Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Tekno RC SCT410.3 Thread >

Tekno RC SCT410.3 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree219Likes

Tekno RC SCT410.3 Thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 09-05-2022, 08:19 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Tekno RC SCT410.3 Thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: rustyus
Welcome to the SCT410.3 Wiki!

7.26.17 - BB
In order to run the recommended team setup, you need the following optional parts:
TKR6106 Orange LF Springs
TKR6114 Green LF Springs
TKR6018 composite shock caps (built to emulsion) OR TKR8702 Aluminum Emulsion Shock caps
TKR8027 Shock Stand Offs
TKR6051 8x1.3 pistons(drilled to 1.4mm)
TKR8104 .4 bellcranks
TKR8100 .4 ackerman
TKR5545B HRC Hubs
You also need the Aluminum C Block (others can stay composite)

What option parts should I consider buying with a new kit?
None are required but we recommend the following:

TKR5161 – V2 Adjustable Hinge Pin Brace “A” block, 7075 CNC, EB/NB/ET/NT/SCT) - Helps to improve durability on hard crashes.

TKR5163 – V2 Adjustable Hinge Pin Brace “C” block, 7075 CNC, EB/NB/ET/NT/SCT) - Helps to improve durability on hard crashes.

TKR5545B – HRC Rear Hubs (L/R, CV or uni, SCT.3/SL) - Improves stability of the rear on mid to corner exit. Allows harder acceleration on corner exit.

TKR6146 - CNC Delrin Shock Cartridge Set

TiNi Shock Shafts
-TKR6004T (front)
-TKR6017T (rear)


What spare parts should I keep on hand?
TKR5020 – Hinge Pins (inner, front/rear)
TKR5516 – Front Suspension Arms and TKR5515 – Rear Suspension Arms
TKR5542 – Spindle Carriers - TKR5541B Spindles
TKR6009 – Shock O-Ring and Bladder Set (for 2 shocks)

Tips and Tricks

List of Vehicle Setup Adjustments and Build Tips can be found here. There are several videos and articles detailing the building of shocks, diffs, camber links, etc.

Use steering stops/limiter washers... more info here.

Setup Sheets:
Setup sheets for all Tekno RC vehicles can be found here. Please be sure to try our recommended setup. It works very well on most tracks.




Hinge Pin Insert Chart:

Warranty Policy:
Tekno RC is the only company in the industry that will give 50% off of parts if returned to them using the General Warranty return policy found on their website. The parts can be lightly used or completely abused, as long as the part is still being produced it's covered!

Piston Drills:
Some of our setups recommend using pistons that are enlarged. For instance 4x1.9 or 3x2.0. To drill the pistons we recommend the following:
GMK Supply Piston Drill Set
16PC Metric Bit Set Metric Sizes 2.00 to 3.00 MM.





















Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2016, 10:01 AM
  #3481  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 294
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by FAO
Tekno RC created this layout for a 1/8 scale buggy with 4 cells at the left side. So that´s nearly double the weight of our batteries with 2 cells.
i dont know about that cause , as per phone conversation with tekno . that truck was tekno balanced & fitted for 2 cells. i just never bothered to ask for the battery weight . due to my set up being 3 cell.
SerpJimmy is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 10:08 AM
  #3482  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kingsport, TN (Still SC tho)
Posts: 855
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Lowe's48
It was around 60% right and 40% left. My battery is 331 grams.After the mod the weight bias is now almost 50/50 front to rear and left to right.

Does it jump level with very little throttle input and is easy to correct in the air?
qstorm777 is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 12:30 PM
  #3483  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 27
Default

Lowes48 I will be the next to do this. Been thinking of doing this after I saw a post on a different forum of someone doing this. Did you have to change much on the rear setup with more weight back there. I see you have real short rear links. And if I may ask why do you have your shocks in on the tower in the front. And out on the tower in the rear? I run a track just like that. With that kind of clay and I run M4 primes just like you are.
taz169 is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 01:27 PM
  #3484  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (58)
 
8ight-e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,175
Trader Rating: 58 (100%+)
Default

Is there a recent 'pro' setup for this truck. Looking for something on a med bite hard packed dirt.. grooves up in the line a little bit at times w/ some loom on the edges.
8ight-e is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 01:33 PM
  #3485  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,167
Default

Originally Posted by 8ight-e
Is there a recent 'pro' setup for this truck. Looking for something on a med bite hard packed dirt.. grooves up in the line a little bit at times w/ some loom on the edges.
Look for Jeremy's setup from dirt road stampede. I liked it a lot.
ezlight is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 06:44 PM
  #3486  
Tech Adept
 
JoeRC123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 183
Default

Just picked up a new kit for one of these and found this cool thread. Bought it for indoor dirt track a mile or so from my house. I'll be around.
JoeRC123 is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 07:47 PM
  #3487  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Lowe's48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,016
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE=SerpJimmy;14504985]So i'm now wondering what Weight battery tekno used to balance ?

Also, To eliminate some inconsistency, did you also balance without shocks & Wheels attached ?

Was Car coming in contact with scale in exact same location on all scales?

Switch scales around?

I noticed you removed the mud guards from earlier photo . Reason for that ? [QUOTE]



I think the only way to have the original configuration balance is to use the heaviest 2s you can find,low profile servo,lightest esc like Orion r10 and a 540 can motor. And maybe it might be close but the choice of those components are limited!!
I would never run my car without shocks/wheels so....no i didn't weight the car without those , unless i'm missing your point.
I did weigh it several times and the results are the same. The first 3 pics are my friend's car i was working on . I do not run mud guards.

Last edited by Lowe's48; 04-25-2016 at 08:22 PM.
Lowe's48 is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 08:04 PM
  #3488  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Lowe's48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,016
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by qstorm777
Does it jump level with very little throttle input and is easy to correct in the air?
To be honest,I don't think that the stock configuration have any thing to do with the nose down issues that a lot of people are complaining about.To me its more the set up such as springs,oil and perhaps the anti-squat that would have more influence with an attitude of the car in the air.
Here's a video of my truck(yellow/white) on a very good size triple without holding on to the throttle or using brake.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3TGTug73lE
Lowe's48 is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 08:20 PM
  #3489  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Lowe's48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,016
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by taz169
Lowes48 I will be the next to do this. Been thinking of doing this after I saw a post on a different forum of someone doing this. Did you have to change much on the rear setup with more weight back there. I see you have real short rear links. And if I may ask why do you have your shocks in on the tower in the front. And out on the tower in the rear? I run a track just like that. With that kind of clay and I run M4 primes just like you are.
Hey taz
Regarding to the rear,I'm running the same setup as I did prior but I actually lighten the oil up front to help the weight transfer while going through turn.
Our clay is very very very tacky and will traction roll anything including stock,mod and 4x4 buggy with 15mm ride height. I run short link in the rear because I want a lot of camber gain when I'm going in the turn. Same reason why I run the shocks that way.I'm just trying to loose the rear end so it doesn't grab going in to the turn and traction roll. So,I lean the front shocks in for more bite and stand up the rear for less bite.
I hope that help.
Lowe's48 is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 10:10 PM
  #3490  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 294
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE=Lowe's48;14506040][QUOTE=SerpJimmy;14504985]So i'm now wondering what Weight battery tekno used to balance ?

Also, To eliminate some inconsistency, did you also balance without shocks & Wheels attached ?

Was Car coming in contact with scale in exact same location on all scales?

Switch scales around?

I noticed you removed the mud guards from earlier photo . Reason for that ?



I think the only way to have the original configuration balance is to use the heaviest 2s you can find,low profile servo,lightest esc like Orion r10 and a 540 can motor. And maybe it might be close but the choice of those components are limited!!
I would never run my car without shocks/wheels so....no i didn't weight the car without those , unless i'm missing your point.
I did weigh it several times and the results are the same. The first 3 pics are my friend's car i was working on . I do not run mud guards.
Unbalanced wheels need to removed when balancing entire truck due inconsistencies. Or weigh & balance them ..
Shocks need to removed due to variable shock oil fill level/weight. *More importantly , Inconsistent / variable spring rates can influence down pressure on wheels.
SerpJimmy is offline  
Old 04-25-2016, 10:40 PM
  #3491  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Lowe's48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,016
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

[QUOTE=SerpJimmy;14506193][QUOTE=Lowe's48;14506040]
Originally Posted by SerpJimmy
So i'm now wondering what Weight battery tekno used to balance ?

Also, To eliminate some inconsistency, did you also balance without shocks & Wheels attached ?

Was Car coming in contact with scale in exact same location on all scales?

Switch scales around?

I noticed you removed the mud guards from earlier photo . Reason for that ?

Unbalanced wheels need to removed when balancing entire truck due inconsistencies. Or weigh & balance them ..
Shocks need to removed due to variable shock oil fill level/weight. *More importantly , Inconsistent / variable spring rates can influence down pressure on wheels.
Got it.
I'm happy with where I'm at . All I know is the car was way off balance with the components I have installed and now it balanced both on scale and how it handle on the track.If you're running a 3s set up you should have it very close.
Lowe's48 is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 07:39 AM
  #3492  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (65)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 3,073
Trader Rating: 65 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Lowe's48
I've been working on my Tekno for a little over a year trying to get it as good or better than my previous truck(scte). It has been a challenge to say the least but i do love the challenge and i do love this truck.
I've always feel that the truck lacking on a right turn layout and have spend a lot of time chasing setups,tires,springs etc. Finally ....as i scale the truck and to my surprise the truck isn't balance from left to right.(heavier on right side) Battery mod only move the weight slightly back but not side to side. I knew what i have to do but dragging my feet knowing the the esc wires are too short to relocate to the left rear of the truck. But one night after taking a podium on a Saturday night race in most of the time but never the 1st place, i came home and get busy on the job in hand.
Anyway,the Hobbywing fit perfectly on the left rear and since i was in a cutting mode i also eliminated the radio box to loose 26 more grams .
I thought i would share this with you guys because i know i'm tired of chasing those Losi guys lol
and happy to say i podium in 1st this wkd with only a few laps on this new change.

A short video of on track practice(white/yellow car)on a very high traction indoor track.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3TGTug73lE





Very nice! I'm reconfiguring my electronics layout the same as yours to test it out except I'm leaving the receiver in the stock location.
Antimullet is offline  
Old 04-26-2016, 02:15 PM
  #3493  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Lowe's48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,016
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Antimullet
Very nice! I'm reconfiguring my electronics layout the same as yours to test it out except I'm leaving the receiver in the stock location.
Good luck bud.
I don't run my cars outdoor so the receiver box isn't necessary for me.
Lowe's48 is offline  
Old 04-27-2016, 04:24 PM
  #3494  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 144
Trader Rating: 12 (93%+)
Default

Has anyone tried VRP game changer Pistons yet ?
Scottysspeedsho is offline  
Old 04-27-2016, 04:53 PM
  #3495  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
bds81175's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Litchfield, Minnesota
Posts: 2,745
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

I talked to the owner of VRP and he said there is design work going on with the game changers for the Tekno. He's apparently working directly with Ryan Lutz on coming up with a package. I'm going to give them a shot as soon as I hear that they have found something that works well.
bds81175 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.