R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

Like Tree3Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-21-2009, 09:42 AM   #5971
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,920
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

dont think it will make the chassis more flexable ,

the front / rear mount is only touching in 2 small places these are connected by 4 and a larger contact area
sidecarphil1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 09:46 AM   #5972
Tech Adept
 
Ricky/C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 178
Send a message via MSN to Ricky/C
Default

That's true!

How would we use spacers? You'd need 4 spacers instead of 2 for the F/R block...
__________________
TRF 416 WE | LRP SPX Stock Spec| 17.5 SP | Sanwa M11
TRF 416 WE | LRP TC Sphere | Novak 3.5 | Sanwa M11

www.oneten.co.za >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Home of RC in SA
Ricky/C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 11:13 AM   #5973
Tech Prophet
 
Randy Caster's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 16,671
Trader Rating: 46 (100%+)
Default

By using those instead of the stock pivot blocks, you are taking away one of the only left to right side connecting links along the chassis. The WE upper deck takes away the left to right side link that ran along the back end of the car between the rear belt, and look at all the extra traction that gave the car.

If you switch to the individual blocks, there would be no solid left to right side links on the chassis except the pivot blocks at the very front and rear of the car, and the shock towers. This would allow the chassis to flex even more.

One tuning resource I find myself using all the time now is switching between the 416 and the 416WE upper decks. The standard 416 deck really helps the car rotate better, and the WE upper deck gives a good amount of rear traction. Definitely worth trying out, just as I will test with the new blocks to see if I can further tune the chassis flex around my driving style.
Randy Caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 12:18 PM   #5974
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,544
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to John St.Amant Send a message via MSN to John St.Amant Send a message via Yahoo to John St.Amant
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Caster View Post
By using those instead of the stock pivot blocks, you are taking away one of the only left to right side connecting links along the chassis. The WE upper deck takes away the left to right side link that ran along the back end of the car between the rear belt, and look at all the extra traction that gave the car.

If you switch to the individual blocks, there would be no solid left to right side links on the chassis except the pivot blocks at the very front and rear of the car, and the shock towers. This would allow the chassis to flex even more.

One tuning resource I find myself using all the time now is switching between the 416 and the 416WE upper decks. The standard 416 deck really helps the car rotate better, and the WE upper deck gives a good amount of rear traction. Definitely worth trying out, just as I will test with the new blocks to see if I can further tune the chassis flex around my driving style.


Yadda yadda yadda .... I'm not buying that .
Its for cutting production cost. Fewer parts to make. Makes the kit more cost effective.
The Chassis will not lose any structural rigidity. The box that makes the chassis so stiff (or not so stiff) is made of the chassis, the 2 bulkheads and the upper deck. The mounts are not a factor as they are only attached to the chassis on both occasions. The manner in which the arms are fastened to the chassis and the stress it may see do not effect the pivots. They in no way hinder or promote flex in any way. But it does however make more room for a bigger diff pulley. And perhaps now the belt has a bit more room, especially if you want to run a lot of spacers under the mount. Oh, and I bet you will be seeing 0.5mm and 1.0mm shims soon.
__________________
Pro-Line Racing , Boca Bearings , Competition Heat.
Team Durango DEX210, DEX410V3, DESC410R, DNX408
Futaba FAAST 2.4 4PkS, LRP, Tekin, Xcellorin
John St.Amant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:06 PM   #5975
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,920
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John St.Amant View Post
Yadda yadda yadda .... I'm not buying that .
Its for cutting production cost. Fewer parts to make. Makes the kit more cost effective.
The Chassis will not lose any structural rigidity. The box that makes the chassis so stiff (or not so stiff) is made of the chassis, the 2 bulkheads and the upper deck. The mounts are not a factor as they are only attached to the chassis on both occasions. The manner in which the arms are fastened to the chassis and the stress it may see do not effect the pivots. They in no way hinder or promote flex in any way. But it does however make more room for a bigger diff pulley. And perhaps now the belt has a bit more room, especially if you want to run a lot of spacers under the mount. Oh, and I bet you will be seeing 0.5mm and 1.0mm shims soon.
i have to agree totally

major car manufacturers have been doing the same for many years , i have ordered the seperate arm mounts as i want to try differant things as thay are released , i dont know if it will give the cassis more or less flex but if it works who cares ??

the TRF416 is a great chassis and it keeps making me smile when i drive it
sidecarphil1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:31 PM   #5976
Tech Elite
 
Johnny Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,404
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

John, I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. I make reference to the front option bar available for the Xray car, this item definately changes the front end feel of that car and I believe its the same theory.
Johnny Wishbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:36 PM   #5977
Tech Prophet
 
Randy Caster's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 16,671
Trader Rating: 46 (100%+)
Default

In a hobby where a .5mm adjustment can make a big difference I'm finding it hard to believe that it's so hard to see this as another tuning option.

Look at the latest pictures from the ETS of Victor Wilck's car. Notice there is no brace on the steering posts. This is yet another way to get more flex from the car. We have never used the screw on that brace to the upper deck, but using, or not using that brace will affect the feel of the car.

See the new mounts however you like, but for now, it just gives me 1 more adjustment to get the car that much closer to perfect
Randy Caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:39 PM   #5978
Tech Elite
 
seaball's Avatar
R/C Tech Charter Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,303
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Send a message via Yahoo to seaball
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Caster View Post
randy!
__________________
*** The Gate II - Home of Mike Wise ***
seaball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:40 PM   #5979
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,544
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to John St.Amant Send a message via MSN to John St.Amant Send a message via Yahoo to John St.Amant
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Wishbone View Post
John, I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. I make reference to the front option bar available for the Xray car, this item definately changes the front end feel of that car and I believe its the same theory.
Bar?
Isn't that for the top deck?
Thats totally different man...
the bridge that we are talking about does not attach to the bulkheads.
It sits firmly on the chassis and does not effect torsional flex. The flex we adjust is between the upper deck and the bulkheads and chassis. Not the lower suspension mounts.

I wish i could draw it our on a napkin for you but I'm almost computer illiterate.
__________________
Pro-Line Racing , Boca Bearings , Competition Heat.
Team Durango DEX210, DEX410V3, DESC410R, DNX408
Futaba FAAST 2.4 4PkS, LRP, Tekin, Xcellorin
John St.Amant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:43 PM   #5980
Tech Lord
 
syndr0me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 5280 Raceway
Posts: 13,125
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Caster View Post
In a hobby where a .5mm adjustment can make a big difference I'm finding it hard to believe that it's so hard to see this as another tuning option.

Look at the latest pictures from the ETS of Victor Wilck's car. Notice there is no brace on the steering posts. This is yet another way to get more flex from the car. We have never used the screw on that brace to the upper deck, but using, or not using that brace will affect the feel of the car.

See the new mounts however you like, but for now, it just gives me 1 more adjustment to get the car that much closer to perfect
Not to mention the way they're messing with the number of screws in the rear part of the top deck (the long one).

I have to agree with Randy, the difference between the two top decks is very noticeable on the track. On our high-grip carpet, the long one makes the rear end feel a little too stuck. Though I'm curious to see if I could run it with less rear toe or something and get the car to be free but not loose. I've been struggling to find that balance.
syndr0me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:47 PM   #5981
Tech Prophet
 
Randy Caster's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 16,671
Trader Rating: 46 (100%+)
Default

Just to be sure that my posts aren't just speculation as to how the car will react with the new pivot blocks, I just ordered part #'s 54171 through 54175 so that I can test all of the new parts firsthand and give actual feedback from the track. Not sure if I'll have them by Thurs, but if I do, I'll be at the track all day and will be able to give feedback that night.
Randy Caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:49 PM   #5982
Tech Elite
 
Johnny Wishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,404
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John St.Amant View Post
Bar?
Isn't that for the top deck?
Thats totally different man...
the bridge that we are talking about does not attach to the bulkheads.
It sits firmly on the chassis and does not effect torsional flex. The flex we adjust is between the upper deck and the bulkheads and chassis. Not the lower suspension mounts.

I wish i could draw it our on a napkin for you but I'm almost computer illiterate.
No, lol. Xray Chassiss Brace #302054, a often overlooked tuning option for the rubber car.
Johnny Wishbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:50 PM   #5983
Tech Lord
 
Hebiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 12,919
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Caster View Post
Just to be sure that my posts aren't just speculation as to how the car will react with the new pivot blocks, I just ordered part #'s 54171 through 54175 so that I can test all of the new parts firsthand and give actual feedback from the track. Not sure if I'll have them by Thurs, but if I do, I'll be at the track all day and will be able to give feedback that night.
sent you a PM.

how you liking west coast RC? great to have an indoor track to test and practice on.
__________________
Hebiki Design Works
Custom R/C Vinyl Graphics & Apparel: Your gear, your way!
Web Design - Web Development - Logo Design - Graphic Design
www.facebook.com/HebikiDesignWorks
Hebiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 01:54 PM   #5984
Tech Prophet
 
Randy Caster's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 16,671
Trader Rating: 46 (100%+)
Default

I'll get your PM in a min Chris.

BTW, I was at a parking lot race this weekend, had a lot of fun and the car was really good. For anyone interested in the setup I used check out my latest blog on teamtrf.com

A video of the main: http://gallery.me.com/iigq4u#100510 (kinda disapointed in the low mod turnout that came to this race, a lot more promised to show but didn't.)

I'll try to get on the forums more often, just finished moving and working on multiple projects as well as work, and a lot of time at the track lately, I've been busy!
Randy Caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2009, 02:22 PM   #5985
Tech Champion
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 5,270
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Caster View Post
Just to be sure that my posts aren't just speculation as to how the car will react with the new pivot blocks, I just ordered part #'s 54171 through 54175 so that I can test all of the new parts firsthand and give actual feedback from the track. Not sure if I'll have them by Thurs, but if I do, I'll be at the track all day and will be able to give feedback that night.
Done the same myself... can but buy and try
__________________
| THard.co.uk | Xray | MuchMore |
TryHard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TRF416 sim600 Malaysian R/C Racers 15 01-09-2010 11:08 AM
TRF416 speedart Electric On-Road 26 06-27-2007 04:28 AM
new joke cyber3d Chat Lounge 5 08-02-2006 02:52 PM
another joke, OH no! corvettecrazy Chat Lounge 0 01-10-2004 09:11 AM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 01:03 PM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net