Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
CRC 1/10 Pan Car >

CRC 1/10 Pan Car

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree3Likes

CRC 1/10 Pan Car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2012, 12:21 AM
  #2596  
Tech Apprentice
 
westy1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 83
Default

I suggest a wider and stronger motor pod for a 3.5t motor
westy1969 is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 01:08 AM
  #2597  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 126
Default

Originally Posted by Still Bill
I believe you will find these plates shown in the original Gen-X 10 Pro manual (on the CRC website). Probably not in the LE manual. They should be stacked under the larger plates to allow you to run larger front tires on you car without adding other shims to get to proper front ride height.
so they are just acting as another set of spacers then. I will check with the exceed tires I have to see if I need them. Thanks.
one-nil is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 01:19 AM
  #2598  
Tech Master
 
2wdrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by XesbyecroF
thanks bill..guys what pinion do you suggest for a 1/8 track 2s lipo 3.5t motor 64p 88spur?
What westy says


But if you want to use the extentions then for a ballpark gues rollout between 25 and 28 mm depending on circuit. You should use 48dp spurs and pinions.

Replace the 1/12 centershock with a touringcar shock if you haven't already. The 1/12 shock is too weak for a 2s lipo heavy car.
2wdrive is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 07:05 AM
  #2599  
Tech Initiate
 
XesbyecroF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 20
Default

Originally Posted by 2wdrive
What westy says


But if you want to use the extentions then for a ballpark gues rollout between 25 and 28 mm depending on circuit. You should use 48dp spurs and pinions.

Replace the 1/12 centershock with a touringcar shock if you haven't already. The 1/12 shock is too weak for a 2s lipo heavy car.

thanks..i just changed to 48p replace the shock..but i feel that my spur is going back and forward is that right?kimbrough spur with 1229 part balls..i think that the pod is small for big pinion..
XesbyecroF is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 08:35 AM
  #2600  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 220
Default

finally got round to doing a blog update!

http://rcgtpancars.blogspot.com/
chris_blakey is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 11:05 AM
  #2601  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
joeymdz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oreogan
Posts: 2,993
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by chris_blakey
finally got round to doing a blog update!

http://rcgtpancars.blogspot.com/
i like your blogs

PS~ love the pod plate! (troy is a good friend of mine)


also change out that rear shock to the encore. for me it was a night and day difference in performance compared to the losi. plus you'll loose a few grams

nice paint!

Last edited by joeymdz; 01-12-2012 at 11:17 AM.
joeymdz is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 07:02 PM
  #2602  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by XesbyecroF
thanks bill..guys what pinion do you suggest for a 1/8 track 2s lipo 3.5t motor 64p 88spur?
I do not know anyone running that combination. If you plan on racing at some point in time, I suggest following the motor/battery configuration that is being run at your local track.

Bill
Still Bill is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 07:15 PM
  #2603  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by chris_blakey
finally got round to doing a blog update!

http://rcgtpancars.blogspot.com/
Chris,

Thanks for updating your blog.

Have been running the reversed flat servo mount since September. At the IIC. Frank C had the production parts for me; so, my cars are like yours.

One suggestion...Try to get the steering links to be at the same angle as the upper arms for less toe change as the suspension moves (per Frank). I achieved this by custom drilling a Kimbrough #200 Mid-Sized Servo Saver with the appropriate hole positions (located closer to the inward pre-drilled holes of the #201 servo saver).

Again...Beautiful blog.

Bill

Last edited by Still Bill; 01-12-2012 at 07:33 PM.
Still Bill is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 08:01 PM
  #2604  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (13)
 
joeymdz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oreogan
Posts: 2,993
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

I used a 12th scale servo saver.. The turnbuckels are not flat.. I have some bump steer but i learned to drive with it... And its nice (less camber works) really nice!

Ps-bill... How many grams difference is the losi shock vs. The encore
joeymdz is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 08:41 PM
  #2605  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by joeymdz
I used a 12th scale servo saver.. The turnbuckels are not flat.. I have some bump steer but i learned to drive with it... And its nice (less camber works) really nice!

Ps-bill... How many grams difference is the losi shock vs. The encore
With the new reversed flat servo mounting, I was able to add camber to carry more speed through the corners...LOL.

Not so worried about the Losi shock's weight because it still can be used on a heavier 2S powered WGT. Just needs to be blueprinted by cleaning the flashing off of its piston.

But, I only run Encores on my two 1S cars.

Bill
Still Bill is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 08:49 PM
  #2606  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Chris,

The mount holes in the reversed flat plate are for JR, KO and Futaba mini servos.

Try the CRC long upper arms for less camber change in high traction conditions. I have them on almost all the time. And they have holes to convert to standard length arms with a little bit of work.

Bill
Still Bill is offline  
Old 01-13-2012, 01:29 AM
  #2607  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 220
Default

Hi Bill,

Cheers for that, will look into the long arm conversion in the future. I think the car is going great now its just me that needs more practice!

I am happy with the shock and the car so will leave the shock for the time being!

Trying to get as much track time as possible but work and family get in the way! Been trying VRC with the 1/12th to make sure my thumbs dont go rusty. Not quite the same but helps.
chris_blakey is offline  
Old 01-13-2012, 04:20 AM
  #2608  
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New Bern, N.C.
Posts: 1,700
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default bump steer

chris,
in looking thru your blog photos, it appears that the outer ends of your tierods are a fair amount lower than the inner (servo saver) end since the addition of the flat mounted servo. As you have already noted, this will create bump steer. It is simple enough to ease that problem substantially just by installing taller ball studs on the steering blocks. Thankfully, with the large inner diameter of the 1/10th scale wheels, there's plenty of room to use quite a tall ballstud without causing any interference problems.
Happy motoring...
Originally Posted by chris_blakey
Hi Bill,

Cheers for that, will look into the long arm conversion in the future. I think the car is going great now its just me that needs more practice!

I am happy with the shock and the car so will leave the shock for the time being!

Trying to get as much track time as possible but work and family get in the way! Been trying VRC with the 1/12th to make sure my thumbs dont go rusty. Not quite the same but helps.
vafactor is offline  
Old 01-13-2012, 04:49 AM
  #2609  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 220
Default

Hi,

You would have thought that but I have raised the ball studs as much as I can without them touching the wheels. I use the middle hole on the steering block. I don't believe I have up close pics of that on there but they are there. Like I said its not far of level now and I am loving the way the car is handling at the minute!
chris_blakey is offline  
Old 01-13-2012, 06:41 AM
  #2610  
Tech Initiate
 
XesbyecroF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Still Bill
I do not know anyone running that combination. If you plan on racing at some point in time, I suggest following the motor/battery configuration that is being run at your local track.

Bill
noone?i think that in germany some guys run this with 4.5t motors in 2s asphalt?i didnt buy this for racing just for fun in the track..we dont have so many pancars here but i will gather some guys(some saying that 3.5t is to fast for pancar and asphalt...we will see) ....thanks bill
XesbyecroF is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.