R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-19-2009, 03:02 PM   #8881
Tech Fanatic
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 945
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

The M05 has a sleeker, flatter, lower design to it.

the only thing changed from that M03 is the servo. The M05 has lower slanted shock towers and its more of a wider chassis. All that plays a part in lower COG.
__________________
MyForum> www.uncovertruth.forumotion.com
Hyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 03:34 PM   #8882
Tech Elite
 
tony gray's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Posts: 3,210
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Ummm, slanted shocks actually don't work as well as the upright ones. They tend to pivot around the upper mount instead of compressing. Slightly more progressive yes, but in reality not actually as good as the upright ones.

Wider chassis? Well I think not. Suspension is identical. (apart from the slanty shocks/towers) so the chassis itself would therefore be the same width.

I know you're excited about this car, but it's not any advancement really. It's just something a little different.
tony gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 03:35 PM   #8883
Tech Champion
 
monkeyracing's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SnowMexico
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

I don't think the M-05 is going to be any wider, and by lowering the servo you're only gaining a tiny advantage in terms of COG.

It actually looks to me like they took the best ideas from the M-03 and stuck the servo in the back like the M-01.

I'm only hoping that they use the same gears and suspension bits. I'd hate to think that I'd have to buy all kinds of new stuff just to make it work.

Jim
__________________
Stab it and steer.
monkeyracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 03:52 PM   #8884
Tech Fanatic
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 945
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

It looks like a Wider chassis IMO...not wider track width...

The slanted shocks will be better for the foam/carpet guys for hanging the sharp high grip turns. But with high grip tracks I'm thinking it would offer better, faster, tighter turns...

Also putting that stearing push-rob right down the centre of the car will have people putting there electronics in the rear-sides giving it more COG que no?


Tony, I'm excited about this new M-chassis....but can you blame me?! I'm sure your people are all excited aswell
__________________
MyForum> www.uncovertruth.forumotion.com
Hyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 04:40 PM   #8885
Tech Regular
 
Phat-Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: los Angeles, Ca. U.S.A.
Posts: 406
Trader Rating: 25 (96%+)
Default tamiya tires

i have tamiya m grip and s grip tires witch one is softer? i cann't tell a diffrance between them due to my thick skin on finger
Phat-Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 05:12 PM   #8886
NT
Tech Elite
 
NT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,507
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LATC3 View Post
It looks like a Wider chassis IMO...not wider track width...

The slanted shocks will be better for the foam/carpet guys for hanging the sharp high grip turns. But with high grip tracks I'm thinking it would offer better, faster, tighter turns...

Also putting that stearing push-rob right down the centre of the car will have people putting there electronics in the rear-sides giving it more COG que no?


Tony, I'm excited about this new M-chassis....but can you blame me?! I'm sure your people are all excited aswell
I think you'll find that a majority of the RC-Mini crew are not chomping at the bit to get the 05 at all. In fact, most of them are very disappointed with the new car - mostly because it isn't that revolutionary
NT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 05:51 PM   #8887
Tech Apprentice
 
ScionBox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NT View Post
In fact, most of them are very disappointed with the new car - mostly because it isn't that revolutionary
I am actually glad it is not that revolutionary.... IMO the ONLY thing wrong with the current M03 is the silly servo mounting position... so why change the whole chassis that much? I plan on buying an M05 and plopping a Datsun 510 shell on it with this paint job:
ScionBox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 06:38 PM   #8888
Tech Elite
 
tony gray's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Posts: 3,210
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Well, we couldn't leave well enough alone could we.

We hated giving the HPI Switch such a bad review. So....



Go HERE now to read Pt II - The next day....
tony gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 09:13 PM   #8889
Tech Master
 
edwintklee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: wonderfull place called, MALAYSIA.
Posts: 1,592
Trader Rating: 23 (96%+)
Default

hmm... as M05pro, i hope to be able to use my M03R hop up on it, also to minimise or do not traction roll at all,

its above happen i will be a very happy man.....
__________________
I am a Red Star, Blue Star, Fans......
edwintklee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 09:38 PM   #8890
Tech Champion
 
monkeyracing's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SnowMexico
Posts: 5,837
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony gray View Post
Well, we couldn't leave well enough alone could we.

We hated giving the HPI Switch such a bad review. So...
Glad to hear it's not all bad.
__________________
Stab it and steer.
monkeyracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 12:10 AM   #8891
Tech Fanatic
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 945
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NT View Post
I think you'll find that a majority of the RC-Mini crew are not chomping at the bit to get the 05 at all. In fact, most of them are very disappointed with the new car - mostly because it isn't that revolutionary
Different strokes for different folks. I'm stoked.

And the M05Pro is 100% revolutionized in my book. There's not one thing that's shaped the same as the m03 only ill say maybe c-hubs, uprights and suspension parts.

edwin I'm sure there's going to be m03 parts that are going to fit. I don't think they will come out with a whole new line of parts to sell...unless they wanna milk us like silly cows...
__________________
MyForum> www.uncovertruth.forumotion.com
Hyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 12:16 AM   #8892
Tech Master
 
sim600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,624
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Send a message via ICQ to sim600
Default

M05 design process.

Problem 1: M03 Servo too high.
Solution: Move servo lower.

Problem 2: Motor in the way
Solution: put servo in the back

Problem 3: Servo cannot access steering
Solution: Stand servo back up, add long tie rod, add steering bellcranks

Problem 4: Motor in the ideal spot for steering bellcrank mounting spots
Solution: Move the bellcrank fowards

Problem 5: Steer rods now slightly out of line with knuckles
Solution: Have the steer rods sweep backwards to meet knuckle

Problem 6: Ackermann now all weird
Solution: Focus marketing campaign on the benefits of lower CG
sim600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 12:26 AM   #8893
Tech Fanatic
 
Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 945
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sim600 View Post
Focus marketing campaign on the benefits of lower CG
And i like stated before. For more wider body selection for sleek looking shells.

Now we could put the HPI Z body on it
__________________
MyForum> www.uncovertruth.forumotion.com

Last edited by Hyde; 04-20-2009 at 12:52 AM.
Hyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 12:34 AM   #8894
Tech Regular
 
Phat-Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: los Angeles, Ca. U.S.A.
Posts: 406
Trader Rating: 25 (96%+)
Default m06

m06 next year maybe?
Phat-Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 12:35 AM   #8895
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,920
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

M03 4wd conversion !!!

i knew i had seen it some where

http://www.rcmart.com/catalog/rc-tec...2-p-21980.html

looks fun BUT it's not a Mini
sidecarphil1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tamiya Mini Cooper M-03L Hop-ups mini71 R/C Items: Wanted to Buy 4 05-04-2016 11:07 AM
Tamiya Mini Cooper mach51 R/C Items: Wanted to Buy 10 09-02-2011 12:08 AM
FS:TAMIYA Mini Cooper, TA 04S rthmotorsports R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 4 10-20-2007 09:37 PM
Tamiya 415 MSX and M03 Mini Cooper F/S Racer X79 R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 14 12-22-2006 07:38 AM
Tamiya M01,02,03, or 04 Mini Cooper ccugolf.com R/C Items: Wanted to Buy 2 12-05-2004 08:55 PM


Tags
m03, m03r ules, m05, mini, tamiya


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 13 (3 members and 10 guests)
CSeils, Timbulb, TR21X1
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 07:37 AM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0