Tamiya F104 Pro!
#61
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Tamiya doesnt like LiPo so I do not think that they were even thought about for this chassis. Tamiya outlawed LiPos at all Tamiya events and both Tamiya circuits here in Japan a long time ago. Tamiya would really like for you to use LiFe as its safer. I know Tamiya America runs LiPos in TCS but they dont here.
With those thoughts somebody will most likely come along and make a top deck for LiPos like the Orions.
Last edited by bakaguyjean; 05-16-2009 at 02:54 AM. Reason: more thoughts
#62
The Formula 10...
also... @those how are worried about the center mounted battery affecting handling.....there have been plenty of 10-scale touring cars that in their press releases mention that they have moved the batteries closer to center to change the "roll center" of the car... I'm sure if the suspension is set up soft enough, (side to side roll) it will compensate for the closer roll center... just as car with batteries to one side and electronics to the other have/need thicker anti-roll bars to compensate the opposite way...
Cars like the Schumacher Cat SX have the motor and bateries mounted as close to center as possible.... and look at the Lost 8ight and most of the subsequent 8th scale buggies... they all are making a big deal about getting the weight as centered as possible and the are all doing quite well...
I'm sure that tamiya has figured out weight transfer sufficiently
also the car being longer should increase stability.... that's usually a fact.. that's how it is in all forms of automotive things... small and large....
but hey... F1 is supposed to be a challenge to drive... that's why they get paid the big bucks
also... @those how are worried about the center mounted battery affecting handling.....there have been plenty of 10-scale touring cars that in their press releases mention that they have moved the batteries closer to center to change the "roll center" of the car... I'm sure if the suspension is set up soft enough, (side to side roll) it will compensate for the closer roll center... just as car with batteries to one side and electronics to the other have/need thicker anti-roll bars to compensate the opposite way...
Cars like the Schumacher Cat SX have the motor and bateries mounted as close to center as possible.... and look at the Lost 8ight and most of the subsequent 8th scale buggies... they all are making a big deal about getting the weight as centered as possible and the are all doing quite well...
I'm sure that tamiya has figured out weight transfer sufficiently
also the car being longer should increase stability.... that's usually a fact.. that's how it is in all forms of automotive things... small and large....
but hey... F1 is supposed to be a challenge to drive... that's why they get paid the big bucks
Last edited by akura2; 05-16-2009 at 09:49 AM.
#65
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Cars like the Schumacher Cat SX have the motor and bateries mounted as close to center as possible.... and look at the Lost 8ight and most of the subsequent 8th scale buggies... they all are making a big deal about getting the weight as centered as possible and the are all doing quite well...
The F1GP here in Japan and the D-Drive Sports F1 race series are both dominated by rear mounted batteries. Not center batteries. TRG who used to be Nikko 5E used to have a center mount battery,They dumped that idea and use rear mounted batteries on the new chassis. Corally also had a center mount battery on thier first F1 chassis,They also dumped that idea for the current rear mounted battery.
Tamiya went with the center mount battery for current F1 body choices. That makes for a very nice body and that works fine if you TCS and they dump the F103 from TCS like they did before when the F201 came out.
Tech Racing is the only company that is sticking to the center mount battery on the new chassis The BR125.
Real F1 cars also have all the weight in the back. Driver foward is just the crash box and light weight suspension parts.
Not to argue but from past and current experience with F1 RC cars weight in the rear is a good thing.
So I wouldnt sell your F103 untill you get a chace to see whats going on with the F104 in person. Or just own both!! Thats fun also!
#66
Great insight baka! I was wondering about Tamiya dropping the F103 as I am having trouble finding some parts at the online vendors. Most of the things I was looking for were out of stock or on order. I started to get a little worried.
#67
hi, my feel is that the 103 with battery to rear still has a lot of steering. the 104 might take away rear traction, not good. but i still want one
#68
actually, modern F1 cars have more weight on the front
just look when they get picked up by the crane, the nose falls down
or check the speed f1 boards...
just look when they get picked up by the crane, the nose falls down
or check the speed f1 boards...
#69
Tech Champion
Both of these cars are 4WD that are alot different than 2WD Direct Drive F1 cars with limited down force. Some WGT cars have center batteries but the bodies have huge down force. Some 1/12 cars have center batteris but again 1/12th has huge down force.
The F1GP here in Japan and the D-Drive Sports F1 race series are both dominated by rear mounted batteries. Not center batteries. TRG who used to be Nikko 5E used to have a center mount battery,They dumped that idea and use rear mounted batteries on the new chassis. Corally also had a center mount battery on thier first F1 chassis,They also dumped that idea for the current rear mounted battery.
Tamiya went with the center mount battery for current F1 body choices. That makes for a very nice body and that works fine if you TCS and they dump the F103 from TCS like they did before when the F201 came out.
Tech Racing is the only company that is sticking to the center mount battery on the new chassis The BR125.
Real F1 cars also have all the weight in the back. Driver foward is just the crash box and light weight suspension parts.
Not to argue but from past and current experience with F1 RC cars weight in the rear is a good thing.
So I wouldnt sell your F103 untill you get a chace to see whats going on with the F104 in person. Or just own both!! Thats fun also!
The F1GP here in Japan and the D-Drive Sports F1 race series are both dominated by rear mounted batteries. Not center batteries. TRG who used to be Nikko 5E used to have a center mount battery,They dumped that idea and use rear mounted batteries on the new chassis. Corally also had a center mount battery on thier first F1 chassis,They also dumped that idea for the current rear mounted battery.
Tamiya went with the center mount battery for current F1 body choices. That makes for a very nice body and that works fine if you TCS and they dump the F103 from TCS like they did before when the F201 came out.
Tech Racing is the only company that is sticking to the center mount battery on the new chassis The BR125.
Real F1 cars also have all the weight in the back. Driver foward is just the crash box and light weight suspension parts.
Not to argue but from past and current experience with F1 RC cars weight in the rear is a good thing.
So I wouldnt sell your F103 untill you get a chace to see whats going on with the F104 in person. Or just own both!! Thats fun also!
#71
Tech Champion
iTrader: (108)
Champ has it listed @ roughly $150 plus shipping ($50)..so it's cheaper than the F103R...my F103R was $219+$40 body.
http://sv09.wadax.ne.jp/~rc-champ-jp...456283f0d02068
http://sv09.wadax.ne.jp/~rc-champ-jp...456283f0d02068
#73
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
Handling ???
I have read a few opinions on the handling of the F104 compared to the F103. Can someone with the technical knowledge, give a comparison of the 2 based on the information we have so far? F103 (wider & shorter & battery rearward accross chassis) compared to the F104 (Narrower & Longer & battery mounted in the center.
I would think that the wider F103 would be more stable and less twitchy due to the wider footprint. However others have said that the F104 would be easier to driver due to the extra length.
I would think that the wider F103 would be more stable and less twitchy due to the wider footprint. However others have said that the F104 would be easier to driver due to the extra length.
#74
hyde, sometimes rubber tires work better than foams on concrete parking lots. it really depends and only answer is to try. loose diff might help as it acts like a slipper in bumpy conditions to maintain traction.
JayL, maybe the hook where crane picks up car is not centered and more to the rear, hence nose down when picked up. i would guess weight is 40/60 front/rear. engine/transmission/bigger tires/driver are all towards rear.
JayL, maybe the hook where crane picks up car is not centered and more to the rear, hence nose down when picked up. i would guess weight is 40/60 front/rear. engine/transmission/bigger tires/driver are all towards rear.
#75
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
Champ has it listed @ roughly $150 plus shipping ($50)..so it's cheaper than the F103R...my F103R was $219+$40 body.
http://sv09.wadax.ne.jp/~rc-champ-jp...456283f0d02068
http://sv09.wadax.ne.jp/~rc-champ-jp...456283f0d02068