Originally Posted by MadRiderSD
(Post 14113983)
If any of you have driven or currently owns a mbx7eco , would pick .3?
Mugen: Pro: Lots of turn-in. Lots of overall steering. Glides through hair pins with ease. Chassis very balance. Very stable. More space to fit a fan/cooling fin for the motor. Can accomodate bigger ESC. The car is not so finicky on tires. Cons: More flimsy plastic materials. Wears out easily. The parts design are not as well thought out as Tekno. The original suspension setting seems very soft, the car bottoms out easily after jump, and tends to traction roll easily. After around 15 runs the lower a-arm broke without any crash. 48.3: Very stable jumps, especially landing. Car act like a suckion cup. Very well thought out parts design, basically fixed all the small hick ups of the 48.2. Very good quality plastic parts. Car sturdy like a tank. Quite sensitive and responsive to tires and setting changes. Cons: Not as much steering as the MBX, especially turn in. Getting out of the corner need a bit of wrestling, car would tell me I throttle too much too early by giving me a wriggle on its tail. I keep all the reinforcement struts, as I once bent a chassis of my .2 right after I took off the mid and rear struts. With the struts off I am sure the car would have more traction and steering, but I just won't risk a chassis to do that. The space is too cramp, I think the ESC mounting space is designed for Tekin. My verdict: Mylaps tell me out of the box I am about half a sec faster with my Mugen. I miss my Mugen as I wrestle the .3 out of hairpins. However, the .3 shine on jumps, bring a big grin on my face. My .02 cents |
the ?? is which one do you used more now the mugen or the tekno
|
Originally Posted by blackshark3
(Post 14120513)
3 weeks ago, I ran my newly built MBX7r ECO, just couple of days ago I ran my newly built 48.3. Both cars according to stock setup, and have identical electronics and tires.
Mugen: Pro: Lots of turn-in. Lots of overall steering. Glides through hair pins with ease. Chassis very balance. Very stable. More space to fit a fan/cooling fin for the motor. Can accomodate bigger ESC. The car is not so finicky on tires. Cons: More flimsy plastic materials. Wears out easily. The parts design are not as well thought out as Tekno. The original suspension setting seems very soft, the car bottoms out easily after jump, and tends to traction roll easily. After around 15 runs the lower a-arm broke without any crash. 48.3: Very stable jumps, especially landing. Car act like a suckion cup. Very well thought out parts design, basically fixed all the small hick ups of the 48.2. Very good quality plastic parts. Car sturdy like a tank. Quite sensitive and responsive to tires and setting changes. Cons: Not as much steering as the MBX, especially turn in. Getting out of the corner need a bit of wrestling, car would tell me I throttle too much too early by giving me a wriggle on its tail. I keep all the reinforcement struts, as I once bent a chassis of my .2 right after I took off the mid and rear struts. With the struts off I am sure the car would have more traction and steering, but I just won't risk a chassis to do that. The space is too cramp, I think the ESC mounting space is designed for Tekin. My verdict: Mylaps tell me out of the box I am about half a sec faster with my Mugen. I miss my Mugen as I wrestle the .3 out of hairpins. However, the .3 shine on jumps, bring a big grin on my face. My .02 cents |
Anyone fine a better shock boot for this car the stock ones are like to big and get pinched between the spring and spring perch on compression. After running them for a little while it looks like someone took a knife to them.
|
I've been happy with the new boots.
|
Originally Posted by CAR
(Post 14121536)
Anyone fine a better shock boot for this car the stock ones are like to big and get pinched between the spring and spring perch on compression. After running them for a little while it looks like someone took a knife to them.
|
Originally Posted by CAR
(Post 14121536)
Anyone fine a better shock boot for this car the stock ones are like to big and get pinched between the spring and spring perch on compression. After running them for a little while it looks like someone took a knife to them.
|
Originally Posted by micrors4guy
(Post 14121916)
Take the smallest hole on your punch and put a hole way up at the top. Pount the hole to the back of the car. The air wont blow the boot up and into the spring this way.
|
Originally Posted by CAR
(Post 14121965)
I don't think this will help much because of the amount of cuts the are in the boots.
|
Originally Posted by Matthew_Armeni
(Post 14122003)
I believe he was suggesting that you try this with a new set of boots :)
|
Anyone else having the screws from the mudguards rubbing on the body shell ?
|
I have had this on certain bodies. I am thinking about using a countersink bit on the guard and using a countersunk screw for it to fit flush.
|
screws rubbing
Originally Posted by wraithperth
(Post 14122994)
Anyone else having the screws from the mudguards rubbing on the body shell ?
|
Originally Posted by wraithperth
(Post 14122994)
Anyone else having the screws from the mudguards rubbing on the body shell ?
|
I just purchased a used EB48.2. Can I slowly replace my existing parts to the new .3 - or does it all need to be changed at once to work?
|
All times are GMT -7. It is currently 04:49 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.8
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.