Low Profile Servos
#1
Low Profile Servos
What is shortest low profile servo available?
#2
Tech Master
The KO 2413 or the Futaba 9550. If you're looking at touring application...
#4
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (101)
yup, those are teh only ones avaible, the 9550 is liek $80 bucks! cant beat that, its kinda on the low torque and speed that i like, i usualy transfer my servo, rx, and qc2 to my offroad stuff, and i like the fastness for offroad, atleast .06-.08 where the 9550 is .10
#5
Tech Master
Originally Posted by BSchorr
yup, those are teh only ones avaible, the 9550 is liek $80 bucks! cant beat that, its kinda on the low torque and speed that i like, i usualy transfer my servo, rx, and qc2 to my offroad stuff, and i like the fastness for offroad, atleast .06-.08 where the 9550 is .10
#6
Ive had no issues with my s9550, its a nice piece of kit for the money
#8
I've been having an issue with a Futaba 9550 servo introducing interference and misc glitches. It really gets "nervous" when my transponder is mounted near it. Anyone else having this issue?
If I replace the 9550 with a KO-2343 servo (not the low profile one) I don't have any glitches or radio interference, however, the KO-2343 seems to draw more power and you can see the LED on the transponder really dim when turning the steering servo. This has resulted in missed laps. I'm curious if anyone else has had similar issues.
- Tom
If I replace the 9550 with a KO-2343 servo (not the low profile one) I don't have any glitches or radio interference, however, the KO-2343 seems to draw more power and you can see the LED on the transponder really dim when turning the steering servo. This has resulted in missed laps. I'm curious if anyone else has had similar issues.
- Tom
#9
Super Moderator
iTrader: (239)
Originally Posted by Chemical X
I've been having an issue with a Futaba 9550 servo introducing interference and misc glitches. It really gets "nervous" when my transponder is mounted near it. Anyone else having this issue?
If I replace the 9550 with a KO-2343 servo (not the low profile one) I don't have any glitches or radio interference, however, the KO-2343 seems to draw more power and you can see the LED on the transponder really dim when turning the steering servo. This has resulted in missed laps. I'm curious if anyone else has had similar issues.
- Tom
If I replace the 9550 with a KO-2343 servo (not the low profile one) I don't have any glitches or radio interference, however, the KO-2343 seems to draw more power and you can see the LED on the transponder really dim when turning the steering servo. This has resulted in missed laps. I'm curious if anyone else has had similar issues.
- Tom
#10
Tech Champion
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: In a land of mini-mighty mental giants
Posts: 8,854
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Originally Posted by Chemical X
I've been having an issue with a Futaba 9550 servo introducing interference and misc glitches. It really gets "nervous" when my transponder is mounted near it. Anyone else having this issue?
- Tom
- Tom
#11
Tech Addict
iTrader: (6)
When I had my transponder mounted on the servo it messed up the steering when driving in certain spots on the track. Maybe a certain mixture of different signals just enough to make it wonky..
Granted, it was right beside the receiver too, but I had to place it as far away as possible to the front of the car. No problems since.
When I had my Quantum 2 I had to put a cap into the receiver to keep it from losing laps and glitching when accelerating, and it was just a regular analog plastic-geared servo! I had since dumped it for a GTX and a Keyence, no issues with either. I do keep a capacitor in the receiver for my 1/12th scale though..
KO servos (esp. digital) really take a lot more current than others, you'll want a cap for those too.
Granted, it was right beside the receiver too, but I had to place it as far away as possible to the front of the car. No problems since.
When I had my Quantum 2 I had to put a cap into the receiver to keep it from losing laps and glitching when accelerating, and it was just a regular analog plastic-geared servo! I had since dumped it for a GTX and a Keyence, no issues with either. I do keep a capacitor in the receiver for my 1/12th scale though..
KO servos (esp. digital) really take a lot more current than others, you'll want a cap for those too.
#12
Thanks for the feedback.
I am using a Quantum 2 esc and was thinking about adding in a capacitor to see if that would help on the servo's power draw. What capacitor are you using? The one from the QC2 Worlds Kit?
I am using a Quantum 2 esc and was thinking about adding in a capacitor to see if that would help on the servo's power draw. What capacitor are you using? The one from the QC2 Worlds Kit?
#13
I have used both the Futaba and KO low profile servo's. Actuall performance difference is none that you would notice. The only reason I changed to the KO is that I read that whilst running a QC2 and Spektrum there was glitch problems especially on rubber tyres on carpet. I used to get a glitch maybe every 10 races which in the end wound me up.
I was so upset that I also bought the twister 2.1 and installed both. Appx 100 races later I have had no glitches and gone faster
I was so upset that I also bought the twister 2.1 and installed both. Appx 100 races later I have had no glitches and gone faster
#14
Tech Adept
Does someone know if the different type of servos has an influence on the electric energy they use.
For example is the current draw of an KO 2413(low profile) lower then the current draw of the KO 2343 servo(digital fet).
Arjen
For example is the current draw of an KO 2413(low profile) lower then the current draw of the KO 2343 servo(digital fet).
Arjen