TLR 22-4 2.0 Race Kit Thread!
|
|||
#646
#648
#649
#650
I'm going to switch to a 22-4 2.0 once they come back in stock and have a couple of questions that I wasn't able to find answers to in this thread or on FB.
What size is the thread on the tie rods? I'm used to M3 threads on my AE cars and on my Tamiya cars. I want to make sure I have the correct left hand tap size on hand to thread the ball cups. I have a suspicion the TLR tie rods are larger based on some info I've dug up but would like it confirmed.
Also would a 22-4 1.0 chassis protector fit the 2.0 chassis? I haven't seen where 2.0 chassis protectors have been called out and it seems like horizons own side shows the 1.0 chassis protector under the 2.0 option parts. Just looking for confirmation that the above is correct since i know the actual chassis plates are different between versions.
Thanks.
What size is the thread on the tie rods? I'm used to M3 threads on my AE cars and on my Tamiya cars. I want to make sure I have the correct left hand tap size on hand to thread the ball cups. I have a suspicion the TLR tie rods are larger based on some info I've dug up but would like it confirmed.
Also would a 22-4 1.0 chassis protector fit the 2.0 chassis? I haven't seen where 2.0 chassis protectors have been called out and it seems like horizons own side shows the 1.0 chassis protector under the 2.0 option parts. Just looking for confirmation that the above is correct since i know the actual chassis plates are different between versions.
Thanks.
#651
The 1.0 chassis protectors fits perfect and I'm pretty sure the turnbuckles are M3, but don't quote me on that one.
#652
What's the part number for the aluminum rear hubs? Thanks
#653
I'm going to switch to a 22-4 2.0 once they come back in stock and have a couple of questions that I wasn't able to find answers to in this thread or on FB.
What size is the thread on the tie rods? I'm used to M3 threads on my AE cars and on my Tamiya cars. I want to make sure I have the correct left hand tap size on hand to thread the ball cups. I have a suspicion the TLR tie rods are larger based on some info I've dug up but would like it confirmed.
Also would a 22-4 1.0 chassis protector fit the 2.0 chassis? I haven't seen where 2.0 chassis protectors have been called out and it seems like horizons own side shows the 1.0 chassis protector under the 2.0 option parts. Just looking for confirmation that the above is correct since i know the actual chassis plates are different between versions.
Thanks.
What size is the thread on the tie rods? I'm used to M3 threads on my AE cars and on my Tamiya cars. I want to make sure I have the correct left hand tap size on hand to thread the ball cups. I have a suspicion the TLR tie rods are larger based on some info I've dug up but would like it confirmed.
Also would a 22-4 1.0 chassis protector fit the 2.0 chassis? I haven't seen where 2.0 chassis protectors have been called out and it seems like horizons own side shows the 1.0 chassis protector under the 2.0 option parts. Just looking for confirmation that the above is correct since i know the actual chassis plates are different between versions.
Thanks.
TLR334014, but it has one less hole on the inside.
#654
#655
Tech Adept
Is the new 22-4 2.0 alot better than the older 22-4
#656
I've got both. I wouldn't say alot better. To me both are the same just the gear diffs and 22 rear suspension make a slight improvement. You can put the 22 rear suspension on the 1.0 with no modification. Yet both cars are very good. The new front bulkhead on the 2.0 is the weak link on this car.
#657
Who has a front pivot they want to sell?
#658
Tech Champion
iTrader: (515)
Week #2 and win #2. The car is still planted and predictable. This week I ran against fast guys. One local fast guy had me by a second a lap but something happened to his esc and his car shut down. The other faster guy was .4 faster but he made a lot of mistakes and I cruised in for a relatively easy win. The car is still all stock, no upgrades yet.
#659
Will there be any issues if go with a horizontal ball stud mount on a rear camber block? Should I stay with the vertical ball mount that comes standard on the 2.0? I am asking because I somehow snapped the stock rear camber block this past week and found that Exotek makes some thicker looking rear camber blocks but only with the 1.0 style. The part number that I am referring to is TLR334026. Thanks again for your time guys, I knew that it was handling weird for some odd reason then snap it's down for the count. Oh and BTW my 22 3.0 is coming along nicely should have it done later this week to take out on the track. And one last thing the track that i run on is a medium/high bite clay track.
Last edited by SickNT760; 10-16-2016 at 03:41 AM. Reason: needed to add some info
#660
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
@SickNT760, the original horizontal 1.0 rear block works, and has the same mounting points as the newer 2.0 vertical block. The Exotek block is horizontal as well, like the 1.0, but has two additional lower holes, for more rotation. The TLR vertical block came out as an option for the 1.0 and is now standard on the 2.0. To get the same lower mounting holes like the Exotek, you simply remove the 1mm spacers from the vertical block, ya follow? So the 2.0 vertical block works, but you can snap a stud off, but yes, buy the Exotek, and you'll have the mounting points from a 2.0 vertical block.