R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

    Hide Wikipost
Old 10-28-2016, 12:43 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech Forums Thread Wiki: 1/12 forum
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: fenton06
This is a place to share knowledge related to 1/12th scale racing. It is not to be used for conversations.

KITS:
Click links to go to manufacturer product page. If any are missing please add them!

TIRES:
Pre-mounted tires readily available in the US:
Pre-mounted tires readily available in the Europe:
  • Hot Race ??

Gluing your own donuts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm7z1rz-74s - Special thanks to Edward Pickering!
Truing tires:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wqHOLWq6Uc - Special thanks to Edward Pickering!

The following information came from HERE, with some editing and information added. Thanks Christian!

THIS MAY NEED UPDATING FOR THE NEW BLACK CRC CARPET

Brands:
BSR, CRC, Jaco:
Pro One is no longer selling to the public, but it and the brands above are all mounted by BSR and use the same foam. The nomenclature of the BSR vs Jaco/CRC is a little different in a few instances but is otherwise the same. The BSR foam consists of three families, and can be identifed as synthetics, naturals, and blends.

Synthetics - The old school, light weight, easy to true "dry feeling" tires. These include tires like CRC/Jaco Yellow (BSR White), Black, Gray, etc. These tires offer the highest wear rate and lowest grip. Many racers continue to use these nder high bite conditions.

Naturals - These tires are usually the best alternative for low bite and asphalt. They include Pink, Magenta, Double Pink, Lilac (BSR Team Purple), Purple, and other tires. These tires provide a ton of grip, but tend to get sticky in high bite conditions. This rubber does not wear as easily, and the cars will pick up gunk and fibers from the carpet under most high bite conditions. This is especially bad if the humidity is high.

Blends - These are the tires most people run today. They were initially called "JFT foam" by some, as it was believed that the tires were the same as the JFT tires. We can divide the blends further into two groups: high rubber and low rubber content. The high rubber would be the new rear Orange and Red from the BSR family, and the low rubber would be the Green and Blue varieties. When, asked about the difference, John Foister from BSR Tires said they came from the same "family" of foam, but they offered different grip. According to John, the Green/Blue has more bite than Orange/Red, but from track testing Oranges offer more bite than Green (being equivalent to in hardness) when the grip is high and absolutely no grip when it is lower. The Orange foam has a denser pore structure and the tire is not as prone to chunking. It is also important to note is that BSR Blue rears are not the same as the BSR Blue fronts!

JFT:
JFT stands for Japan Foam Tire. They started the new wave of foam tires we are all using now (Blue/Blu, Green/Greene, Dbl Blue, etc). These tires are a little different than the BSR tire family, but work in very similar conditions. They offers four varieties A (asphalt), C (carpet), S (???), and R (???). This does not mean that those types only work on that surface, but this is what they recommend.

JFT uses the same foam for fronts and rears if the color is the same.

A: Used on asphalt, considered close to the natural rubber variety and are named consistently with other natural tires.
C: Used on carpet, considered a blend.
S: Used on carpet?, tires are ???
R: Used on carpet?, tires are ???

For setup, the JFT foam seem to generate more bite than the BSR, therefore the car tends to be a little more aggressive.

Ulti:
Ulti is another Japanese brand that offers an array of compounds. They have their own way of rating tires, and are difficult to equate to other brands. They have 4 different varieties, each in varying degrees of hardness.

J: High rubber content tire, similar to Pink/ Magenta. Soft would be close to a pink. These offer the most bite and are great for asphalt/carpet front tire. (J hard being very popular)
X: "Balanced" blend, similar to JFT Blue/ Green. Soft is equivalent to Green, medium to Blue in hardness. Great for carpet!
Y: High synthetic blend with lower grip, and is not a very popular variety.
Z: A very expensive "special" foam that is supposed to be magic on asphalt. Only make it in soft shore.
European tires:
There are many great European foam tire brands that use their own types of foam, as well as traditional foams. SOmeone with more knowledge about them will need to fill this in!

Tire Diameter:
If you are racing on carpet, you have to evaluate how much grip your track has. If your track is low to medium grip, you can run bigger tires. If you are on higher bite you have to cut them smaller, there is simply no way around it. Bigger tires are needed for asphalt, especially in the rear. The larger tires provide much needed lateral bite.

Carpet (mm):
Low - Medium Bite
Front: 42.0 - 42.5
Rear: 42.5 - 43.00
Medium - High Bite
Front: 40.5 - 41.0
Rear: 41.5 - 42.0
Big Race
Front: 39.5 - 40.0
Rear: 40.5 - 41.0
Asphalt (mm):
Parking Lot
Front: 43.0 - 44.0
Rear: 44.0 - 45.0
Prepped High Bite
Front: 42.0 - 43.0
Rear: 43.0 - 44.0

Tire Saucing:
Most facilities have moved towards odorless traction additives such as SXT. Some of additives evaporate very quickly and some do not. This seems to be something that is also dependent on tire compound and ambient temperature. For example, saucing a Green compound seems like it never dries, especially when tjhe temperature is lower. We have found that wiping the tires off 15 minutes before we go run allows the sauce to cure, which makes the car come in much quicker with Green rears. Blue compounds on the other hand, do fine when wiped off right before hitting the track.

Saucing half front and full rear is a good initial starting point. If the front of the car is too agressive you can sauce les than half, or for a shorter amount of time.
Tire Fuzzing:
In conditions of increasing grip, foam tires will somewtimes get sticky and pick up fuzz and debris from the track. This is highly dependent on the rubber sedan tire that is being run at your local track and the compound/ type of foam you are running on you car. The softer the sedan tire and the harder/higher rubber content in your foam tire, trouble with fuzzing seems more likely to occur.

There are ways to get around fuzzing under most conditions, and usually involves the selection of the correct foam compound. The more fuzz you get, the softer/lower rubber content you want to run.

Examples:
Problem: Car fuzzes with Lilac/Team Purple fronts and car starts pushing.
Solution: Use a softer front tire and or different family of foam. Replace it with Blue or Double Blue front.

Problem: Car loses rear bite 6 minutes into the run. Blue rear tires look almost clean but have small carpet hairs.
Solution: Use Green rear tires. The softer compound wears instead of getting sticky, minimizing fuzz.

Tire Selection:
Starting out, pick 2 tire compounds for the front and rear. The following should have you covered 99% of the time.

Front - Green and Blue (BSR) or Green and Light Blue (JFT)
Rear - Blue and Double Blue (BSR) or Blue and Dark Blue (JFT)

You may wonder about other compounds out there and if they might be better, trust me, they probably won't be. Even if there are other tires that can be as fast, the synthetic family wears out really fast and the high natural rubber will probably fuzz on you over an 8 minute run. The blends family seems to be the most versatile foam type available today. They last awhile, and sticking to them will make your process of tire selection simpler.
Tire Charts:
BSR/CRC/Jaco



Contact



Corally



JFT (Japan Foam Tire)



Ulti



Enneti (Xceed)



ELECTRONICS:
ESC:
As of now, ROAR is staying 1S (3.7V nominal; 4.2V fully charged) for 1/12. There are many 1S ESC's with a built in BEC so nothing else is required to power the receiver and servo.

If you don't want to lock yourself into a 1S specific ESC, you do have other options! It is possible to use your 2S ESC without a booster or receiver pack, and the ESC simply supplies the lower voltage. If that does not appeal to you, you will need to use an Rx pack or booster. The Rx pack and booster will both supply the receiver with a higher voltage than the 1S pack.

If you decide to use an Rx pack, MAKE SURE TO REMOVE THE RED WIRE FROM THE ESC PLUG THAT GOES INTO THE RECEIVER!!!

If you choose to use a voltage booster, it works exactly how it sounds. Instead of plugging the ESC into the receiver, it plugs into the booster, and the booster plug goes to the ESC, supplying the higher voltage.

1S ESC:
If there are any missing please add them!!

If anyone would like a need for a chart comparing the ESC's specs PM fenton06 and I'll get one made and put in here!
Voltage Boosters:
If there are any missing please add them!
Servos:
BODIES:
Black Art (CRC - US Dist):
  • Audi R8C - BA002 - .020 Thick



  • Black Market (Mohawk 12) - BA005 - .020



  • Lola B10 - BA006 - .020 thick
  • Toyota TS030 - BA008 - .020 thick

    Lola - black/red, TS030 - green/pink


PROTOForm:

Reflex Racing/RSD:

SUSPENSION ADJUSTMENTS:

Print Wikipost

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-23-2008, 11:28 PM   #29761
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 708
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InspGadgt View Post
What I find interesting in that pic is not the fact that it's a t-plate car...it was only inevitable that they would drop the Gen X pod and front suspension on to the T-force chassis...What I find interesting is the front steering links...if you look closely it looks like he's using rubber bands instead of cotton or o-rings to take up the slop in the ball cups.
Ah, soooooo clever

Brian: Do you mean Frank as in Frank Calandra?
adam lancia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 07:34 AM   #29762
Tech Fanatic
 
nrtv20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 879
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Is anyone going to run the 5300 SHO batteries this year or staying with the 4600's? I havn't heard much talk about them but they are legal at cleveland!
__________________
http://www.trautengineering.com/ http://www.toledooneeighthracers.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/nrtv20
One Eigth Racers of Toledo; Hobby Stop West Track; "The Gate" NORCAR
FUTABA 2.4G FASST, Spec-R S1, Speed Passion SP-1, Sakura D3 FWD, Kyosho Evolva M3, Team Losi XX-4, Caster EX1.5R, HPI Wheelie King Crawler, Quanum Aquaholic, Joysway Wildcat
nrtv20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 12:36 PM   #29763
Tech Elite
 
Grenade10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 4,667
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Working on a new car and was wondering what ROAR's min weight for 1/12 scale is going to be. I had heard that they were talking about raising the min form 794, just have not seen anything.
__________________
Darkside, Sweep, BSR, Fantom, IGT Hobbies and IGT8
Byrons Fuel, ProtoForm Bodies & Futaba Radio Gear by Choice
Founding Member of CORRC .... 5280raceway
www.darksidems.com www.igthobbies.com www.IGT8.com
Grenade10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 01:17 PM   #29764
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 858
Trader Rating: 6 (88%+)
Default

Im 90% sure that it was bumped up for this year. I dont remember. For some reason 865g sits in my head. I would look but my Adobe is acting up.
Johnny Carey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 02:10 PM   #29765
Tech Fanatic
 
Ffejdat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 904
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

880g is what I read friday nite...
__________________
Ahhhh, I could'a got a falcon!
Ffejdat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 05:44 PM   #29766
Tech Elite
 
Grenade10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 4,667
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ffejdat View Post
880g is what I read friday nite...
I think the 880 was a typo in the 2008 rule books. If I remember correctly it was sill 794 for carpet Nationals in Omaha. I had also heard 860, but can not confirm it anywhere.
__________________
Darkside, Sweep, BSR, Fantom, IGT Hobbies and IGT8
Byrons Fuel, ProtoForm Bodies & Futaba Radio Gear by Choice
Founding Member of CORRC .... 5280raceway
www.darksidems.com www.igthobbies.com www.IGT8.com
Grenade10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 06:20 PM   #29767
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 237
Default Weight

I believe the 865g number is correct with the change to brushless racing. I think that is the IFMAR weight and that is what the major races like the IIC and the IndoorChamps are running.


Ffej, I bet you use the whole chicken!!!!
__________________
Mitch Witteman
"Everybody goes faster!!"
www.teamcrc.com, www.teameam.com, www.tqwire.com, www.slapmastertools.com, Drinks Inc., SJS, KoonDog and M&G Roustabout
flyernemesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 06:26 PM   #29768
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 599
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default newbie Q

i,m new to this scale (1/12),but not on roadracing. whats the min torque needed on the steering servo ? will mirco servos work ?
isuzuguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2008, 09:56 PM   #29769
Tech Elite
 
Slapmaster6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Edmonds, Wash.
Posts: 2,949
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Adam; yep... that Big Frank.

Inspector... I didn't catch the rubber bands, the pic quality is a bit low for my poor eye sight. Some cars work better with slop. I have never had one work better with none. Odd.

Bigbot... Paragon GE should be your better choice. I think that rubber touring guys will use FXII from time to time.

Grenade... wouldn't be surprised if roar ups the min. weight to efra's. Yes, 880g is the old typo that still haunts the pages. 865g seems heavy to me, but it should be easily reachable by many without trying.

And since I am on a roll... many have been asking if I have a thrust kit for the Asc 12r5 that they will be doing the b/l 10r5 pod mod. Early indication is that my #109 Niftech thrust kit will work just fine for the Asc mod pod. I will be updating the Slapmaster website soon with some fitment info. The days of the "one size fits all" thrust kit are gone. This is what I have so far:

SMT #101 fits: Asc, IRS, CRC, CEFX, Speedmerchant, Asc 10R5 WGT

SMT #109 fits: Niftech 12th scale axles, Asc 12R5 w/ 10R5 pod (pending)

SMT #110 fits: most oval 10th scale chassis

SMT #120 fits: CRC GenX10 WGT

Brian
Slapmaster6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 01:11 AM   #29770
Tech Elite
 
rezenclowd3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Solvang, CA
Posts: 2,367
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to rezenclowd3
Default

Brian, I will confirm that part #101 fits my AE 12R5 WITHOUT the BL pod. I also used the stock cone instead (turned 180 from stock setup) of the plastic bushing. It works fine and stays centered on the outside of the bearing.
__________________
OOMSGFX.COM (no longer painting, but take a look for fun!), Roadrunners RC Club
"Racing drivers have balls, unfortunately, none of them are crystal" (David Coulthard)
"I believe the average IQ of a NASCAR fan is only marginally above the things that hit the windscreen during the race. "
rezenclowd3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2008, 08:39 AM   #29771
Tech Elite
 
Slapmaster6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Edmonds, Wash.
Posts: 2,949
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

The delrin spacer is actually the new spring instead of leaving a belleville washer in the mix. If you use a nylon nut, you should be fine. If you use an aluminum nut, your adjustment range is going to be very small. And yes, the #101 fits the Asc 12R5.
Slapmaster6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 09:03 AM   #29772
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,458
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

I have been hearing about the "brushless conversion" for the new 12r5. Does anyone know if it has been released yet, or can direct me to a picture or something? All I can find is the brushless hub. Thanks.
MUDVAYNE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 09:29 AM   #29773
Regional Moderator
 
mrrcguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jonesboro Akansas
Posts: 3,157
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Camber Question #27,196!

Is it incorrect to have a different amount of camber (left to right) to get even tire wear. I see why one would do this as it makes tire management easier, but it also seams goofy as it gives slightly unbalanced handling. Doesnt it?
mrrcguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 09:52 AM   #29774
Tech Master
 
CanyonCarverR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,340
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Can someone tell me what roll-out is and how to calculate it.
CanyonCarverR1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 10:03 AM   #29775
Tech Champion
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,123
Trader Rating: 239 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanyonCarverR1 View Post
Can someone tell me what roll-out is and how to calculate it.
Sorry guys...he asked.

Roll-out Primer

Here's a bit of a primer on roll-out.

Gearing a foam-tire on-road car is ENTIRELY dependent on the current diameter of your tires. What you're trying to find is how far the car moves forward for every revolution of the motor. To express it any other way is hopeless because of the fact that foam tires change diameter where rubber tires, effectively, do not. Also we'll see why the question "what gear to run" is impossible to answer without some of the other variables answered.

Once you understand the concepts behind roll-out it's a matter of measuring your rear tire dia. and consulting the roll-out chart to find desired roll-out and what size pinion gets that for you. BUT...like a lot of things in life you will gain a FAR better appreciation and understanding for this phenomenon if you do it the hard way a few times. Remember that prior to PC's and easy to download Excell share-sheets we had to manually calculate roll-out and this is a good skill to have because even now I'll end up with an oddball spur gear or a value that doesn't show up on the chart. Or I'll leave my charts someplace. Or... Plus the mathematician/math teacher in me LOVES this stuff!

This is where your high school geometry comes in handy (you remember...the stuff you and every other kid on earth said "but I'll never use it"). Roll out is calculated using good ol' pi (3.14159...). You multiply the tire diameter by pi and that gives you the tire circumference (distance around the tire). Then divide your spur gear by the pinion gear to get your final drive ratio. Finally, divide the tire circumference by the fdr and you have roll-out. The roll-out charts all do this but it is performed on an Excell spread sheet.

What you're usually trying to do is find what pinion to use. If you know your tire dia/circumference, spur gear teeth and desired roll-out value you can identify the pinion size that yields your desired roll-out with a little algebraic manipulation.

The base formula is (remembering that / means "divided by"):

(pi X tire diameter) / (spur teeth / pinion teeth) = roll-out

Let's call (pi X tire diameter) "tire circumference" and (spur teeth / pinion teeth) "final drive ratio" (though we probably won't use this for now).

As I said, the mystery number is usually the pinion teeth so we want to segregate that variable.

Our base formula is now:

(tire circumference) / (spur teeth / pinion teeth) = roll-out

Noting that we have a "double division" in this base formula (basically a fraction in the bottom of a fraction) our first step is to take the bottom fraction, (spur teeth / pinion teeth), invert it and multiply by the tire circumference, giving:

(tire circumference) X (pinion teeth / spur teeth) = roll-out

Now we multiply both sides by spur teeth giving us:

(tire circumference) X (pinion teeth) = (roll-out) X (spur teeth)

Finally, divide both sides by (tire circumference) and we get our desired result:

pinion teeth = (roll-out X spur teeth) / tire circumference

Seems like the long way to get there but THIS is the point where you'll start. This last is the only formula you'll need if you know everything BUT the pinion gear size. I just showed the math to get there as proof. Please note that there are a couple ways to get from there to here but the result will be the same.

So, say you're like me and have a 96T spur gear and new 48mm dia rear tires. You want to be a little conservative so you're going to start with a 40mm roll-out (I think I'm running about 42-43mm in Stock). The pinion you need is found by:

pinion teeth = (40mm X 96 teeth) / (48mm X pi)

Remember that pi is approximately equal to 3.14159 (you can really stop at 3.14, but what's the fun in that?)

pinion teeth = (40mm X 96 teeth) / (150.8mm)

pinion teeth = (3840 mm teeth) / 150.8mm)

When we divide out the right side the mm cancel leaving only teeth AND the desired result.

pinion teeth = 25.46 teeth

NOW...a 25.46 tooth pinion is a bear to find, and it usually doesn't mesh worth CRAP even if you do locate one. You'll need to round up or down, especially since you're nearly exactly in the middle. This little difference probably won't be catastrophic (provided your initial assumption was "conservative" as I did) either way, so I'd probably do a 26T pinion and settle for the 40.84mm roll-out.

NOTICE...the roll-out we "accepted" in this example is almost a full mm more than what our target was. THAT'S how quickly things that seem really small can change things once multiplied back out. This difference is about a 2% variance but such is what we're left with since we can only go to full tooth intervals on pinions. The only alternative would be to true the tires down a nick. I can find that amount (if I was really concerned...in this case I really wouldn't be but will make the entire case for our discussion) by going back a step in our earlier calculation to where we had:

(tire circumference) X (pinion teeth) = (roll-out) X (spur teeth)

And divide both sides by pinion teeth to yield:

tire circumference = (roll-out X spur teeth) / pinion teeth

tire circumference = (40mm X 96 teeth) / 26 teeth

Multiplying and dividing (this time "teeth" cancel) we find that the tire circumference to hit EXACTLY 40mm roll-out would be 147.7mm. Divide this by pi and we see we need to true the rear tires to 47mm...taking a full mm off of them. Again, a bigger result than anticipated, but that result is multiplied by over 3 X to enter the equations.

Once you're comfortable with roll-out we'll tackle ride height adjustment.
__________________
Congressmen should wear uniforms like NASCAR drivers so we can identify their corporate sponsors.

THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED -Gil Scott-Heron (1949-2011)
Scottrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New to the forum mig rod Electric Off-Road 1 01-05-2008 05:23 PM
hi i need help and im new to the forum racer4 Rookie Zone 4 01-21-2007 02:37 PM
Why is this forum listed under the On Road Forum? sport10 Onroad Nitro Engine Zone 0 01-11-2007 08:06 AM
Forum Changes... futureal Wisconsin & Illinois Racing 3 10-28-2002 09:26 PM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 03:28 PM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0