Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Corally RDX Phi >

Team Corally RDX Phi

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Team Corally RDX Phi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2009, 03:50 PM
  #3196  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
s.nicholson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 672
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by PizzaDude
OK I'll bite...

I don't know about the other cars you mentioned, but the TQ/winners car I can assure you had no proto parts whatsoever. All regular, over the counter/available parts.
I agree i always use to run the old car with full standard only addition was tamiya shocks. I tried the mods but i did not like it in modified and my car was super fast just standard.
s.nicholson is offline  
Old 06-08-2009, 12:33 AM
  #3197  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Hague, Holland
Posts: 205
Default

Originally Posted by s.nicholson
I agree i always use to run the old car with full standard only addition was tamiya shocks. I tried the mods but i did not like it in modified and my car was super fast just standard.
Same here, only things different from the box were the steering lever and the rear uprights, which both were commericially available, and different shocks.
Rick Thomson is offline  
Old 06-11-2009, 10:48 AM
  #3198  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
RaceBucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca.
Posts: 512
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default Short Wheelbase Configuration ...

I am wanting to set up my Phi with the short wheel base configuration but am having trouble understanding the rear belt implications. I’ve seen posts here before but the discussion seems to end before the solution gets posted.

I’m running the stock pulleys and rear hubs, just need to know what size belt and where to get it. I think the stock rear belt is 213mm (71 tooth), and the shorter wheel base is 8mm shorter, so I assume we need to take 16mm (15mm or 18mm since the teeth are 3mm apart) from the belt making it a 195mm (65 tooth) or 198mm (66 tooth) belt. Is this right?

I don’t see a belt near this size listed on the Corally site, is there one, or where are people getting these?

Thanks.
RaceBucks is offline  
Old 06-11-2009, 10:57 AM
  #3199  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Hague, Holland
Posts: 205
Default

Originally Posted by RaceBucks
I am wanting to set up my Phi with the short wheel base configuration but am having trouble understanding the rear belt implications. I’ve seen posts here before but the discussion seems to end before the solution gets posted.

I’m running the stock pulleys and rear hubs, just need to know what size belt and where to get it. I think the stock rear belt is 213mm (71 tooth), and the shorter wheel base is 8mm shorter, so I assume we need to take 16mm (15mm or 18mm since the teeth are 3mm apart) from the belt making it a 195mm (65 tooth) or 198mm (66 tooth) belt. Is this right?

I don’t see a belt near this size listed on the Corally site, is there one, or where are people getting these?

Thanks.
I've been testing this myself, and had to use belts of another brand the get the car alright. But when I tested it the car was almost uncontrolable, so as an advise, save some time and money, stick to the original wheelbase, that just works best for this car.
Rick Thomson is offline  
Old 06-11-2009, 01:41 PM
  #3200  
Tech Regular
 
Holmenkollen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 460
Default

Originally Posted by Rick Thomson
I've been testing this myself, and had to use belts of another brand the get the car alright. But when I tested it the car was almost uncontrolable, so as an advise, save some time and money, stick to the original wheelbase, that just works best for this car.
I´m not a team driver but have tested std vs. short wheelbase and dampers behind the tower back to back. Both indoors on carpet and outdoors on tarmac the shorter wheelbase setup is ap. 2/10 faster. The car rotates much faster without feeling lose and it has more steering. The std PHI have a very long wheelbase compared to other cars; actually the "super-short" wheelbase is very close to what Tamiya, Xray and others have from the box. Best to say that I´m driving modified rubber.
Holmenkollen is offline  
Old 06-11-2009, 02:54 PM
  #3201  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Hague, Holland
Posts: 205
Default

Originally Posted by Holmenkollen
I´m not a team driver but have tested std vs. short wheelbase and dampers behind the tower back to back. Both indoors on carpet and outdoors on tarmac the shorter wheelbase setup is ap. 2/10 faster. The car rotates much faster without feeling lose and it has more steering. The std PHI have a very long wheelbase compared to other cars; actually the "super-short" wheelbase is very close to what Tamiya, Xray and others have from the box. Best to say that I´m driving modified rubber.
So am I (mod, rubber), but with the short wheelbase I was missing out to much grip in the rear, also the car was hard to drive steady, you can be fast one lap but hard to keep it up 5 minutes without overdriving the car.

I'll upload my std wheelbase setup this weekend, it has a lot of steering and is also fast on the tighter shorter tracks. But still holds enough grip in the rear.
Rick Thomson is offline  
Old 06-11-2009, 06:51 PM
  #3202  
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Big Features's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Currituck, North Carolina
Posts: 1,893
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

I done extensive testing with both and I've found the car is best on asphalt
(17.5/13.5) with the narrow steering blocks and super short wheelbase.
I do not run the 42T pullies so I dont know what belt you would use.
You can always call Corally USA and ask.

If you would like, I can post my rubber asphalt setup or send it too you.

Mike
Big Features is offline  
Old 06-12-2009, 02:33 AM
  #3203  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (58)
 
crabboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,001
Trader Rating: 58 (98%+)
Default

Check out the photos of my Phi with super short wheel base at this link,
http://www.rctech.net/forum/5533118-post291.html

You need to use 36 tooth pulleys front and rear, use the standard front belt and a Tamiya MSX or 416 rear belt.

I have only raced it in mod and bitumen and found it to be very very good with good steering and exellent rear grip.

Rhys
crabboy is offline  
Old 06-12-2009, 06:47 AM
  #3204  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 130
Default

Originally Posted by crabboy
Check out the photos of my Phi with super short wheel base at this link,
http://www.rctech.net/forum/5533118-post291.html

You need to use 36 tooth pulleys front and rear, use the standard front belt and a Tamiya MSX or 416 rear belt.

I have only raced it in mod and bitumen and found it to be very very good with good steering and exellent rear grip.

Rhys
Hi, I had a look at the pics of your car. May I ask how you get the weight of the car to be above the minimum required without any weights? and if you add weights where do you put them to get the car to be balanced correctly, side to side and cross weight?

Thanks...
PHI/BMI racer is offline  
Old 06-12-2009, 08:02 AM
  #3205  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (58)
 
crabboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,001
Trader Rating: 58 (98%+)
Default

We race in two different locations, one with a 1425 gram weight limit and the other with a 1525 weight limit.
With the 1425 limit i was able to place some weights on the inside of the lipo tray, then when we do the 1525 limit i place some more weight on the outer side of the lipo itself.
When placing the weights on, i use balance pins to get the weight in the correct spots, you can get it to balance pretty good.
In the pic there are no weights placed on the car as it had just been rewirred and rebuilt, hope this helps.

Rhys
crabboy is offline  
Old 06-12-2009, 08:12 AM
  #3206  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by PHI/BMI racer
Hi, I had a look at the pics of your car. May I ask how you get the weight of the car to be above the minimum required without any weights? and if you add weights where do you put them to get the car to be balanced correctly, side to side and cross weight?

Thanks...
When using the Specialized Battery Adapter Tray, you can use a 5000-6000 mahr battery in the car. That brings up the weight significantly from less hefty lipo packs. Otherwise, with the tray you can run any needed weight basically down the center of the car.

FYI...At this year's IIC, Scotty has dropped the minimum weight for TC to 1425 gm. A very thoughtful move to accommodate our lipo setups. Hopefully, ROAR and other organizations will follow suit.

Bill
Still Bill is offline  
Old 06-12-2009, 08:17 AM
  #3207  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Big Features
I done extensive testing with both and I've found the car is best on asphalt (17.5/13.5) with the narrow steering blocks and super short wheelbase.
Mike
Ditto!
Still Bill is offline  
Old 06-12-2009, 09:04 AM
  #3208  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 130
Default

Originally Posted by crabboy
We race in two different locations, one with a 1425 gram weight limit and the other with a 1525 weight limit.
With the 1425 limit i was able to place some weights on the inside of the lipo tray, then when we do the 1525 limit i place some more weight on the outer side of the lipo itself.
When placing the weights on, i use balance pins to get the weight in the correct spots, you can get it to balance pretty good.
In the pic there are no weights placed on the car as it had just been rewirred and rebuilt, hope this helps.

Rhys
I see you mention you use pins to balance your car, but that only balances left to right, what about cross weight? If the cross weight is not balanced the car will over steer the one way and under steer the other way...
PHI/BMI racer is offline  
Old 06-12-2009, 11:48 AM
  #3209  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by PHI/BMI racer
I see you mention you use pins to balance your car, but that only balances left to right, what about cross weight? If the cross weight is not balanced the car will over steer the one way and under steer the other way...
Agree with PHI/BMI racer about cross weights. I use mini scales for the initial setup to get the four corners done properly.

At the track, I use Irrgang Racing Balance Buttons for checking when adding minor amounts of weight. The buttons are much more accurate than old style balance pins.

Bill
Still Bill is offline  
Old 06-12-2009, 08:58 PM
  #3210  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (58)
 
crabboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,001
Trader Rating: 58 (98%+)
Default

I dont quite agree with that, i think if the car was not balanced left to right (on the balance pins) that would affect steering.....i think.

Rhys

Originally Posted by PHI/BMI racer
If the cross weight is not balanced the car will over steer the one way and under steer the other way...
crabboy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.