Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya F103 Forum >

Tamiya F103 Forum

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree9Likes

Tamiya F103 Forum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2010, 09:00 PM
  #1291  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
RedBullFiXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Intergalactic Planetary
Posts: 6,542
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

To be honest, I'm just glad people are racing DD F1's again.
It was looking pretty grim there for a while, they even tried to turn F1 into an open wheel TC

So right now, in the BIG picture, it's good times
RedBullFiXX is offline  
Old 06-12-2010, 05:37 AM
  #1292  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calif.
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by RedBullFiXX
To be honest, I'm just glad people are racing DD F1's again.
It was looking pretty grim there for a while, they even tried to turn F1 into an open wheel TC

So right now, in the BIG picture, it's good times
I agree, and I had about the same luck with the F-201 as i do with TC I love our F-103 class at our track.
TheOtherBill is offline  
Old 06-12-2010, 07:30 AM
  #1293  
Tech Elite
 
Foxxrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 2,018
Default

We've been running the J540s in our cars. It's kept the class more based on skill and setup, and less on electronics.
Foxxrocket is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 12:03 AM
  #1294  
Tech Regular
 
kneedeeppow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: new zealand
Posts: 307
Default

does anyone know if the chevron models bodies will fit a 103? i want a more rounded modern looking body like the 104 f60. most of the 103 bodys i have seen are quite square looking.cheers
kneedeeppow is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 02:05 AM
  #1295  
Tech Regular
 
Manny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 421
Default f1-08

It depends on whether you add the optional undercut side pods. If you do then the body really doesn't fit with a std size stick pack in an f103. If you stick with the normal side pods that have no undercuts, then you should be ok. Unfortunately it's more square...
Manny is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 02:32 AM
  #1296  
Tech Regular
 
kneedeeppow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: new zealand
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by Manny
It depends on whether you add the optional undercut side pods. If you do then the body really doesn't fit with a std size stick pack in an f103. If you stick with the normal side pods that have no undercuts, then you should be ok. Unfortunately it's more square...
i am hoping to get my lipos to fit somehow. might have to mod the battery mounts to do so. what do the undercut sidepods look like? anything like whats in the attached pic
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya F103 Forum-chev-fsl025w-01_01.jpg  
kneedeeppow is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 03:16 AM
  #1297  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

Which of the Chevron bodies is that?
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 03:19 AM
  #1298  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

I've been toying around with an idea I wonder if anyone has tried yet. I'm thinking on running the t-plate of the 103 like the HB 1/12th which is a pivot in the rear and bolted solid in the front instead of using tweak screws. I figure I could use half of the old battery/suspension mount on the front part of the t-plate with a spacer and use the newer pivot stile battery/suspension mount on the back of the t-plate. Since I'm running LiPo I'm not using the battery cups on the side so I don't need to worry about those not lining up properly.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 04:13 AM
  #1299  
Tech Regular
 
Manny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by kneedeeppow
i am hoping to get my lipos to fit somehow. might have to mod the battery mounts to do so. what do the undercut sidepods look like? anything like whats in the attached pic
I believe that is the f1-08 (stock #fsl025k). I would post a pic of mine but it isn't painted yet.
Manny is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 05:16 AM
  #1300  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (12)
 
RC MARKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 6,279
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

TRG F103 Conv. kit

http://rcmarket.com.hk/index.php?cPa...sort=2a&page=8
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya F103 Forum-tr-5025-l.jpg   Tamiya F103 Forum-trg-5024b.jpg  
RC MARKET is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 07:19 AM
  #1301  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by kneedeeppow
i am hoping to get my lipos to fit somehow ...
yeah racing has a battery mount that is slimmer and will fit a Lipo.

Tamiya F103 Forum-20100326-f103-01-rctech.jpg

but if you wish to spend a bit more ... then there is the new TRG109 ... tasty

Tamiya F103 Forum-20100507-trg109.jpg
chinaman is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 08:11 AM
  #1302  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bakaguyjean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atsugi Japan
Posts: 823
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt
I've been toying around with an idea I wonder if anyone has tried yet. I'm thinking on running the t-plate of the 103 like the HB 1/12th which is a pivot in the rear and bolted solid in the front instead of using tweak screws. I figure I could use half of the old battery/suspension mount on the front part of the t-plate with a spacer and use the newer pivot stile battery/suspension mount on the back of the t-plate. Since I'm running LiPo I'm not using the battery cups on the side so I don't need to worry about those not lining up properly.
This inst a bad idea,but the basic problem with the pivot ball on the F103 is the "T" bar swings and doesnt pivot like any 1/12th car does. 1/12th scale cars that use pivot balls have them mounted in the "T" bar. The F103 has the "T" bar lower than the ball,causeing the swing.
Give it a shot as it sounds like you have all of the parts allready,takes about 5 minutes,but dont expect much.
bakaguyjean is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 08:21 AM
  #1303  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bakaguyjean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atsugi Japan
Posts: 823
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by kneedeeppow
i am hoping to get my lipos to fit somehow. might have to mod the battery mounts to do so. what do the undercut sidepods look like? anything like whats in the attached pic
This body has undercut sides,what type lipo are you using? If it has pre-attached wires on the end and you are using the battery holders on the end, it will be a tight fit. If you have lipos that has Euro plugs out the top then its much easier to fit this Chevron body.You cant have wires a mile long off your battery but thats most F1 bodies anyway. The newer body that Chevron makes,the Red Bull type doesn`t have undercut side pods,but look a little wide/square compared to the one you posted a picture of.
bakaguyjean is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 08:36 AM
  #1304  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (32)
 
j.d.roost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,257
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by chinaman
yeah racing has a battery mount that is slimmer and will fit a Lipo.

Attachment 604090

but if you wish to spend a bit more ... then there is the new TRG109 ... tasty

Attachment 604093
That TRG car is nice..BUT it's just the sort of car that could mess up the class. One of the rules with our local f1 crew is "f103/f104"style front end. That carbon stuff is pushing the rules in my book. Lets not turn these things into $$ pan cars again (remember the corally f1?).I think it's up to local racers to keep the class under control before people go out and spend on this sort of stuff.

This weekend we had two f109's a few 103's and few 104's. Racing was tight and it was a TON of fun. Finish was a 104 with 103 stock front end,103 and 109.
j.d.roost is offline  
Old 06-13-2010, 09:07 AM
  #1305  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bakaguyjean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atsugi Japan
Posts: 823
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by j.d.roost
That TRG car is nice..BUT it's just the sort of car that could mess up the class. One of the rules with our local f1 crew is "f103/f104"style front end. That carbon stuff is pushing the rules in my book. Lets not turn these things into $$ pan cars again (remember the corally f1?).I think it's up to local racers to keep the class under control before people go out and spend on this sort of stuff.

This weekend we had two f109's a few 103's and few 104's. Racing was tight and it was a TON of fun. Finish was a 104 with 103 stock front end,103 and 109.
I race with 5 guys that run the TRG chassis. Everybody that has one has ditched the front suspension,and use normal type suspension arms. They also removed the whole silly rear lever dampers,and now use a single damper tube mounted off the gearbox anchored to the chassis.
One of the guys by-passed the whole kit and bought the useable parts seperate for a third of the price. The TRG team drivers dont even use the complete chassis,just the main chassis,gearbox and a single damper tube.
bakaguyjean is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.