Team Associated B6 & B6D thread
|
|||
#1816
I think gluing may have helped more years ago when CF manufacutring was pretty bad. CF laminate construction is much better with better resins, so I question if gluing does much more than cosmetic protection.
Mine cracked through the screw hole weak point like others I've seen.
#1817
No shocked.
Need to figure out some sort of lexan cover for the shock towers. Should help them scrub instead of dig in.
Need to figure out some sort of lexan cover for the shock towers. Should help them scrub instead of dig in.
#1818
#1820
Tech Elite
iTrader: (142)
#1821
#1822
#1823
Tech Elite
iTrader: (45)
Rear of arm = More weight transfer to rear on acceleration/more forward traction/less on power steering
Front of arm = Less weight transfer to rear on acceleration/less forward traction/more on power steering
#1824
Tech Elite
iTrader: (45)
Since people are talking front/rear shocks, I actually looked closely at the side by side overhead comparison of the B6D and B6. I didn't realize how far back the rear mount shocks/B6D pushes the wing back!
http://www.rccaraction.com/wp-conten...s-Compare2.jpg
Also, I wonder if it'd help to round some of those CF corners a little bit if/when everyone is sealing their towers?
http://www.rccaraction.com/wp-conten...s-Compare2.jpg
Also, I wonder if it'd help to round some of those CF corners a little bit if/when everyone is sealing their towers?
#1826
Tech Adept
It wouldn't hurt to reference the impact to the front wheels as well. I always look at it as shocks on the front of the arm share the shock weight with the front wheels (add weight to the front wheels, reduce the shock weight on the rear wheel), while shocks to the rear of the arm have the rear wheel share the full burden of the shock, and remove weight from the front.
Rear of arm = More weight transfer to rear on acceleration/more forward traction/less on power steering
Front of arm = Less weight transfer to rear on acceleration/less forward traction/more on power steering
Rear of arm = More weight transfer to rear on acceleration/more forward traction/less on power steering
Front of arm = Less weight transfer to rear on acceleration/less forward traction/more on power steering
#1827
Tech Elite
iTrader: (45)
Few care what it IS (which is what you provided), most care what it DOES (which is what I was trying to explain).
Edit: What I'm getting at is while it is changing the weight distribution, it isn't weight between the wheelbases which is pretty straight forward. That is simple static weight distribution. In this case one of the configurations has weight being put BEHIND the axle.
#1829
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
Yes.
I think gluing may have helped more years ago when CF manufacutring was pretty bad. CF laminate construction is much better with better resins, so I question if gluing does much more than cosmetic protection.
Mine cracked through the screw hole weak point like others I've seen.
I think gluing may have helped more years ago when CF manufacutring was pretty bad. CF laminate construction is much better with better resins, so I question if gluing does much more than cosmetic protection.
Mine cracked through the screw hole weak point like others I've seen.
Last edited by Wildcat1971; 07-21-2016 at 04:58 PM.
#1830