Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
NEW TC design....have a look at this! >

NEW TC design....have a look at this!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

NEW TC design....have a look at this!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2009, 02:55 PM
  #1  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
wingman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tewkesbury, UK via Plymouth, UK.
Posts: 1,259
Default NEW TC design....have a look at this!

Hi guys, I was having a look around the web and found some pics of this new TC car. See what you think and put thoughts on here!







Cheers, Chris.
wingman2 is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 02:58 PM
  #2  
Tech Adept
 
RFALLON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hiram
Posts: 180
Default

It looks pretty much like a type-r, excluding the shocks
RFALLON is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:04 PM
  #3  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (62)
 
The Teacher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,452
Trader Rating: 62 (100%+)
Default

RFALLON, we must not be looking at the same car...

wingman2, where did you find these pics?
The Teacher is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:06 PM
  #4  
Tech Adept
 
RFALLON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hiram
Posts: 180
Default

I think we are. the chassis and belts are almost identical
RFALLON is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:06 PM
  #5  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
a_main_attendee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado, USA, The land of the free and the home of the brave!
Posts: 2,880
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Guys, jesus tapdancing christ.

http://www.rctech.net/forum/electric...ml#post5688563
a_main_attendee is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:07 PM
  #6  
Tech Master
iTrader: (52)
 
JamesArluck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,233
Trader Rating: 52 (100%+)
Default

It looks like someone forgot to put the top deck on their JRXS-R dirt oval conversion..
JamesArluck is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:07 PM
  #7  
Tech Master
iTrader: (47)
 
Scott B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NOR-CAL
Posts: 1,348
Trader Rating: 47 (100%+)
Default

There's already a thread about this car...


http://www.rctech.net/forum/electric...h-lcg-v10.html
Scott B is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:09 PM
  #8  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
a_main_attendee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado, USA, The land of the free and the home of the brave!
Posts: 2,880
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by a_main_attendee
Originally Posted by Scott B
There's already a thread about this car...


http://www.rctech.net/forum/electric...h-lcg-v10.html
Really?
a_main_attendee is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 03:09 PM
  #9  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 97
Default

Whoa, talk about balanced enough :P
grategenin is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 05:40 PM
  #10  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,457
Default

"jesus tapdancing christ"




Originally Posted by a_main_attendee
outlandr91 is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 08:26 PM
  #11  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
94eg!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 832
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Looks interesting. The shocks really should be flipped over 180* to reduce suspension mass. We would rather have the shock piston & rod as part of the suspension mass and not heavy the cylinder & fluid...

That will move the weight further out from the centerline, but suspension mass is probably more important...
94eg! is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 05:58 AM
  #12  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by 94eg!
Looks interesting. The shocks really should be flipped over 180* to reduce suspension mass. We would rather have the shock piston & rod as part of the suspension mass and not heavy the cylinder & fluid...

That will move the weight further out from the centerline, but suspension mass is probably more important...
Don't think so. The shocks are mounted on suspension parts on both sides. All of the shock is unsprung mass!?!




But the Suspension arms are very very short. I think it just works good on very high grip tracks.
Der Dicke is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 06:44 AM
  #13  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (12)
 
RC MARKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 6,279
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

LCG
RC MARKET is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 08:18 AM
  #14  
Tech Adept
 
adri-13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Marseille
Posts: 102
Default

I'm not loving the shock position! It's not efficace
adri-13 is offline  
Old 04-16-2009, 08:28 AM
  #15  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (24)
 
wingracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,737
Trader Rating: 24 (100%+)
Default

I agree, the shocks should be flipped. I can't really tell what the other end is attached to but the shock shaft/piston end should be attached to the bellcrank. Probably makes almost no difference but I'm a perfectionist.

Also, the super short arms are a bit of a worry. Might work well like that though, have to wait and see.
wingracer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.