Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Associated TC5 >

Team Associated TC5

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Team Associated TC5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2009, 12:05 AM
  #10006  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (80)
 
pakk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,082
Trader Rating: 80 (100%+)
Default

Is there a solid eta on this kit? I need to do something about my flying lipos.

--pakk
pakk is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 12:14 AM
  #10007  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
geeunit1014's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,827
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

http://www41.instantestore.net/merch...62/default.cfm

July 1st
geeunit1014 is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:51 AM
  #10008  
Tech Master
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Perth, Australia.
Posts: 1,343
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

That looks quite, looks like a worth while conversion. Even with it costing AUS$100 it still seems quite resonable.
Scooter79rs is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 07:36 AM
  #10009  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Gain Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Down on the corner out in the street
Posts: 249
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by MikeR
It seems every day there is the same dilemmas that us TC5 owners are coping with;

-balanced lipo mounting and weights?
-more flexible chassis for rubber tires or lower traction tracks?
-battery strap or tape the lipo?

I hope the new parts here will help address some of these problems for TC5 owners and maybe bring it up to 2010 spec

http://www.exotekracing.com

Best Always,

Mike
This looks awesome. I am going to try this out.
Gain Time is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 07:44 AM
  #10010  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (88)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,068
Trader Rating: 88 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by geeunit1014
I'll be investing in this, fer ser!
MUDVAYNE is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 08:30 AM
  #10011  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
yodace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Caleb
Posts: 2,596
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

dum question.
Does it come has a complete kit,
TC5X CHASSIS, TC5X EXTRA FLEX TOP PLATE, TC5X BATTERY STRAP and TC5 BEARING CAP? Or do just get the chassis....
yodace is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 08:38 AM
  #10012  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Black Country, England
Posts: 340
Default

Pointless.... when you use that chassis and just move the lipo out further to balance it, you still have to add weight everywhere to get it upto the limit.

Lipo plate on the standard chassis is a far superior (and cheaper) way to do it!
Nick Priest is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 08:55 AM
  #10013  
Tech Adept
 
Redwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 188
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Priest
Pointless.... when you use that chassis and just move the lipo out further to balance it, you still have to add weight everywhere to get it upto the limit.

Lipo plate on the standard chassis is a far superior (and cheaper) way to do it!
Hopefully not for much longer, I hope that the BRCA will lower the weight limit before next season. I'm no expert but maybe 1400-1450 is a realistic new weight limit. I cannot see any reason to keep the extra weight on the cars.

Regards

Neal
Redwood is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 10:54 AM
  #10014  
Tech Addict
 
speedsterblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: TN
Posts: 690
Default

I see Nicks point but not everyone has a min. weight limited or consistenty teched... so not everyone has to add lead to make a min., they just want an easy way to balance it all out... and w/ the pack sicking out & being adjustable, you can put more of the 'required to make a min. weight' more centralized instead of all of it hangin off the side or less 'centralized'.

they mention laterial flex..and does not have the round cell holes in the chassis... that really make any difference? I'd figure AE would design/build the deck w/ the additonal flex from the holes in mind while designing..but I duno.


Lastly, anyone used the lowered layshaft holders? Do they really help? At the price it's worth trying but any feed back is appreshiated. ..anything that frees up the drive train is good to me! ..Lowering the CG of the spur 1.25mm, has to help in theroy but is it noticable in the real world?
speedsterblade is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:14 AM
  #10015  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (88)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,068
Trader Rating: 88 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by speedsterblade
Lastly, anyone used the lowered layshaft holders? Do they really help? At the price it's worth trying but any feed back is appreshiated. ..anything that frees up the drive train is good to me! ..Lowering the CG of the spur 1.25mm, has to help in theroy but is it noticable in the real world?
I have them installed, and they help out alot in my opinion. I have the duff adjusters both moved towards the layshaft, and I have lots of play now. Well worth the money IMO.
MUDVAYNE is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:15 AM
  #10016  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (88)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,068
Trader Rating: 88 (100%+)
Default

The only thing that bothers me about the chassis is the fact that my Lipo has the nubs on the bottom like the NiMH cells, and I'm not sure if I can grind these off or not.
MUDVAYNE is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:16 AM
  #10017  
wyd
Tech Legend
iTrader: (51)
 
wyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Castle Mamba Max Pro. Feel its power!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 21,220
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)
Default

I like the new chassis setup. After I run my TC5 the next two weekends and see how it runs with the changes I have made and my lipo tray I have now to try out. If I don't need to spend 100 bucks I won't but at least I know a really nice setup is available as an option.
wyd is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:20 AM
  #10018  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Black Country, England
Posts: 340
Default

Originally Posted by speedsterblade
I see Nicks point but not everyone has a min. weight limited or consistenty teched... so not everyone has to add lead to make a min., they just want an easy way to balance it all out... and w/ the pack sicking out & being adjustable, you can put more of the 'required to make a min. weight' more centralized instead of all of it hangin off the side or less 'centralized'.

they mention laterial flex..and does not have the round cell holes in the chassis... that really make any difference? I'd figure AE would design/build the deck w/ the additonal flex from the holes in mind while designing..but I duno.


Lastly, anyone used the lowered layshaft holders? Do they really help? At the price it's worth trying but any feed back is appreshiated. ..anything that frees up the drive train is good to me! ..Lowering the CG of the spur 1.25mm, has to help in theroy but is it noticable in the real world?
i wouldn't have thought not having cell holes would make a difference as when you strap a lipo to a normal chassis it stiffens it right up anyway and affects the flex, thats why 6 bell packs are good because they do allow the chassis flex more evenly.
Nick Priest is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:27 AM
  #10019  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
hound_dogs_01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,091
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

So will an SMC 7.4V 6000mah 28C pack fit ont he TC5?

Also what are the differences between the early TC5's where there was only one car? no TC5f or TC5r just the TC5

How can you tell the difference between the 2?

Thanks
Alex
hound_dogs_01 is offline  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:52 AM
  #10020  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
geeunit1014's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,827
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by MUDVAYNE
The only thing that bothers me about the chassis is the fact that my Lipo has the nubs on the bottom like the NiMH cells, and I'm not sure if I can grind these off or not.
I run the IP 5000 which has the nubs on it. I just shimmed up the battery strap (exotek one) 2mm and its great no need to grind off the nubs
geeunit1014 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.