R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2007, 11:54 PM   #16906
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 131
Default

thanks all, so its basically just ignore the letters
LEE UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 09:20 AM   #16907
Tech Addict
 
mutley001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 662
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Got a question about the risers on the EC
A lot of drivers are removing the gearbox risers and using either the std towers or the carpet towers but what advantages/disadvantages does this have when racing on carpet/tarmack using rubber tyres? I had a bit of success with the ec as it was bult out of the box but carrying out these modifications in the hopes of getting the car to go faster has left me chasing setups that work. Can someone explain this issue to me please?
Thanks

Paul
__________________
ARC R11 2017
ARC R10 2013
EA Motorsports www.teameamotorsports.com
Team EAM
mutley001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 10:01 AM   #16908
Tech Champion
 
Jon Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,658
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

To me, when I took out the risers and raised the front inner camber link location 2mm above stock and used the top hole on the rear tower (rubber towers) it made the car flow through the corners much faster but it still felt very stable and calm. It didn't get twitchy at all.
Jon Kerr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 12:27 PM   #16909
Tech Addict
 
mutley001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 662
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Can you recommend a good base setup for rubber tyre tarmac and carpet then please Jon. I need to work out if its me or the car and at this point i'm beginning to think its me!

Cheers
Paul
__________________
ARC R11 2017
ARC R10 2013
EA Motorsports www.teameamotorsports.com
Team EAM
mutley001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 03:04 PM   #16910
Tech Elite
 
Skiddins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 4,545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Kerr
To me, when I took out the risers and raised the front inner camber link location 2mm above stock and used the top hole on the rear tower (rubber towers) it made the car flow through the corners much faster but it still felt very stable and calm. It didn't get twitchy at all.
Would the equivalent to raising the front camber link up 2mm after removing risers (using the standard rubber shock towers) be to use the carpet towers?
As far as I can tell the only real difference between the carpet and rubber towers (other than more holes in the carpet versions) is the position of the camber link holes.

Skiddins
__________________
Xray T4'16, T4'14 (Wet Car)
Xray X12 2016
Xray X1'16
wlrc.co.uk (West London Racing Centre)
RCDisco.co.uk
Skiddins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 04:25 PM   #16911
Tech Champion
 
Jon Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,658
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Mutley- For asphalt, I'd start with the kit setup, just remove the risers from under the bulkheads and between the motor/layshaft mounts and top deck. Then move the rear camber link to the top hole. Drill or slot the front camber link in the tower 2mm up to make up for the tower being 2mm lower from removing the risers. This is a good starting point. For rubber tires on carpet, try Weylin's setup from Vegas. There's a few little detail things he did on that car. Follow his setup sheet and that should be a good place to start.

Skiddins- I know a lot of guys have run the carpet towers with the risers removed. It will raise the camber link like you need, but it also moves it out a little bit. I haven't tried this myself but it is something that should work too.
Jon Kerr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 06:52 PM   #16912
Tech Elite
 
Skiddins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 4,545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Kerr
Mutley- For asphalt, I'd start with the kit setup, just remove the risers from under the bulkheads and between the motor/layshaft mounts and top deck. Then move the rear camber link to the top hole. Drill or slot the front camber link in the tower 2mm up to make up for the tower being 2mm lower from removing the risers. This is a good starting point. For rubber tires on carpet, try Weylin's setup from Vegas. There's a few little detail things he did on that car. Follow his setup sheet and that should be a good place to start.

Skiddins- I know a lot of guys have run the carpet towers with the risers removed. It will raise the camber link like you need, but it also moves it out a little bit. I haven't tried this myself but it is something that should work too.
What's the advantage of the rear camber link being so low compared with the front?

Skiddins
__________________
Xray T4'16, T4'14 (Wet Car)
Xray X12 2016
Xray X1'16
wlrc.co.uk (West London Racing Centre)
RCDisco.co.uk
Skiddins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 07:12 PM   #16913
Tech Champion
 
Jon Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,658
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

I have the rear inner link as high as it will go without modifying things. I normally ran the rear link in the low position when I had the risers in. So lowering the bulkhead and raising the inner camber link should keep the link at the same angle. When you raise the inner link, that lowers the roll center on that end which gives that end more grip.
Jon Kerr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 04:35 AM   #16914
Tech Addict
 
mutley001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 662
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Thanks Jon, at least ill find out if there's something up with the car that I haven't spotted or if it's me now. Next club meet is on Thursday - I'll let you know how I get on!

Cheers
Paul
__________________
ARC R11 2017
ARC R10 2013
EA Motorsports www.teameamotorsports.com
Team EAM
mutley001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 06:41 AM   #16915
Tech Champion
 
STLNLST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 8,769
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Kerr
I have the rear inner link as high as it will go without modifying things. I normally ran the rear link in the low position when I had the risers in. So lowering the bulkhead and raising the inner camber link should keep the link at the same angle. When you raise the inner link, that lowers the roll center on that end which gives that end more grip.
What's up? Gotta keep in touch with my homies. I'll be heading to the track in a hour or so to enjoy the NWCC. Gotta rep norcal ya know...
__________________
REMEMBER THE GOOD OLE DAYS..........THEY'RE NEVER COMING BACK SO WE'RE STUCK WITH THE MESS IN FRONT OF US!!!!
STLNLST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 08:22 AM   #16916
Tech Initiate
 
matt_h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SOUTHAMPTON, ENGLAND
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
When you raise the inner link, that lowers the roll center on that end which gives that end more grip.
I have taken out the risers and fitted carpet towers, i run on the upper hole on the front and the lower on the rear, so what your saying is the front should have more grip because i have raised the link - which lowers the roll centre. if i were to to the same on the back i would essentially have more grip all round. correct?

Also what does moving the camber link out on the rear hub do? raise or lower the roll centre? i have mine on the inner. and what are the effects of this?

Thanks guys, i am only now starting to vaguely understand set-up and want to know what effects lowering and raising the roll centre are. and how i can use them on certain track conditions.
matt_h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 04:53 PM   #16917
Tech Champion
 
Jon Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,658
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_h
I have taken out the risers and fitted carpet towers, i run on the upper hole on the front and the lower on the rear, so what your saying is the front should have more grip because i have raised the link - which lowers the roll centre. if i were to to the same on the back i would essentially have more grip all round. correct?

Also what does moving the camber link out on the rear hub do? raise or lower the roll centre? i have mine on the inner. and what are the effects of this?

Thanks guys, i am only now starting to vaguely understand set-up and want to know what effects lowering and raising the roll centre are. and how i can use them on certain track conditions.
Yes, running the camber links like that should give more steering. If the rear is loose (remember, there's a big difference between having a lot of steering and the car being loose) you can raise the inner link to get more grip in the rear. Lengthening the camber link will also lower the roll center. Pretty much every setup I've seen has the outer link in the inner hole. I tried the outer hole in the hub one time and the car just felt odd so I haven't tried it since. I think changing the length of the link is a more drastic change in the roll center than changing the angle a little.

Basically, a lower roll center will allow that end of the car to roll more. Usually more roll = more grip (to an extent.) And usually a higher roll center will allow that end to roll less, keeping it flatter and yielding less grip. Try and keep the amount of roll balanced front to rear. You don't want the rear to stay too flat and have the front end dumping over or vice versa.
Jon Kerr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 08:11 PM   #16918
Tech Champion
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 7,436
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Chris Goetz- "seaball"- qualifies 3rd in stock foam at the Novak.
__________________
A mutually re-enforcing cascade of failure

"Failior [sic] crowns enterprise." Robert Goddard

I-Lap Scoring Systems http://www.rclapcounter.com/
robk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 08:13 PM   #16919
Tech Champion
 
AdrianM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,914
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robk
Chris Goetz- "seaball"- qualifies 3rd in stock foam at the Novak.
Its going to be a good race. Chris, Jim and Drew are all going the same speed.
__________________
Adrian Martinez
What I run: Schumacher Mi5/Associated RC10R5.1/Associated RC12R5.2/Futaba/HobbyWing/Team EA Motorsports/BSR Racing
Where I run: Florida Indoor R/C Complex/Thunder Racing/Florida On Road State Series
AdrianM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:33 PM   #16920
Tech Lord
 
protc3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Spring Hill,Florida
Posts: 10,820
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

hey adrian,give me a buzz tommorow
__________________
Jason Breiner
BMI Racing
Team Associated
J Concepts
protc3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Corner Dots anyone? RCGaryK Electric On-Road 19 07-04-2006 12:12 AM
On the Corner RC-HPI R/C Photography 0 08-02-2005 11:53 PM
Snowbirds Around the Corner scarecrow Florida Racing 20 01-27-2005 11:43 AM
1/12th Corner GT Racer Singapore R/C Racers 26 03-04-2004 07:59 AM
Shumacher Corner in Aus jamesbaxter_81 Australian Racing 6 01-08-2004 03:36 PM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 09:35 PM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0