Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Biggest Baddest Brushless on the planet!! >

Biggest Baddest Brushless on the planet!!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Biggest Baddest Brushless on the planet!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2014, 06:22 PM
  #1  
Tech Regular
Thread Starter
 
twissted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Between a rock and a hard spot! In WA.
Posts: 295
Default Biggest Baddest Brushless on the planet!!

This is a stretched XB-E that is currently getting new diff housings in front and rear they and the wheel hubs are made by 7075rc. 24mm hex adapters are Ramtech and the motor is the beast 524 2Y 910 kv motor with 200 amp esc that has caps added running on 8s Nano-tech 65-130c 5000 lipos. carbon fiber body is vac bagged with impact resin making it 18 time stronger than the losi body. And is lighter to boot!

SORRY GUYS NO PICTURES AS THIS WEB SITE WILL NOT LET ME POST ANY URL. SO THAT TAKE PHOTOBUCKET OUT !!!!
iT ALSO TAKES YOUTUBE OUT!!!!
twissted is offline  
Old 01-19-2014, 06:24 PM
  #2  
Tech Regular
Thread Starter
 
twissted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Between a rock and a hard spot! In WA.
Posts: 295
Default

But if you look at youtube look up losi 5 hybrid or stretched XB-E. I wish I could do more for you!
twissted is offline  
Old 01-19-2014, 07:57 PM
  #3  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
asc6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Meridian Idaho
Posts: 3,412
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

If you were part of the community with some relatively decent posts you would be able to post pics. Until then, whine all you want but without pics, it ain't real.
asc6000 is offline  
Old 01-19-2014, 08:19 PM
  #4  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
rcjunky1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,202
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

rcjunky1 is offline  
Old 01-19-2014, 08:21 PM
  #5  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Hoese37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hutchinson, MN
Posts: 3,819
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

8S? That's cute. Theres a 12S out there somewhere...
Hoese37 is offline  
Old 01-19-2014, 10:37 PM
  #6  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 227
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Yeah, come back when you're at least at this level:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtjOcGdc85A
stascom is offline  
Old 01-19-2014, 11:15 PM
  #7  
Tech Master
iTrader: (32)
 
VenturaDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ventura, SoCal
Posts: 1,133
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by stascom
Yeah, come back when you're at least at this level:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtjOcGdc85A
That's a great tire glue job haha
VenturaDC is offline  
Old 01-19-2014, 11:35 PM
  #8  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
orangutanracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 140
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Where is the carbon fiber body?
I'm curious to see how a ridged body will do in a crash. I bet it transfers energy and breaks other stuff.
orangutanracer is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 01:22 AM
  #9  
Tech Master
iTrader: (29)
 
egobrkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,949
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

What I find funny is you do all this work and spend all that money and you use cheap nano tech lipos? I'm sure that there are others esc's out there that can run 8s but the only one I know is MGM and they are $500.
egobrkr is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 01:40 AM
  #10  
Tech Master
iTrader: (32)
 
VenturaDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ventura, SoCal
Posts: 1,133
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

What exactly is wrong with the nano tech batts?
VenturaDC is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 01:53 AM
  #11  
Tech Master
iTrader: (29)
 
egobrkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,949
Trader Rating: 29 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by VenturaDC
What exactly is wrong with the nano tech batts?
There is nothing wrong with them. This application will need something with better power, lowest internal resistance ect.... the the nano techs cant provide. There are much better choices out there that would give the power needed to do what this guy is doing. Nano tecks just are not the best choice. The best way that I can say it is would you put walmart brand tires on a Ferrari Enzo or would you put on Pirelli's. The walmart tires will work but not the best choice for the application.
egobrkr is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 07:16 AM
  #12  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 569
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by egobrkr
There is nothing wrong with them. This application will need something with better power, lowest internal resistance ect.... the the nano techs cant provide. There are much better choices out there that would give the power needed to do what this guy is doing. Nano tecks just are not the best choice. The best way that I can say it is would you put walmart brand tires on a Ferrari Enzo or would you put on Pirelli's. The walmart tires will work but not the best choice for the application.
So how about some actual numbers and pics for proof of this? Since so many companies all sell THE SAME DAMN BATTERIES with different labels on them, how do you know they aren't the same OEM as the Hv lipos in your sig?

Stop regurgitating internet rumors, and supply hard data and pics to back up your claim please.
DsWright is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 07:30 AM
  #13  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (71)
 
mkiiina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 2,414
Trader Rating: 71 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by egobrkr
There is nothing wrong with them. This application will need something with better power, lowest internal resistance ect.... the the nano techs cant provide. There are much better choices out there that would give the power needed to do what this guy is doing. Nano tecks just are not the best choice. The best way that I can say it is would you put walmart brand tires on a Ferrari Enzo or would you put on Pirelli's. The walmart tires will work but not the best choice for the application.
That's a horrible comparison. Secondly I don't think you have much actual data to back this up. A few weekends ago we were sitting around the pits between races and started testing some of our batteries to see what the IR's looked like. The Nanotech 2s 6000's I had came in a 3.5, some Orcas came in at 3.0, EAM's came in around 4, and SMC's were similiar at 4, Gen Ace 5000's were higher at 4.5.

All packs were tested on the same charger and were of similiar age.
mkiiina is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 07:30 AM
  #14  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (48)
 
lbenton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fort Worth Tx
Posts: 2,127
Trader Rating: 48 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by twissted
But if you look at youtube look up losi 5 hybrid or stretched XB-E. I wish I could do more for you!
This did pull up some results but I am not sure if I am getting what you are trying to share with us.

I am not sure if you can IM the link any better than you can post them without approval / established member status. But I would gladly put a link on here for you if I knew which was what you intended.
lbenton is offline  
Old 01-20-2014, 08:42 AM
  #15  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
huzzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Hemet
Posts: 704
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by egobrkr
There is nothing wrong with them. This application will need something with better power, lowest internal resistance ect.... the the nano techs cant provide. There are much better choices out there that would give the power needed to do what this guy is doing. Nano tecks just are not the best choice. The best way that I can say it is would you put walmart brand tires on a Ferrari Enzo or would you put on Pirelli's. The walmart tires will work but not the best choice for the application.
LOL ignorance is bliss.
huzzler is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.