Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Traction Rolling >

Traction Rolling

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree5Likes

Traction Rolling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2010, 01:39 PM
  #46  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Lenman73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 459
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Actually thats about the opposite of what I did considering I did have the sway bays are when I did have the TR problems. Look at it like this, when cornering the car wants to roll . Using a setup where the chassis can roll but keep the tires on the ground is achieved by softening. Sway bars are going to limit the chassis ability to roll and that energy is going to want to go somewhere, so up and over it goes. When I took them off, no more TR.
Lenman73 is offline  
Old 01-10-2010, 01:47 PM
  #47  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
Timbulb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,063
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DieselBurner
Get the beefiest sway bar on the market. rolling takes having one side off the ground, sway bars eliminate that.
I disagree.

Originally Posted by Lenman73
Actually thats about the opposite of what I did considering I did have the sway bays are when I did have the TR problems. Look at it like this, when cornering the car wants to roll . Using a setup where the chassis can roll but keep the tires on the ground is achieved by softening. Sway bars are going to limit the chassis ability to roll and that energy is going to want to go somewhere, so up and over it goes. When I took them off, no more TR.
I agree.
Timbulb is offline  
Old 01-10-2010, 03:01 PM
  #48  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 906
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Sounds like your on the right track with what is being said. You might also look into a little more caster possibly. Caster is funny, too little will cause it and too much can contribute also.

Definitely letting the chassis move a little more helps. In my opinion, I like to run a bit softer setup, and then run sway bars to help square it up faster in & out of a turn.
Spdjunky is offline  
Old 01-11-2010, 03:10 AM
  #49  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: AUSTRIA
Posts: 233
Default traction roll

so far from what i understand you guys recommend the following meassures against traction roll (no particular order):

-glue the sidewall of tyres
-softer springs overall (i would add no progressive springs)
-front anti dive
-less camber in front (back?)
-softer swaybars or non at all
-softer oil (eg 450 MuchMore)

what i dont get is the droop setting. would you guys recommend that the suspension arms angle more upward (more preload on damper) or that the arms are angled more downward ??

have i missed anything in the list above??
vitomon is offline  
Old 01-11-2010, 06:49 AM
  #50  
Tech Elite
 
sosidge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 4,438
Default

Sometimes you need to go stiffer to stop traction roll, sometimes you need to go softer. It's frustrating to judge which is the right choice.

If I have any observations, it is that if the car "snaps" into a roll, the car is probably too stiff. If it is "lazy" into a roll, the car is probably too soft.
sosidge is offline  
Old 01-11-2010, 07:32 AM
  #51  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,382
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

on average how much camber have you guys taken away? (so say ran zero camber, then went to -2 camber, etc)
Cain is offline  
Old 01-11-2010, 07:19 PM
  #52  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 906
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by sosidge
Sometimes you need to go stiffer to stop traction roll, sometimes you need to go softer. It's frustrating to judge which is the right choice.

If I have any observations, it is that if the car "snaps" into a roll, the car is probably too stiff. If it is "lazy" into a roll, the car is probably too soft.
Well put!!

+1
Spdjunky is offline  
Old 01-11-2010, 07:21 PM
  #53  
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
 
UltegraSTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,171
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

UltegraSTI is offline  
Old 01-11-2010, 07:25 PM
  #54  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 906
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by vitomon
so far from what i understand you guys recommend the following meassures against traction roll (no particular order):

-glue the sidewall of tyres
-softer springs overall (i would add no progressive springs)
-front anti dive
-less camber in front (back?)
-softer swaybars or non at all
-softer oil (eg 450 MuchMore)

what i dont get is the droop setting. would you guys recommend that the suspension arms angle more upward (more preload on damper) or that the arms are angled more downward ??
Droop is relative to your ride height and traction. I would run at least 2mm droop. The lowest ride height for most classes is I think 4mm. TC I think is 5mm at most clubs.

Originally Posted by vitomon
have i missed anything in the list above??
I kind of like progressive springs, yet I have never used them when traction rolls were an issue.

Softer oils +
Glue the sidewalls - Last ditch choice!! -
Spdjunky is offline  
Old 01-11-2010, 08:15 PM
  #55  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
tom_chang79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,592
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Can't you also take away the droop a bit to lessen traction rolling?
tom_chang79 is offline  
Old 01-11-2010, 08:38 PM
  #56  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 906
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Tom, there is a fine line here also. Take a look what Sosidge wrote.

Most of my experience has been that droop needs to be added though.
Spdjunky is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 12:51 AM
  #57  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: AUSTRIA
Posts: 233
Default

so by "more droop" you actually mean the arms will be more flat/or angled downward??
vitomon is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 04:47 AM
  #58  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 906
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Droop is how much the car will raise up in the front or back, from its current ride height with the tires still touching the surface. Too many other variables affect arm positions, so that is irrelavent.
Spdjunky is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 05:37 AM
  #59  
Tech Elite
 
niznai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: All over the place
Posts: 2,974
Default

Originally Posted by vitomon
so by "more droop" you actually mean the arms will be more flat/or angled downward??
No. The arms will droop more before lifting off the track.

Less droop is not at all what you want. You want more droop as suggested above.
niznai is offline  
Old 01-12-2010, 09:00 AM
  #60  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 678
Trader Rating: 10 (92%+)
Default

Originally Posted by niznai
No. The arms will droop more before lifting off the track.

Less droop is not at all what you want. You want more droop as suggested above.
more droop, so say from 2mm to 3mm for example?

most setups call for internal limiters to reduce droop, which helps reduce traction roll.

this is a paragraph of the setup tips I look at times when im confused:
Adding more internal travel limiters is a very effective way of reducing traction rolls, if not the most effective way.
captain stacker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.