Tekin RS ESC sensored
I did'nt find any setup sheet on the Tekin website for a 4WD offroad buggy with a RS Pro, the vegas 2.0 software and a Tekin 6.5 Redline motor. Can anybody give me some advices ? thanks in advance
Tech Elite
iTrader: (19)
Thanks Randy but I don't understand how you can have a timing advance at 70 with the v203 software version ?
Tech Lord
iTrader: (103)
Tech Rookie
Id like to be able to save multiple hotwire setups to the esc so i can change mid event. Unless you have a laptop this is a real concern, you dont know if you days racing at a new track will be wrecked by picking a setup which isnt quite right.
Anything like this in the pipework?
Anything like this in the pipework?
Tech Lord
iTrader: (103)
Tech Master
Tech Master
The ETS is started again and after the practice Carsten Madsen is 3rd.
Tech Master
Tech Regular
has anyone got a good starting setup and gearing using a new gm starwind 13.5
heres the track i b racing on
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPq7u...eature=related
thats not my car going round it just give the idea of the size of the track i race on
thanks for any help
heres the track i b racing on
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPq7u...eature=related
thats not my car going round it just give the idea of the size of the track i race on
thanks for any help
Last edited by mwoods; 03-05-2010 at 01:03 PM.
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
You do not want the boost off, but you do want it reduced. You should not have the extreme timing active when the motor is at its slowest rpms. It is like driving a corvette at 10mph in third gear. We shift as we accel is the idea.
That super slow boost engage profile was for the 6lb SC 4x4 as an example of the other extreme from a light 1/12 scale with direct drive. As you add timing you gain rpm and loose torque. You can get away with less torque in a light car and add the timing a lot faster and at lower rpms.
That super slow boost engage profile was for the 6lb SC 4x4 as an example of the other extreme from a light 1/12 scale with direct drive. As you add timing you gain rpm and loose torque. You can get away with less torque in a light car and add the timing a lot faster and at lower rpms.
We are stuck with some nerd math restrictions to make it happen fast enough. Move the top around a little and all the bottom rpms can be achieved. As the top rpm goes up and down the start rpms move with it.
An observant person might notice the pattern: 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048.... Look familiar from computer specs?
Actually there is some other math in there so it is not really that obvious now that I look at and there are some gaps that are hard to achieve. But the reasoning for the choices is valid.
An observant person might notice the pattern: 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048.... Look familiar from computer specs?
Actually there is some other math in there so it is not really that obvious now that I look at and there are some gaps that are hard to achieve. But the reasoning for the choices is valid.
Last edited by Tekin Prez; 03-05-2010 at 01:24 PM.