TEKIN BC112 - H27 version
#1
TEKIN BC112 - H27 version
I have the H27 version software in my Tekin BC112.
I can choose from the following:
- P
- P2
- CS
My questions are:
- will the "P" mode work fine on 3000 NIMH batteries ?
- will the "P" mode work fine on SCR2400 NICAD batteries ?
P2 is repeak I believe
CS is cold start.
Is it easy to upgrade the software version ?
Thank's
I can choose from the following:
- P
- P2
- CS
My questions are:
- will the "P" mode work fine on 3000 NIMH batteries ?
- will the "P" mode work fine on SCR2400 NICAD batteries ?
P2 is repeak I believe
CS is cold start.
Is it easy to upgrade the software version ?
Thank's
Last edited by Canuck; 12-14-2002 at 05:30 AM.
#2
Tech Adept
hi,
H27 is fine to charge NiMh, you switch the powerflex off, then select either P or CS. thats what i says in my manual,
For Nicads i personally leave the powerflex on PF3 and then use CS or P.
I occasionally get a false peak with a crap battery if I use P, but I've never had a false peak using CS
have a nice day
sanj
H27 is fine to charge NiMh, you switch the powerflex off, then select either P or CS. thats what i says in my manual,
For Nicads i personally leave the powerflex on PF3 and then use CS or P.
I occasionally get a false peak with a crap battery if I use P, but I've never had a false peak using CS
have a nice day
sanj
#5
Tech Adept
hi canuck,
I have H28 software on mine but I KNOW from the Tekin website when it was up that anything with H26 software or above is fine to charge NiMh.
Whoever said you need H28 its BS.
False peaking can occur anywhere during the charge cycle, feel your batteries after the charger has stopped. are they warm? if not then chances are its a false peak.
I would reccommend you use the CS cycle as it uses some algorithim to work out how flat the battery is and it never seems to false peak on mine. in P mode the peak detection is very senstitive.
I have a manual for the Tekin charger on my website as well as a review.
have a nice day
sanj
I have H28 software on mine but I KNOW from the Tekin website when it was up that anything with H26 software or above is fine to charge NiMh.
Whoever said you need H28 its BS.
False peaking can occur anywhere during the charge cycle, feel your batteries after the charger has stopped. are they warm? if not then chances are its a false peak.
I would reccommend you use the CS cycle as it uses some algorithim to work out how flat the battery is and it never seems to false peak on mine. in P mode the peak detection is very senstitive.
I have a manual for the Tekin charger on my website as well as a review.
have a nice day
sanj
#6
Thank's Sanj. I kind of thought that is was BS ! So many people are quick to give answers but the info is not too precise.
As for your website. I read the review you did on the charger, it's great ! I also have a particular passion for YOKOMO because I just recently acquired a mint Yokomo YR-4M2 with full graphite chassis, graphite front and rear shock towers, full bearing, full cvd's, blue aluminum front and rear arms, blue aluminum front "C" hubs on the car and the rear uprights are also blue aluminum.
I can't find much info on the setup for this car on the net but I have the manual and plenty of spare parts also.
Can't wait till spring !
As for your website. I read the review you did on the charger, it's great ! I also have a particular passion for YOKOMO because I just recently acquired a mint Yokomo YR-4M2 with full graphite chassis, graphite front and rear shock towers, full bearing, full cvd's, blue aluminum front and rear arms, blue aluminum front "C" hubs on the car and the rear uprights are also blue aluminum.
I can't find much info on the setup for this car on the net but I have the manual and plenty of spare parts also.
Can't wait till spring !
#8
So far with my H27 software here's what I will use for charging: (any comments or re-ajustments to the values ?)
Nicad 1500mah sport pack: 4.5 A - CS mode - PF2
SCR1700: 4.5 A - CS mode - PF1
SCR2000: 4.5 A - CS mode - PF1
SCR2400: 5.0 A - CS mode - PF1
3000 NIMH SANYO: 5.0 A - CS mode - PF1
Nicad 1500mah sport pack: 4.5 A - CS mode - PF2
SCR1700: 4.5 A - CS mode - PF1
SCR2000: 4.5 A - CS mode - PF1
SCR2400: 5.0 A - CS mode - PF1
3000 NIMH SANYO: 5.0 A - CS mode - PF1
#9
Tech Adept
for the Nimh use PF0 or basically Powerflex is off.
For the other batteries (nicads) I personally use PF3 but PF2 is what it recommends in my manual.
have a nice day
sanj
For the other batteries (nicads) I personally use PF3 but PF2 is what it recommends in my manual.
have a nice day
sanj
#10
Well on the H27 I have P mode and not P0. So I will use that for the NIMH.
As for the nicads and the Powerflex settings, the PDF manual says the following:
PF1 >> mostly used for SCR cells
PF2 >> normal setting for SCRC, SCE, P-170, 2000 or for general nicad charging. (So I guess it's OK also for SCR NICAD cells ?)
PF3 >> maximum conditioning of cells (I thought this may not be as better as the PF2 ? But you have some experience on this ! Will the pack have less performance on PF3 compared to PF2 ?)
Thank's
As for the nicads and the Powerflex settings, the PDF manual says the following:
PF1 >> mostly used for SCR cells
PF2 >> normal setting for SCRC, SCE, P-170, 2000 or for general nicad charging. (So I guess it's OK also for SCR NICAD cells ?)
PF3 >> maximum conditioning of cells (I thought this may not be as better as the PF2 ? But you have some experience on this ! Will the pack have less performance on PF3 compared to PF2 ?)
Thank's
#11
Sorry, I just realized that what you said about PF0 is correct !
Get's confusing !
As for the nicads and the Powerflex settings, the PDF manual says the following:
PF1 >> mostly used for SCR cells
PF2 >> normal setting for SCRC, SCE, P-170, 2000 or for general nicad charging. (So I guess it's OK also for SCR NICAD cells ?)
PF3 >> maximum conditioning of cells (I thought this may not be as better as the PF2 ? But you have some experience on this ! Will the pack have less performance on PF3 compared to PF2 ?)
Get's confusing !
As for the nicads and the Powerflex settings, the PDF manual says the following:
PF1 >> mostly used for SCR cells
PF2 >> normal setting for SCRC, SCE, P-170, 2000 or for general nicad charging. (So I guess it's OK also for SCR NICAD cells ?)
PF3 >> maximum conditioning of cells (I thought this may not be as better as the PF2 ? But you have some experience on this ! Will the pack have less performance on PF3 compared to PF2 ?)
#12
Tech Adept
when using PF3 or maximum powerflex the burp that it gives the batteries is bigger than on PF1 or PF2,
I just always use PF3 as the cells seem to stay a bit cooler so i think this is a good thing, I don't think there is much difference in it but i'm no electronics expert so can't really say.
have a ncie day
sanj
I just always use PF3 as the cells seem to stay a bit cooler so i think this is a good thing, I don't think there is much difference in it but i'm no electronics expert so can't really say.
have a ncie day
sanj
#15
Tech Adept
you should take the numbers you get out of the charger with caution. there is likely to be some power left in the cells before you charge them hence the actual power you stick into them will be less.
also unless you equalize your cells, then the peak detect will register as soon as the first couple of cells are done.
just one other thing to note, the reading I get from a millenium charger is 2650mAh into a sanyo 2400. However my tekin only register 2260mAh, having discharged the cells both times, there was almost the same power in each +/- 3%.
I think the tekin has much lower resistance in its output circuitry so there is no power wasted in heat build up hence the lower Ah figure.
just my theory....
have a nice day
sanj
also unless you equalize your cells, then the peak detect will register as soon as the first couple of cells are done.
just one other thing to note, the reading I get from a millenium charger is 2650mAh into a sanyo 2400. However my tekin only register 2260mAh, having discharged the cells both times, there was almost the same power in each +/- 3%.
I think the tekin has much lower resistance in its output circuitry so there is no power wasted in heat build up hence the lower Ah figure.
just my theory....
have a nice day
sanj