lrp spx stock spec
#391
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
what's the difference between this SPXs..?
LRP SPX Brushless Competition StockSpec
and
SPX Brushless Bullet Reverse
i'm confused now on which is the right now..
what do you guys have?
EDIT: Typo.. and narrowed it down a little.
LRP SPX Brushless Competition StockSpec
and
SPX Brushless Bullet Reverse
i'm confused now on which is the right now..
what do you guys have?
EDIT: Typo.. and narrowed it down a little.
Last edited by Minami; 06-13-2009 at 03:30 AM.
#394
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
what's the difference between this SPXs..?
LRP SPX Brushless Competition StockSpec
and
SPX Brushless Bullet Reverse
i'm confused now on which is the right now..
what do you guys have?
EDIT: Typo.. and narrowed it down a little.
LRP SPX Brushless Competition StockSpec
and
SPX Brushless Bullet Reverse
i'm confused now on which is the right now..
what do you guys have?
EDIT: Typo.. and narrowed it down a little.
#397
Tech Rookie
SPX on tight tracks
I've read all the threads with interest, and have my spx coming! (Getting really frustrated with my GTB !)
I've noted the comments that the spx seems best on the longer tracks where you can utilise the extended rpm range. What is the experience of guys running on tight, technical tracks? If you gear to use the extended rpm range, are you losing the advantage of lower-geared torque out of the corners due to wheelspin?
I've noted the comments that the spx seems best on the longer tracks where you can utilise the extended rpm range. What is the experience of guys running on tight, technical tracks? If you gear to use the extended rpm range, are you losing the advantage of lower-geared torque out of the corners due to wheelspin?
#398
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
Also, I think running the heatsink on my SPX makes it fade less. That's totally subjective, but I swear it runs better now.
#399
Tech Elite
iTrader: (109)
That's not exactly true. It's a double-sided thermal tape designed to conduct heat. Normal tape won't work at all. I went through a whole learning process on this when the heatsink fell off my TC Spec.
Also, I think running the heatsink on my SPX makes it fade less. That's totally subjective, but I swear it runs better now.
Also, I think running the heatsink on my SPX makes it fade less. That's totally subjective, but I swear it runs better now.
#400
I've read all the threads with interest, and have my spx coming! (Getting really frustrated with my GTB !)
I've noted the comments that the spx seems best on the longer tracks where you can utilise the extended rpm range. What is the experience of guys running on tight, technical tracks? If you gear to use the extended rpm range, are you losing the advantage of lower-geared torque out of the corners due to wheelspin?
I've noted the comments that the spx seems best on the longer tracks where you can utilise the extended rpm range. What is the experience of guys running on tight, technical tracks? If you gear to use the extended rpm range, are you losing the advantage of lower-geared torque out of the corners due to wheelspin?
It also seems to be easier to get too much heat build-up in the motors.
Try gearing on profile 6 and get the temps right, then go up to profile 7 but go down at least 2 teeth on the gearing.
Again keep an eye on the temps.
If the track you're on is too tight profile 8 will be of no use.
Profile 7 might be beyond it as well.
Skiddins
#401
ok we tried the SPX stock spec today and i am dissapointed
we have changed from TC specs to the stock spec and we programmed to program 8 and tried every gearing from 5.7 to 4.2 and still between 1 and 6/10ths slower then the GM120 powered cars !!!!!
they used to be able to pull 2 to 3 meters on our back straight now they only pull 1 to 2 and they have the same sort of punch on the infield we have
i dont know the motor temps yet but i will update as soon as i speak with my mate
our gearing on the TC spec was 3.7 and we use either a 10.5 with 5 cells or a 13.5 with lipos
please help as i am wondering if i should have bought the GM120 !!!
thanks Phil
we have changed from TC specs to the stock spec and we programmed to program 8 and tried every gearing from 5.7 to 4.2 and still between 1 and 6/10ths slower then the GM120 powered cars !!!!!
they used to be able to pull 2 to 3 meters on our back straight now they only pull 1 to 2 and they have the same sort of punch on the infield we have
i dont know the motor temps yet but i will update as soon as i speak with my mate
our gearing on the TC spec was 3.7 and we use either a 10.5 with 5 cells or a 13.5 with lipos
please help as i am wondering if i should have bought the GM120 !!!
thanks Phil
#402
ok we tried the SPX stock spec today and i am dissapointed
we have changed from TC specs to the stock spec and we programmed to program 8 and tried every gearing from 5.7 to 4.2 and still between 1 and 6/10ths slower then the GM120 powered cars !!!!!
they used to be able to pull 2 to 3 meters on our back straight now they only pull 1 to 2 and they have the same sort of punch on the infield we have
i dont know the motor temps yet but i will update as soon as i speak with my mate
our gearing on the TC spec was 3.7 and we use either a 10.5 with 5 cells or a 13.5 with lipos
please help as i am wondering if i should have bought the GM120 !!!
thanks Phil
we have changed from TC specs to the stock spec and we programmed to program 8 and tried every gearing from 5.7 to 4.2 and still between 1 and 6/10ths slower then the GM120 powered cars !!!!!
they used to be able to pull 2 to 3 meters on our back straight now they only pull 1 to 2 and they have the same sort of punch on the infield we have
i dont know the motor temps yet but i will update as soon as i speak with my mate
our gearing on the TC spec was 3.7 and we use either a 10.5 with 5 cells or a 13.5 with lipos
please help as i am wondering if i should have bought the GM120 !!!
thanks Phil
battery is definitely one.............
also 1 to 2 meter down the straight will never put a difference of 6 tenths, so this gap comes from other losses around the track and not necessarly from poor speedo performance......
is everybody using the same motor and mechanical timing??
did you try profile 7 or even 6? sometimes profile 8 is best suitable to fast flowing layouts or long straight..........
again, battery plays a big part on this, I can say a TC Spec with good batteries can easily beat the SPX with so so batteries
#403
I've read all the threads with interest, and have my spx coming! (Getting really frustrated with my GTB !)
I've noted the comments that the spx seems best on the longer tracks where you can utilise the extended rpm range. What is the experience of guys running on tight, technical tracks? If you gear to use the extended rpm range, are you losing the advantage of lower-geared torque out of the corners due to wheelspin?
I've noted the comments that the spx seems best on the longer tracks where you can utilise the extended rpm range. What is the experience of guys running on tight, technical tracks? If you gear to use the extended rpm range, are you losing the advantage of lower-geared torque out of the corners due to wheelspin?
I see this is your first post. It is a good question; but, without you having provided any information about your car, motor, battery, tires, track (asphalt or carpet), etc. we cannot respond with any certainty that we will hit the target. Please clarify further...
Cheers!
Bill
#404
there are many other factors............
battery is definitely one.............
also 1 to 2 meter down the straight will never put a difference of 6 tenths, so this gap comes from other losses around the track and not necessarly from poor speedo performance......
is everybody using the same motor and mechanical timing??
did you try profile 7 or even 6? sometimes profile 8 is best suitable to fast flowing layouts or long straight..........
again, battery plays a big part on this, I can say a TC Spec with good batteries can easily beat the SPX with so so batteries
battery is definitely one.............
also 1 to 2 meter down the straight will never put a difference of 6 tenths, so this gap comes from other losses around the track and not necessarly from poor speedo performance......
is everybody using the same motor and mechanical timing??
did you try profile 7 or even 6? sometimes profile 8 is best suitable to fast flowing layouts or long straight..........
again, battery plays a big part on this, I can say a TC Spec with good batteries can easily beat the SPX with so so batteries
please help i am really struggling to set this speedo up ???
#405
to turn the ring and advance the timing you have to loosen the 3 screws of the back plate........
I can't help you much because I don't run 5-cell, with 7.4v lipo and lrp 10.5 motor you can gear the motor at 6.5~7.0fdr if the track is small..........try power profiles 7 and 8..........