Should Sedan Min weight Be Lowered?
#1
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
Should Sedan Min weight Be Lowered?
I have been thinking about this for a while and I want to know what others think.
Should the the min weight be lowered? If so how much? 100grams? 150grams? more?
Lowering the min weight will help the transistion from NiMH to LiPO happen faster without making a LiPO only rule.
The lower weight will increase the durablilty of the cars.
The lower weight will help keep the outrageous large capacity LiPO's from being used. 3200mah should be enough for a 5min race.
Should the the min weight be lowered? If so how much? 100grams? 150grams? more?
Lowering the min weight will help the transistion from NiMH to LiPO happen faster without making a LiPO only rule.
The lower weight will increase the durablilty of the cars.
The lower weight will help keep the outrageous large capacity LiPO's from being used. 3200mah should be enough for a 5min race.
#2
i agree with your points but lowering the weight will make it unfair to those who choose to continue to run NIMH
#4
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
I think for 2009 we need to make the rules for just lipo at lighter weights.
There is no disadvantage for any cars as all you have to do is scoot your lipo over ~3mm to balance the car with the lighter battery...no muss no fuss.
I run 5000mah Core packs. I run 10.5 and Mod so I have no interest in smaller packs
There is no disadvantage for any cars as all you have to do is scoot your lipo over ~3mm to balance the car with the lighter battery...no muss no fuss.
I run 5000mah Core packs. I run 10.5 and Mod so I have no interest in smaller packs
#6
I think the minimum weight should be lowered for TC (carpet and asphalt).
It simply makes things easier. I haven't personally balanced a TC for LiPo yet...but I have seen a lot of guys making all of these crazy custom milled weights and buying special weights that stick on to each of their batteries (not necessarily to balance the car I guess, but just to reach min weight). As someone else said...I know that lowering the weight would kind of isolate the guys still running NiMHs ... but I think that, like switching from NiCd to NiMH, switching from NiMH to LiPo will be a positive direction for the hobby.
However, I as well don't think there should be a limit on the LiPos....I guess the main reason I think this is that if things like mAh rating start getting restricted in races, then I think we are also somewhat indirectly restricting the ability of the hobby to grow, racing or otherwise.
It simply makes things easier. I haven't personally balanced a TC for LiPo yet...but I have seen a lot of guys making all of these crazy custom milled weights and buying special weights that stick on to each of their batteries (not necessarily to balance the car I guess, but just to reach min weight). As someone else said...I know that lowering the weight would kind of isolate the guys still running NiMHs ... but I think that, like switching from NiCd to NiMH, switching from NiMH to LiPo will be a positive direction for the hobby.
However, I as well don't think there should be a limit on the LiPos....I guess the main reason I think this is that if things like mAh rating start getting restricted in races, then I think we are also somewhat indirectly restricting the ability of the hobby to grow, racing or otherwise.
#7
Tech Champion
iTrader: (208)
Leave the weight where it is at. Until only lipo packs are available then maybe the weight should be changed. To balance the car from side to side you still need to add weight. That is if the electronics and motor are on the other side.
Also lower weight means it will be harder to lock into a setup for a car on a given track. This is especially true of offroad.
Also lower weight means it will be harder to lock into a setup for a car on a given track. This is especially true of offroad.
#8
I believe that the weight should be lowered to 1100 grams. An 1100 gram car w/ a 19 turn motor will go toe to toe w/ a 1450 gram car w/ a gtb 3.5. Simply put
-5 gp 3300s only weighs about 280 grams.
-3/4ths less stress on parts
-3/4ths the energy needed to go
-tcs will still drive around a track w/ a bad setup, & if less weight will make setups harder to come up with then it should help to make setups knowledge more important.
-lower discharge batteries needed
-5 gp 3300s only weighs about 280 grams.
-3/4ths less stress on parts
-3/4ths the energy needed to go
-tcs will still drive around a track w/ a bad setup, & if less weight will make setups harder to come up with then it should help to make setups knowledge more important.
-lower discharge batteries needed
#9
I believe that the weight should be lowered to 1100 grams. An 1100 gram car w/ a 19 turn motor will go toe to toe w/ a 1450 gram car w/ a gtb 3.5. Simply put
-5 gp 3300s only weighs about 280 grams.
-3/4ths less stress on parts
-3/4ths the energy needed to go
-tcs will still drive around a track w/ a bad setup, & if less weight will make setups harder to come up with then it should help to make setups knowledge more important.
-lower discharge batteries needed
-5 gp 3300s only weighs about 280 grams.
-3/4ths less stress on parts
-3/4ths the energy needed to go
-tcs will still drive around a track w/ a bad setup, & if less weight will make setups harder to come up with then it should help to make setups knowledge more important.
-lower discharge batteries needed
In my opinion I think the weight should be lowered maybe 100 grams? That would be easy for everyone and should make racing a bit more exciting.
#10
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
Newton's second law of motion pertains to the behavior of objects for which all existing forces are not balanced. The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object. The acceleration of an object depends directly upon the net force acting upon the object, and inversely upon the mass of the object. As the force acting upon an object is increased, the acceleration of the object is increased. As the mass of an object is increased, the acceleration of the object is decreased.
Eye on the wording about force, as noted above, it is not weigh, rather than Mass that is the true "weight of an item." Weight is relative to the amount of gravitational force pulling down on an item. An object with the same mass for example, weights less on the moon that it does on earth even though it still has the same amount of mass.
Therefore, the heavier the car, the more mass it has, the more force there is on an impact...
Eye on the wording about force, as noted above, it is not weigh, rather than Mass that is the true "weight of an item." Weight is relative to the amount of gravitational force pulling down on an item. An object with the same mass for example, weights less on the moon that it does on earth even though it still has the same amount of mass.
Therefore, the heavier the car, the more mass it has, the more force there is on an impact...
#13