Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya TRF416 / TRF416WE / TRF416X >

Tamiya TRF416 / TRF416WE / TRF416X

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree4Likes

Tamiya TRF416 / TRF416WE / TRF416X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2008, 04:25 AM
  #2086  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,386
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

sounds like a bent suspension block or hinge pin. Take the blocks off the car, and line them up against a straight edge. Do the same with the hinge pins.
Should be able to spot if they are bent quite easily.

Do that and then get back to us

HiH
Ed
TryHard is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 04:30 AM
  #2087  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,386
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by pug 205 gti
MR ED im wanting a new lipo or two as i only have the orion 3200.I see your running 3600.s now, but you recommend trying the smc 4000.any others youve seen that are up to scratch? i aint seen any uk smc dealers and ordering from the states sucks as i always get slapped off customs..... but hk is good.
cheerz
I believe the top packs out there are... (in no particular order).

Core 5000,
Orion 3600,
SMC 4000 & 5000

Pick one of thoose three and you'll be fine

HiH
Ed
TryHard is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 04:59 AM
  #2088  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
CraigM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,009
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by TryHard
I believe the top packs out there are... (in no particular order).

Core 5000,
Orion 3600,
SMC 4000 & 5000

Pick one of thoose three and you'll be fine

HiH
Ed
Does the SMC 5000 fit without modification?
CraigM is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 05:11 AM
  #2089  
Tech Regular
 
pug 205 gti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: england uk
Posts: 362
Default

Regarding the lipos.I understand the capacity rating and the 2 cell business.
What gets me is the 20c.25c.28c?? Im not understanding this?
Ive read that the higher the number the better punch is this correct?
But demon claim that it doesnt mean a thing when running 19t?
So guys out there that run 19t what do you think?
I know this is the 416 thread.but 415 now the 416 thread has always been the best for sensible informative knowledge.
O a good note my funds have increased of late so i maybe be joining the 416 brigade
Thing is though now i have some money i dont know where there is one?please pm me with a link if you are in the know
Thanks
pug 205 gti is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 05:12 AM
  #2090  
Tech Regular
 
pug 205 gti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: england uk
Posts: 362
Default

Originally Posted by CraigM
Does the SMC 5000 fit without modification?
Good question
pug 205 gti is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 05:34 AM
  #2091  
Tech Apprentice
 
sakaguchinet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gruendau, Germany
Posts: 95
Default

Hi,

Tamiya has just announced on its japanese news site new blue titanium turnbuckles. Also a new wrench will be available soon.
sakaguchinet is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 06:03 AM
  #2092  
HPZ
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 98
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Ed: just checked my hinge pins and and the suspension blocks, they are all as straight as can be. Also there is no play or binding in my arms and pins as i shim them out with the 3mm shims.

so far i can't seem to find the culprit for this weird left to right balance
HPZ is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 06:09 AM
  #2093  
Tech Master
iTrader: (34)
 
veecee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,454
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by CraigM
Does the SMC 5000 fit without modification?
Looks like it does - http://rctech.net/forum/showpost.php...postcount=1758

Just curious... When it is that close to the upper deck, will it affect handling because it impedes the chassis from flexing properly?

Last edited by veecee; 05-05-2008 at 03:38 PM.
veecee is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 06:22 AM
  #2094  
Tech Addict
 
Eirik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 627
Default

Originally Posted by HPZ
Ed: just checked my hinge pins and and the suspension blocks, they are all as straight as can be. Also there is no play or binding in my arms and pins as i shim them out with the 3mm shims.

so far i can't seem to find the culprit for this weird left to right balance
Try a new set of tires or swap them arround.
Sometimes the belting in one tire loosens and the car will be terrible!
Eirik is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 06:33 AM
  #2095  
HPZ
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 98
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

i was testing with a new set of tires and a new body as well

my reasoning is that the heavy brushless motor is putting left rear biased weight and the batteries aren't heavy enough around the rear right of the car hence my test with the 4cells and heavily lead loaded right side worked out fine , but isn't pratical.

doesn't anyone else seem that the heavy brushless motors are putting too much rear bias on the car ?

any help appreciated
HPZ
HPZ is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 07:17 AM
  #2096  
Tech Regular
 
pug 205 gti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: england uk
Posts: 362
Default

From what ive understood the TRF416 was designed to have more weight over the rear wheels to help get all the brushless power hooked up.
I bet that like MR ED said, "that something is Eltonjohn"
check shock lengths with and with out springs.mayalso be a leaky shock or have air bubbles in.
pug 205 gti is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 09:21 AM
  #2097  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
 
syndr0me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 5280 Raceway
Posts: 13,279
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

I was breaking arms like crazy on my car yesterday, so I went back to the soft c-hubs (from the TA05-IFS) that I'd been using before. Same mould as the stock ones, but a much softer material. Not only did the breakage stop, but I gained a TON of steering (treated asphalt) and found the car to behave much better than before. I know soft suspension components are a faux pas, but the car worked SO much better with them, I'm not sure what to think now.
syndr0me is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 09:23 AM
  #2098  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
 
syndr0me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 5280 Raceway
Posts: 13,279
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Also, is the spool not intended to be used in the high position? The sleeves rubbed on the bulk heads, heated up, and melted the outdrives. I had the dots on the carriers pointing down, which I believe moves the spool high. This doesn't seem like an option without some modification to the top part of the bulkhead.
syndr0me is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 11:41 AM
  #2099  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,386
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by HPZ
i was testing with a new set of tires and a new body as well

my reasoning is that the heavy brushless motor is putting left rear biased weight and the batteries aren't heavy enough around the rear right of the car hence my test with the 4cells and heavily lead loaded right side worked out fine , but isn't pratical.

doesn't anyone else seem that the heavy brushless motors are putting too much rear bias on the car ?

any help appreciated
HPZ
Have you checked your tweak settings?
Personally, I'll set the car up so the tweak is correct side to side (I use an MIP tweak station for this, as personally, I feel it's the most accurate method), rather than ensuring ride height is correct side to side.

What i do is first off, take the wheels and tires off the car and remove the shocks from the arms. Then I'll set my droop up using a gauge underneath the chassis, measuring to the same point (under the outer hinge pins) on the arms.
Following that, I'll place the car on a flat surface (a setup board usually), and loosen the top deck screws. Pushing down lightly on the shock towers, I'll re tighten the top deck screws, to ensure that the chassis is flat.

Now, I'll re-mount the shocks, wheels and tyres, and have the shocks set too an equal number of turns of the collars (having previously built them all up equal in terms of length). Then I'll place the car on the tweak station, and see how the tweak is set (make sure you have all your electrics in at this point, including batteries), then adjust the shock collars accordingly until the tweak is correct. Usually, 1-1&1/2 turns is the maximum the shocks should be different. More than 2, and I'd go back and make sure the car is built straight.

Then set you ride height at the front of the car, by making equal adjustments to the left and right shocks. Do the same at the rear for the rear ride height. This way, you'll keep your tweak setting correct, whilst getting the ride height close enough. Like I said before having the tweak correct is, IMO, far more important to a good handling car than having the ride hieght correct.

HiH
Ed
TryHard is offline  
Old 05-05-2008, 12:21 PM
  #2100  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (100)
 
Kwikvdub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 6,034
Trader Rating: 100 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by andyuk99
Not for me, but does anybody know the part number for the parts to mount a Tamyia stick pack in the 416 ??

Many thanks
Try here:
http://rcmarket.com.hk/product_info....oducts_id=2717

Great place to order Tamiya stuff!
Kwikvdub is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.