Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Yokomo MR-4TC SD >

Yokomo MR-4TC SD

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree12Likes

Yokomo MR-4TC SD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2004, 07:40 PM
  #9061  
Registered User
 
ritchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,044
Default

Originally posted by ritchie
question: what exactly are the little foam do da's in the shock cap under the shock bladder suppose to do?
anyone?
ritchie is offline  
Old 07-27-2004, 09:13 PM
  #9062  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 110
Default

isn't that what make the shock bounce back when you compress it?
dragoneuh is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 12:20 AM
  #9063  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
Lonestar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,039
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default blue foams

yup that's what they're for...

I personnally don't use them, I think they add nothing to your shocks. I like as little rebound as possible (there's always some due to the CV bladder) when I build them. Might as well use different springs if your want faster rebounding shocks...


Later
Paul
Lonestar is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 12:52 AM
  #9064  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (6)
 
Matt Howard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 5,954
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally posted by GeorgePravata
Hey i heard you got to leave. my god daughter is going back to iraq She was there for 12 months and came back and now she is going back and will have to stay till 2007 maybe...
My flight leaves tuesday for Korea, I'll be there for a year.
Matt Howard is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 01:01 AM
  #9065  
Tech Master
 
johnbull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Malta. G.C.
Posts: 1,762
Default

Hi friends. Greetings from Malta.

MATT. Steady on. Perhaps its because you are travelling to the far East and will be closer to Masami physically too !

SHOCKS. I have just built up a set without the rubber sponges and I must say they feel alot nicer.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SSG and CGM. I think the basic difference is in the chassis flex. The SSG chassis has plenty of flex. If you remove the central backbone it gives it even more flex. That can be good in some cases. A car that flexes is alot easier for a beginner to drive because it is more forgiving. This can also be used to advantage by experts.

The downside however is tweek. The SSG chassis tends to tweek more easily and this can be a nuisance, especially if you clout a banking early in a race and tweek the chassis. De Tweeking is very simple. Just loosen the top plate screws a bit, wiggle the chassis, and retighten the screws. But it's not something you can do half way through a race.

The CGM chassis on the other hand is extremely rigid - dare I say the most rigid chassis in existance ! The good thing here is that once set up, the car is always right. It just doesn't tweek.

I made my own flat chassis out of 3.8mm carbon fibre. It's similar to the Rayspeed chassis but much stiffer. The only reason I made it was because the CGM had not been born yet and I wanted a stiff chassis. If it ever breaks I will have no second thoughts about simply replacing it with a CGM chassis - probably the normal one, not the lightweight.

I see that CGMs finished off 1st and 2nd in the British Nats last weekend at Halifax.
johnbull is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 01:07 AM
  #9066  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
Lonestar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,039
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally posted by johnbull
Hi friends. Greetings from Malta.

I see that CGMs finished off 1st and 2nd in the British Nats last weekend at Halifax.
Cool! SD's finally winning something after Masami's national title last year! At least! Joe, would you have a link so that we can see winning car pics? Thanks! Btw thanks for the CGM comments

Tweak on the SSG car: quick fix that also makes the car way more rigid: use countersunk screws on the upper plate (after removing the central one) without countersinking the plate itself... et voila, you can bang it against the board as hard as often as you like, and it doesn't tweak any more!

Will run the car this afternoon after a 3 wks break... I won't break the track record today....

later
Paul
Lonestar is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 04:17 AM
  #9067  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hinckley, England
Posts: 448
Default

i dont no wheter to get rayspeed or cgm conversion kit? i race on tarmac and on carpet but i would preferably like the one that is best on tarmac and okay on carpet. any ideas?

also on a scale of 1 to 10 where does the rayspeed come for stiffness:
1 being ssg and 10 being cgm



many thanks
A Gower
agower is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:29 AM
  #9068  
Tech Master
 
johnbull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Malta. G.C.
Posts: 1,762
Default

Originally posted by agower
i dont no wheter to get rayspeed or cgm conversion kit? i race on tarmac and on carpet but i would preferably like the one that is best on tarmac and okay on carpet. any ideas?

also on a scale of 1 to 10 where does the rayspeed come for stiffness:
1 being ssg and 10 being cgm



many thanks
A Gower
I would say about 4. My chassis is probably 8, but the CGM chassis is a good 10.

PAUL. You can read the Racer report. Go to Team Orion website and follow the prompts from there.

Interestingly there were 4 CGMs in the A final.
johnbull is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:37 AM
  #9069  
Tech Elite
 
Horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 3,970
Default

My guesstimations:

SSG - 1
RS Chassis - 6
RS Chassis with doubled top deck - 8
John Bull chassis (made out of ex 1:1 race car) - 9
CGM - 10

1 being flexible

10 being rigid

Style points:

SSG - 9 (just because it's silver!!)

RS - 9 (that WCF looks awesome)

Custom hand-made chassis - 9.5 (so long as it's WCF)

CGM - 5 (no comment!)
Horatio is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:46 AM
  #9070  
Tech Elite
 
Horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 3,970
Default

Johnbull:

Doh!!! Our posts crossed in the ether!

No contradictions intended, but we weren't that far off were we?!
Horatio is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 02:02 PM
  #9071  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hinckley, England
Posts: 448
Default

Originally posted by Horatio
My guesstimations:

SSG - 1
RS Chassis - 6
RS Chassis with doubled top deck - 8
John Bull chassis (made out of ex 1:1 race car) - 9
CGM - 10

1 being flexible

10 being rigid

Style points:

SSG - 9 (just because it's silver!!)

RS - 9 (that WCF looks awesome)

Custom hand-made chassis - 9.5 (so long as it's WCF)

CGM - 5 (no comment!)


double topdeck?
agower is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:46 PM
  #9072  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (6)
 
Matt Howard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 5,954
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally posted by agower
double topdeck?
You can use two topdecks sandwiched together to make a stiffer car.
Matt Howard is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:54 PM
  #9073  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
Blakesrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Montgomery, TX
Posts: 994
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

Matt,

I dont know if anyone ever answered your question about the chassis Billy E. is using. I was down at Socal last night and he was running the ssg, just fyi.

Blake
Blakesrc is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 07:06 PM
  #9074  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (6)
 
Matt Howard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 5,954
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally posted by Blakesrc
Matt,

I dont know if anyone ever answered your question about the chassis Billy E. is using. I was down at Socal last night and he was running the ssg, just fyi.

Blake
Thanks. So is everyone gonna break out their old SSG chassis'?
Matt Howard is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 08:53 PM
  #9075  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (32)
 
STLNLST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 9,939
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally posted by Matt Howard
Thanks. So is everyone gonna break out their old SSG chassis'?
Matt- My win this weekend won't be complete without you in the race...
STLNLST is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.