Tamiya TB Evolution V
#121
Tech Regular
Originally Posted by Scuad X
Slightly changing the topic on this thread, does anyone know an estimate release or a possibility of a conversion kit from evo iv to evo v?
So no, there won't be a conversion kit.
#122
i highly doubt that there will be a conversion kit as its a totally new tb evolution with new bulkheads (new bottom plate) etc. etc., there's never been a conversion from evo 1 to evo 2, evo 2 to evo 3, or evo 3 to evo 4 so i don't see why they would start now....
I just wanna know what parts they'll improve on this evo 5 for the evo 5MS
I just wanna know what parts they'll improve on this evo 5 for the evo 5MS
#123
Tech Lord
iTrader: (26)
Originally Posted by viet_mafia
i highly doubt that there will be a conversion kit as its a totally new tb evolution with new bulkheads (new bottom plate) etc. etc., there's never been a conversion from evo 1 to evo 2, evo 2 to evo 3, or evo 3 to evo 4 so i don't see why they would start now....
I just wanna know what parts they'll improve on this evo 5 for the evo 5MS
I just wanna know what parts they'll improve on this evo 5 for the evo 5MS
#124
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by rcnewb2004
curious, most ppl want to make the evo V an indoor racer... just wondering... what makes this car more suitable for indoor than out door? I was looking at the specs on the tamiya website and it says it has a minimum clearance of 5mm... isn't that a bit high for minimum clearance?
1) it has the new short wishbones... which if the theory is right (that they are similar in length to the Cyclone arms), then they will the ticket for indoor (Most top TRF drivers seem to use either the cyclone or old TA04 arms indoors).
2) it's a shaft.... and given that current consensus is that shaft is best for stock , and on a par with belt in 19t, and given I won't run more than a 19t indoors anytime soon... should make it a bit of a weapon.
Regarding the ground clearence, I never run less than 5mm indoors, force of habit really, as a number of clubs I ran at had a rule in place to stop people chopping the loop given it couldn't be placed under the racing surface.
Ed
#125
Bring some extra dough to the Reedy Race...you may (or may not) be in for a suprise
The Evo5 is going to be good.
The Evo5 is going to be good.
#126
Tech Master
Thx TryHard,
That sounds cool.
I am wondering does short wishbones = short dog bones... ? so lets say i want to use the LW suspension set instead, do i need new dogbones as well?
Do you guys think the EVO V will have any "future" in mod racing?
That sounds cool.
I am wondering does short wishbones = short dog bones... ? so lets say i want to use the LW suspension set instead, do i need new dogbones as well?
Do you guys think the EVO V will have any "future" in mod racing?
#128
Tech Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MOOD;; feeling good not racing ,saving shed loads of money,lovely Tan i have aswell
Posts: 4,762
Originally Posted by rcnewb2004
I am wondering does short wishbones = short dog bones... ? so lets say i want to use the LW suspension set instead, do i need new dogbones as well?
Do you guys think the EVO V will have any "future" in mod racing?
Do you guys think the EVO V will have any "future" in mod racing?
will go down to 42mm shaft`s to accomodate new wishbone setup
#129
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
To be honest, I doubt it'll need new axles...
if (and it is a big one) the theory that the arms are the same length as the cyclone ones, then simply, I wouldn't have thought they'll change it. The cyclone arms are only 1.5mm R and 1mm F shorter than the current LWT arms, and given that the bearing spacing would still be the same, no need really
The TA04 suspension used short dogbones beacuse a) the arms were shorter, and b) the bearings in the hubs were further apart, and hence longer axles.
HiH
Ed
if (and it is a big one) the theory that the arms are the same length as the cyclone ones, then simply, I wouldn't have thought they'll change it. The cyclone arms are only 1.5mm R and 1mm F shorter than the current LWT arms, and given that the bearing spacing would still be the same, no need really
The TA04 suspension used short dogbones beacuse a) the arms were shorter, and b) the bearings in the hubs were further apart, and hence longer axles.
HiH
Ed
#130
Hopefully they use the same axles since i've got the ti version
It would be interesting if they include the motor heatsink and blue short turnbuckes for the stabiliser and the blue stabiliser ball ends as shown in the pics posted by Masa. Only time can tell. as they don't come standard in the MSX.
It would be interesting if they include the motor heatsink and blue short turnbuckes for the stabiliser and the blue stabiliser ball ends as shown in the pics posted by Masa. Only time can tell. as they don't come standard in the MSX.
Last edited by danjoy25; 05-15-2006 at 05:00 PM. Reason: typo
#131
Originally Posted by danjoy25
Hopefully they use the same axles since i've got the ti version
It would be interesting if they include the motor heatsink and blue short turnbuckes for the stabiliser and the blue stabiliser ball ends as shown in the pics posted by Masa. Only time can tell. as they don't come standard in the MSX.
It would be interesting if they include the motor heatsink and blue short turnbuckes for the stabiliser and the blue stabiliser ball ends as shown in the pics posted by Masa. Only time can tell. as they don't come standard in the MSX.
#132
Sorry about that. I got confused with the TA05 stabiliser set that I just got a few weeks ago. Its all good then. Hopefully we get the heatsink as well.
#133
Dear all,
Interesting new chassis.
Could you mention all new improvement over evo IV so far (roughly by looking the photo only).
I still consider it worth to wait and later compare with the Yoke's LCG.
Thanks for the info.
Interesting new chassis.
Could you mention all new improvement over evo IV so far (roughly by looking the photo only).
I still consider it worth to wait and later compare with the Yoke's LCG.
Thanks for the info.
#134
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by akuhon
Dear all,
Interesting new chassis.
Could you mention all new improvement over evo IV so far (roughly by looking the photo only).
I still consider it worth to wait and later compare with the Yoke's LCG.
Thanks for the info.
Interesting new chassis.
Could you mention all new improvement over evo IV so far (roughly by looking the photo only).
I still consider it worth to wait and later compare with the Yoke's LCG.
Thanks for the info.
#135
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by akuhon
Dear all,
Interesting new chassis.
Could you mention all new improvement over evo IV so far (roughly by looking the photo only).
I still consider it worth to wait and later compare with the Yoke's LCG.
Thanks for the info.
Interesting new chassis.
Could you mention all new improvement over evo IV so far (roughly by looking the photo only).
I still consider it worth to wait and later compare with the Yoke's LCG.
Thanks for the info.