and KO VFS-1)? I will be making the switch to 1s LiPo and brushless when funds allow and when I've burned through the stock of brushed motors and brushes that I have. I also wouldn't mind getting a little more use out of that ancient lathe of mine....

Thanks in advance for any advice!!!!
adam lancia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 06:13 AM   #32397
Company Representative
 
ammdrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,451
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

We run 3 cell nimmh/ or single cell lipo with the min wt of 730 also. A bit f work but you can get close to wt. Lipo car and 3 cell car are nuts on for lap times tire wear an speed they do different things for drop off through the run.

This is 12th stock on our small track 17.5 3.7v. Yellow and white car is lipo and red with white nose is 3 cell nimmh. Both of these drivers normally are racing nose to tail.

+ YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.


and here is the race data so you can see lap times etc.

http://jlapracemanager.com/PC/Molzer...ed%20Night.HTM
__________________
Team Tekin, Team Scream, Paint By Mike, Team Mölzer Mowery Racing, EA Motorsports, Speedmerchant, TQ Wire

MMR Direct Minneapolis World Class Indoor Race Facility.
On Road and Off Road racing year round.

www.molzermoweryracing.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/MMR/160679913944205?__req=9

Check out You Tube mmrswracing. Every qualifier and every main uploaded at the end of every race day.

Last edited by ammdrew; 10-10-2009 at 09:22 AM.
ammdrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 02:31 PM   #32398
Tech Adept
 
Lee_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Somewhere over there, S.E. PA
Posts: 243
Default LRP QC3 with LiPO 1S?

Has anyone tried to run a 1S LiPO with a LRP QC3 ESC? Its LiPO rated but it appears this is for 2S.

Thanks, Lee B.
__________________
.
Member of "The Seldom Seen R/C Racing Team"

RC10L (Pro 10, WGT), TC4, BMI DB12RR, Scalpel
Lee_123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 06:59 PM   #32399
Tech Elite
 
Slapmaster6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Edmonds, Wash.
Posts: 3,018
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee_123 View Post
Has anyone tried to run a 1S LiPO with a LRP QC3 ESC? Its LiPO rated but it appears this is for 2S.

Thanks, Lee B.
It is rated for 2S, but you could run a Novak booster which has a 1S cut off feature that should keep you safe. Many are turning the esc lipo safety cut off "off" any way.
__________________
Stay dialed my friends!
www.slapmastertools.com
Team Roche USA
Team Orca orcharc.com
Slapmaster6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 09:52 PM   #32400
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sterling, Illinois
Posts: 816
Default Brushless motor in Switchblade

Does anyone know if a brushless motor will fit in a Switchblade SE?
slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New to the forum mig rod Electric Off-Road 1 01-05-2008 04:23 PM
hi i need help and im new to the forum racer4 Rookie Zone 4 01-21-2007 01:37 PM
Why is this forum listed under the On Road Forum? sport10 Onroad Nitro Engine Zone 0 01-11-2007 07:06 AM
Forum Changes... futureal Wisconsin & Illinois Racing 3 10-28-2002 08:26 PM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 10:52 PM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net