Yokomo MR-4TC SD
#9061
Originally posted by ritchie
question: what exactly are the little foam do da's in the shock cap under the shock bladder suppose to do?
question: what exactly are the little foam do da's in the shock cap under the shock bladder suppose to do?
#9062
Tech Adept
isn't that what make the shock bounce back when you compress it?
#9063
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
blue foams
yup that's what they're for...
I personnally don't use them, I think they add nothing to your shocks. I like as little rebound as possible (there's always some due to the CV bladder) when I build them. Might as well use different springs if your want faster rebounding shocks...
Later
Paul
I personnally don't use them, I think they add nothing to your shocks. I like as little rebound as possible (there's always some due to the CV bladder) when I build them. Might as well use different springs if your want faster rebounding shocks...
Later
Paul
#9064
Tech Champion
iTrader: (6)
Originally posted by GeorgePravata
Hey i heard you got to leave. my god daughter is going back to iraq She was there for 12 months and came back and now she is going back and will have to stay till 2007 maybe...
Hey i heard you got to leave. my god daughter is going back to iraq She was there for 12 months and came back and now she is going back and will have to stay till 2007 maybe...
#9065
Hi friends. Greetings from Malta.
MATT. Steady on. Perhaps its because you are travelling to the far East and will be closer to Masami physically too !
SHOCKS. I have just built up a set without the rubber sponges and I must say they feel alot nicer.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SSG and CGM. I think the basic difference is in the chassis flex. The SSG chassis has plenty of flex. If you remove the central backbone it gives it even more flex. That can be good in some cases. A car that flexes is alot easier for a beginner to drive because it is more forgiving. This can also be used to advantage by experts.
The downside however is tweek. The SSG chassis tends to tweek more easily and this can be a nuisance, especially if you clout a banking early in a race and tweek the chassis. De Tweeking is very simple. Just loosen the top plate screws a bit, wiggle the chassis, and retighten the screws. But it's not something you can do half way through a race.
The CGM chassis on the other hand is extremely rigid - dare I say the most rigid chassis in existance ! The good thing here is that once set up, the car is always right. It just doesn't tweek.
I made my own flat chassis out of 3.8mm carbon fibre. It's similar to the Rayspeed chassis but much stiffer. The only reason I made it was because the CGM had not been born yet and I wanted a stiff chassis. If it ever breaks I will have no second thoughts about simply replacing it with a CGM chassis - probably the normal one, not the lightweight.
I see that CGMs finished off 1st and 2nd in the British Nats last weekend at Halifax.
MATT. Steady on. Perhaps its because you are travelling to the far East and will be closer to Masami physically too !
SHOCKS. I have just built up a set without the rubber sponges and I must say they feel alot nicer.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SSG and CGM. I think the basic difference is in the chassis flex. The SSG chassis has plenty of flex. If you remove the central backbone it gives it even more flex. That can be good in some cases. A car that flexes is alot easier for a beginner to drive because it is more forgiving. This can also be used to advantage by experts.
The downside however is tweek. The SSG chassis tends to tweek more easily and this can be a nuisance, especially if you clout a banking early in a race and tweek the chassis. De Tweeking is very simple. Just loosen the top plate screws a bit, wiggle the chassis, and retighten the screws. But it's not something you can do half way through a race.
The CGM chassis on the other hand is extremely rigid - dare I say the most rigid chassis in existance ! The good thing here is that once set up, the car is always right. It just doesn't tweek.
I made my own flat chassis out of 3.8mm carbon fibre. It's similar to the Rayspeed chassis but much stiffer. The only reason I made it was because the CGM had not been born yet and I wanted a stiff chassis. If it ever breaks I will have no second thoughts about simply replacing it with a CGM chassis - probably the normal one, not the lightweight.
I see that CGMs finished off 1st and 2nd in the British Nats last weekend at Halifax.
#9066
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
Originally posted by johnbull
Hi friends. Greetings from Malta.
I see that CGMs finished off 1st and 2nd in the British Nats last weekend at Halifax.
Hi friends. Greetings from Malta.
I see that CGMs finished off 1st and 2nd in the British Nats last weekend at Halifax.
Tweak on the SSG car: quick fix that also makes the car way more rigid: use countersunk screws on the upper plate (after removing the central one) without countersinking the plate itself... et voila, you can bang it against the board as hard as often as you like, and it doesn't tweak any more!
Will run the car this afternoon after a 3 wks break... I won't break the track record today....
later
Paul
#9067
Tech Regular
i dont no wheter to get rayspeed or cgm conversion kit? i race on tarmac and on carpet but i would preferably like the one that is best on tarmac and okay on carpet. any ideas?
also on a scale of 1 to 10 where does the rayspeed come for stiffness:
1 being ssg and 10 being cgm
many thanks
A Gower
also on a scale of 1 to 10 where does the rayspeed come for stiffness:
1 being ssg and 10 being cgm
many thanks
A Gower
#9068
Originally posted by agower
i dont no wheter to get rayspeed or cgm conversion kit? i race on tarmac and on carpet but i would preferably like the one that is best on tarmac and okay on carpet. any ideas?
also on a scale of 1 to 10 where does the rayspeed come for stiffness:
1 being ssg and 10 being cgm
many thanks
A Gower
i dont no wheter to get rayspeed or cgm conversion kit? i race on tarmac and on carpet but i would preferably like the one that is best on tarmac and okay on carpet. any ideas?
also on a scale of 1 to 10 where does the rayspeed come for stiffness:
1 being ssg and 10 being cgm
many thanks
A Gower
PAUL. You can read the Racer report. Go to Team Orion website and follow the prompts from there.
Interestingly there were 4 CGMs in the A final.
#9069
My guesstimations:
SSG - 1
RS Chassis - 6
RS Chassis with doubled top deck - 8
John Bull chassis (made out of ex 1:1 race car) - 9
CGM - 10
1 being flexible
10 being rigid
Style points:
SSG - 9 (just because it's silver!!)
RS - 9 (that WCF looks awesome)
Custom hand-made chassis - 9.5 (so long as it's WCF)
CGM - 5 (no comment!)
SSG - 1
RS Chassis - 6
RS Chassis with doubled top deck - 8
John Bull chassis (made out of ex 1:1 race car) - 9
CGM - 10
1 being flexible
10 being rigid
Style points:
SSG - 9 (just because it's silver!!)
RS - 9 (that WCF looks awesome)
Custom hand-made chassis - 9.5 (so long as it's WCF)
CGM - 5 (no comment!)
#9070
Johnbull:
Doh!!! Our posts crossed in the ether!
No contradictions intended, but we weren't that far off were we?!
Doh!!! Our posts crossed in the ether!
No contradictions intended, but we weren't that far off were we?!
#9071
Tech Regular
Originally posted by Horatio
My guesstimations:
SSG - 1
RS Chassis - 6
RS Chassis with doubled top deck - 8
John Bull chassis (made out of ex 1:1 race car) - 9
CGM - 10
1 being flexible
10 being rigid
Style points:
SSG - 9 (just because it's silver!!)
RS - 9 (that WCF looks awesome)
Custom hand-made chassis - 9.5 (so long as it's WCF)
CGM - 5 (no comment!)
My guesstimations:
SSG - 1
RS Chassis - 6
RS Chassis with doubled top deck - 8
John Bull chassis (made out of ex 1:1 race car) - 9
CGM - 10
1 being flexible
10 being rigid
Style points:
SSG - 9 (just because it's silver!!)
RS - 9 (that WCF looks awesome)
Custom hand-made chassis - 9.5 (so long as it's WCF)
CGM - 5 (no comment!)
double topdeck?