Community
Wiki Posts
Search

15.5 Brushless?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2008, 10:49 PM
  #1  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (64)
 
SpraydbySprague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Conducting aggressive board meetings at my local track
Posts: 3,301
Trader Rating: 64 (100%+)
Default 15.5 Brushless?

Ok so here's the story. A fellow 1/12 scale racer and I were discussing 27t brushed vs 17.5 brushless. We both agreed the 27t brushed were faster than the 17.5. This got us thinking. What about a brushless 15.5 motor? Would it be closer to a 27t brushed? I simply came up with 15.5 because it falls right between a 13.5 and a 17.5. Many drivers claim the 13.5 was too fast against the 27t brushed. I just started running brushless and we all run 17.5 as a stock equivalent, so I never tried the 13.5 at all. Let's hear your opinion. Who knows, maybe the motor manufacturers will pick up on this.
SpraydbySprague is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 10:58 PM
  #2  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (51)
 
mike ivy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Comin at ya from a distant galaxy
Posts: 2,930
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)
Default

Yea baby sounds good to me
mike ivy is offline  
Old 11-01-2008, 11:22 PM
  #3  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
SWTour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hot Mountains of S.E. Arizona
Posts: 3,014
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

the question is...do you need a motor that is faster than the 17.5?

The reason I say that is this...

People running 27t have had YEARS to perfect their setups and rollouts for it...

Take a 17.5 and just spend ONE year with it and see where you end up in 12 months.

If you start with something faster (ie: 15.5) within that same year...it will probably end up too fast for a good part of the crowd.

Look at how much faster the 27t's became over the past 12-15 years. (not to mention how much speed they picked up with batteries continuing to progress)

I'd bet if you look at todays STOCK speeds compared to 8 - 10 years ago...todays STOCK 1/12th speeds would probably look like MOD speeds of 1998
SWTour is offline  
Old 11-02-2008, 06:05 AM
  #4  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (64)
 
SpraydbySprague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Conducting aggressive board meetings at my local track
Posts: 3,301
Trader Rating: 64 (100%+)
Default

The reason is to find a brushless motor that is closer in performance to a brushed stock than the current 17.5 motors we now run.

If everyone kept asking "why do we need a faster (insert any product here)?" This hobby just might not have become what it is today.

True, it might be too fast for some ppl, but it's no different than saying open electric mod is too fast for some ppl. Which is why all these options of stock, mod, 19t, and brushless exist.

It's these options and their ability to allow ppl to start this hobby and grow with it which makes it fun. I'm just trying to see if maybe there can be other options.
SpraydbySprague is offline  
Old 11-02-2008, 09:50 AM
  #5  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (42)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: anywhere I can race 2wd dirt,and 1/12 onroad in MI.
Posts: 3,891
Trader Rating: 42 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE=

I'd bet if you look at todays STOCK speeds compared to 8 - 10 years ago...todays STOCK 1/12th speeds would probably look like MOD speeds of 1998[/QUOTE] As usual Joe you speak from years of experience and i really think you are right.I know your series along with the BRL worked with novak to develop the 17.5 for a stock equivalent. And really you are absolutely right, I have been running a 17.5 in 1/12 for a little over a year now and Have made it MUCH faster through gearing and coming to know how to use the torque characteristics of the motor to reach the speeds I was running with a 27T brrushed motor.After playing with a 17.5 for a year I think I could make a 15.5 be way faster than a 27 turn brushed within 1 day of practice/ tuning.
2wdMod is offline  
Old 11-02-2008, 10:51 AM
  #6  
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
sportpak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,314
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Everyone has to get over the fact that 17.5 is a little different. No brushless motor is ever going to feel like a 27t brushed. Like stated earlier, give it a year and I bet your 17.5 is faster then any 27t.

Different is just different. Different is fresh and tasty. Just go with it.
sportpak is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 02:50 PM
  #7  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (64)
 
SpraydbySprague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Conducting aggressive board meetings at my local track
Posts: 3,301
Trader Rating: 64 (100%+)
Default

Well, if, with proper time and practice a 17.5 will yield better lap times than a 27t brushed motor, then at what point and time will drivers want more? More performance, speed, and better lap times. And what would the manufacturers come up with to satisfy this need?
SpraydbySprague is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 03:24 PM
  #8  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,799
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

a 13.5?
stitchy is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 03:33 PM
  #9  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (64)
 
SpraydbySprague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Conducting aggressive board meetings at my local track
Posts: 3,301
Trader Rating: 64 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by stitchy
a 13.5?
13.5 has been designated as "super stock". I'm referring to what is currently "stock" equiavalent. However most racers I've talked to do agree the 13.5 was better for a "stock" equivalent. However, ROAR rules have already taken care of 13.5 brushless.
SpraydbySprague is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 03:39 PM
  #10  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (42)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: anywhere I can race 2wd dirt,and 1/12 onroad in MI.
Posts: 3,891
Trader Rating: 42 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by SpraydbySprague
Well, if, with proper time and practice a 17.5 will yield better lap times than a 27t brushed motor, then at what point and time will drivers want more? More performance, speed, and better lap times. And what would the manufacturers come up with to satisfy this need?
No need to go faster in stock. If you want to go faster bump up and run mod with the big boys, or run super stock.
2wdMod is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 04:06 PM
  #11  
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
sportpak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,314
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 2wdMod
No need to go faster in stock. If you want to go faster bump up and run mod with the big boys, or run super stock.
Exactly, stock is still almost too fast for it's own good. Super stock is a reasonable step up. Mod is almost stupid fast, but that's what mod is, all or nothing.
sportpak is offline  
Old 11-03-2008, 04:33 PM
  #12  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,799
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 2wdMod
No need to go faster in stock. If you want to go faster bump up and run mod with the big boys, or run super stock.
umm..yeah, that was my point
stitchy is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.