R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road

Like Tree3Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-06-2009, 05:58 AM   #3886
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 177
Default

I did a quick measurement of the stiffness of a brand new 416 and the 416WE main chassis when assembling my new car. The WE chassis was 10-20 % softer.
My experiance of the 416 when testing diffrent stiffness upper chassis has mostly been that softer is better for me.
moonman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 11:51 PM   #3887
Tech Addict
 
Adam?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ohhh, that guy...
Posts: 639
Default

On carpet with rubber tires (13.5) the car didn't feel nearly as direct with the new top deck. I suppose that's to be expected, as it seems to be meant for asphalt, but I figured it was worth a try. I'll keep it in the box for bad traction days.
Adam? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2009, 11:15 PM   #3888
Tech Champion
 
CraigM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,009
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Heres some idle chatter that may be of use to people...


I bent one of my C blocks the other day and took it as an opportunity to try some different suspension blocks up front. First I tried C/B, so a fraction narrower but .5 deg of sweep. This gave a bit too much steering off power but not enough on. Then I tried D/D again, which I had tried before but not with the HPI springs. This combo worked great, compared to C/C the steering is less direct but this made corner entry smoother and for me its easier to drive consistently
__________________
www.facebook.com/mcpheerc
CraigM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 02:11 AM   #3889
mok
Tech Master
 
mok's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,075
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Send a message via MSN to mok Send a message via Skype™ to mok
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigM View Post
Heres some idle chatter that may be of use to people...


I bent one of my C blocks the other day and took it as an opportunity to try some different suspension blocks up front. First I tried C/B, so a fraction narrower but .5 deg of sweep. This gave a bit too much steering off power but not enough on. Then I tried D/D again, which I had tried before but not with the HPI springs. This combo worked great, compared to C/C the steering is less direct but this made corner entry smoother and for me its easier to drive consistently
what if you now went back to C/C and used a 0.5mm spacer on the wheels?
this would keep the D/D track width, but with the C/C roll centers....
curious to me anyways, as i am wrestling with these sorts of setup changes myself atm...
__________________
XRAY T3'2011 / TEKIN RS PRO / LRP X12 / HYPERION SWIFT G3 RACE PACKS / FUTABA S9551 / SPEKTRUM DX3R
www.epracer.com - www.precc.org.au - www.westcoastmodelrallyclub.asn.au - www.onroadrccarclubbunbury.org.au
mok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 04:26 AM   #3890
Tech Master
 
veecee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,436
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigM View Post
Heres some idle chatter that may be of use to people...


I bent one of my C blocks the other day and took it as an opportunity to try some different suspension blocks up front. First I tried C/B, so a fraction narrower but .5 deg of sweep. This gave a bit too much steering off power but not enough on. Then I tried D/D again, which I had tried before but not with the HPI springs. This combo worked great, compared to C/C the steering is less direct but this made corner entry smoother and for me its easier to drive consistently
Nice findings Craig. I smoked my motor on my 2nd run so didn't get to try much...
__________________
SMOKEM --- XPRESS --- MONTECH --- SRT
veecee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 09:23 AM   #3891
Tech Champion
 
TimPotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Boynton Beach Fl > Randoph NJ
Posts: 7,481
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to TimPotter
Default

Any have feedback on the belt question....

Thanks...
__________________
Clean Title & Escrow|p3|TRF|Tamiya|SerpentAmerica|FSEARA|Team Butter|RC 3|Munno |RCTECH #29|EAMotorsports|BMI|Novak|SpeedPassion|RadioPost
TimPotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 09:28 AM   #3892
Tech Champion
 
RC MARKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 6,166
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimPotter View Post
Any have feedback on the belt question....

Thanks...
old or new belts ?
RC MARKET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 03:08 PM   #3893
Tech Champion
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 5,270
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam? View Post
On carpet with rubber tires (13.5) the car didn't feel nearly as direct with the new top deck. I suppose that's to be expected, as it seems to be meant for asphalt, but I figured it was worth a try. I'll keep it in the box for bad traction days.
TBH, I've found the car to be better with the cut brace regardless... Even on very high grip carpet and rubbers. Pretty much everyone else I've spoken whoose either tried a cut brace or new top deck ahs said the same thing...
__________________
| THard.co.uk | Xray | MuchMore |
TryHard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 04:17 PM   #3894
Tech Elite
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,030
Trader Rating: 23 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TryHard View Post
TBH, I've found the car to be better with the cut brace regardless... Even on very high grip carpet and rubbers. Pretty much everyone else I've spoken whoose either tried a cut brace or new top deck ahs said the same thing...
Which brace are you referring to as the 'cut brace'?

Btw, great site!
MDawson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 06:49 PM   #3895
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,544
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to John St.Amant Send a message via MSN to John St.Amant Send a message via Yahoo to John St.Amant
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarKing View Post
I was looking for a little input from Ed or anyone familar with this kit if people are using 2 or 3 hole pistons on outdoor asphalt.
2
John St.Amant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 06:59 PM   #3896
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 929
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

if i was to space my wheels out 1mm what will that do to my handling characteristics?
eddie10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 07:17 PM   #3897
Tech Champion
 
CraigM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,009
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

ah multiquote is back

Quote:
Originally Posted by mok View Post
what if you now went back to C/C and used a 0.5mm spacer on the wheels?
this would keep the D/D track width, but with the C/C roll centers....
curious to me anyways, as i am wrestling with these sorts of setup changes myself atm...
and you would have more camber rise compared to D/D due to the shorter links. hrmm

Quote:
Originally Posted by veecee View Post
Nice findings Craig. I smoked my motor on my 2nd run so didn't get to try much...
I heard about that, I almost did the same earlier - the faster track really builds the temps!
Quote:
Originally Posted by John St.Amant View Post
2
Most asphalt set ups I've seen use 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie10 View Post
if i was to space my wheels out 1mm what will that do to my handling characteristics?
According to the setup books, wider track gives less traction. I think the idea behind spacing though is to give you a particular width regardless of what blocks you're using. So you might use D/D with no spacers, or C/C with .5, or B/B with 1 and have the same front track. By doing this you are changing RC and camber rise without altering the track, so the traction gained or lost is all RC and not track width related

Personally, I space my rear wheels by .5mm when using D/D because I've been told not to run a wider front track than rear, and the rear is narrower than the front when using D/D XA/E without rear wheel spacers. I've never tried having a narrower rear, but people on here have and make it work.

As John has mentioned previously, you may be flirting with danger running 1mm of spacers in a wheel with a shallow hex. I've never had issues with .5 and rubbers on asphalt, but foam on carpet would be another story

</megapost>
__________________
www.facebook.com/mcpheerc
CraigM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 10:23 PM   #3898
Tech Master
 
maxepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Aliso Viejo, Calif.
Posts: 1,633
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawson View Post
Which brace are you referring to as the 'cut brace'?

Btw, great site!
Hey Mark,
What's up? I thought you were running Kyosho! Welcome back to the "DARK SIDE". Or is it the Dark blue side. Yes, TRYHARD'S website is excellent for info on the 416 and the 415.
maxepower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 10:24 PM   #3899
Tech Addict
 
Superkarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scarborough Australia
Posts: 630
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigM
Personally, I space my rear wheels by .5mm when using D/D because I've been told not to run a wider front track than rear, and the rear is narrower than the front when using D/D XA/E without rear wheel spacers. I've never tried having a narrower rear, but people on here have and make it work.
Hi Craig

I've been told and have tried it myself that a narrower rear track than the front will make the car want to understeer and vice-versa.

Tim
Superkarter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 10:58 PM   #3900
mok
Tech Master
 
mok's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,075
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Send a message via MSN to mok Send a message via Skype™ to mok
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigM View Post
As John has mentioned previously, you may be flirting with danger running 1mm of spacers in a wheel with a shallow hex. I've never had issues with .5 and rubbers on asphalt, but foam on carpet would be another story
my experiences have been that 0.5-1.5 is safe, but 2mm of spacers I would not..
(this has all been with rubbers on either carpet or asphalt)

i have been using speedmind, vtec, much more, tamiya and sorex rims with anywhere up to 1.5mm of spacers and never had a wheel come off..
i've got a tendency to believe that as long as about 1mm of wheel hub goes inside the rim then you should be ok (freak occurances aside )

i think realistically though, if you want 1mm or more of spacers then you should be moving to the 6mm hubs

-Mark
__________________
XRAY T3'2011 / TEKIN RS PRO / LRP X12 / HYPERION SWIFT G3 RACE PACKS / FUTABA S9551 / SPEKTRUM DX3R
www.epracer.com - www.precc.org.au - www.westcoastmodelrallyclub.asn.au - www.onroadrccarclubbunbury.org.au
mok is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TRF416 sim600 Malaysian R/C Racers 15 01-09-2010 11:08 AM
TRF416 speedart Electric On-Road 26 06-27-2007 04:28 AM
new joke cyber3d Chat Lounge 5 08-02-2006 02:52 PM
another joke, OH no! corvettecrazy Chat Lounge 0 01-10-2004 09:11 AM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 08:45 PM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net