Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread >

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree137Likes

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 04-22-2024, 12:09 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: RCBuddha
Quick link to the front page

First Page

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2016, 03:15 PM
  #25561  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sellersville PA
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by Just2much19
Jason did a YouTube video on this, you can search for it on YouTube or google. He says that with the larger rims you get less walking around and is better for high bite tracks as opposed to the smaller rims where you get some more cushion for bumps. The newer rims are easier and take less glue.

It all comes down to preference and availability. Also with such a small difference I am sure t would be hard to tell the difference but then again I haven't tried them, just going off what I've read and heard.
Thanks!!! I'll check out the video
JP187 is offline  
Old 02-15-2016, 03:16 PM
  #25562  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sellersville PA
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by tc5 man
If it's the Front wheels actually for me i could tell a difrence the 2.4 wheels and tires smoothed the steering out more side bite . The 2.2 Fronts more steering feel and turn in better on bumps .

2.2 rears and 2.4 only difference I could tell with them is the 2.2 have more side bite/ handle bumps stay glued better .

2.4 rears are lighter traction wise to me it's less but still grip good bad on bumps though and stating glued but I fixed that issue .
Thanks for the Info!!
JP187 is offline  
Old 02-15-2016, 08:14 PM
  #25563  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (515)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Antelope Valley, CA
Posts: 5,090
Trader Rating: 515 (100%+)
Default

The 2.4s are for smoother tracks. That's really what they are designed for. When the track is smooth they work great. The only issue that I've seen with them is the side walls ripping/tearing on high bite surfaces. They are also about 10 grams lighter per wheel/tire.
QDRHRSE is offline  
Old 02-15-2016, 10:02 PM
  #25564  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sellersville PA
Posts: 48
Default

Whats the preference on battery for this car? Square pack or shorty ?
JP187 is offline  
Old 02-15-2016, 10:15 PM
  #25565  
Tech Prophet
 
tc5 man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: levittown pa
Posts: 16,997
Default

Originally Posted by JP187
Whats the preference on battery for this car? Square pack or shorty ?


Most run Shorty packs including myself for indoor tracks .
tc5 man is offline  
Old 02-16-2016, 09:35 PM
  #25566  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 218
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JP187
Whats the preference on battery for this car? Square pack or shorty ?
I would definitely go with a shorty. If you happen to go with a low rider trans it will work with that as well. Also with the shorty you can position it forward to improve weight distribution as well as being lighter. Many companies have them cheap including SMC, dinogylipos and plenty more.
Just2much19 is offline  
Old 02-16-2016, 09:38 PM
  #25567  
Tech Apprentice
 
Cerevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: West KY
Posts: 73
Default

New to the buggy world, having a t5m though the b5m seems like what I will want when the time comes to get one.
Thanks for all the good info in this thread!
Cerevo is offline  
Old 02-16-2016, 09:48 PM
  #25568  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 218
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cerevo
New to the buggy world, having a t5m though the b5m seems like what I will want when the time comes to get one.
Thanks for all the good info in this thread!
Welcome and I would keep an eye on the for sale section, there are a lot of complete and already modded out B5Ms for a good price.
Just2much19 is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 05:01 AM
  #25569  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
DennisNyholm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 489
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Silly question, but if I mix 25 wt oil and 30 wt oil 50:50, will it be 27.5 wt oil? I have both and want to try 27.5.
DennisNyholm is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 05:09 AM
  #25570  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (36)
 
Jerm13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The 405
Posts: 3,251
Trader Rating: 36 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DennisNyholm
Silly question, but if I mix 25 wt oil and 30 wt oil 50:50, will it be 27.5 wt oil? I have both and want to try 27.5.
Ish... math wise yes, viscosity wise not so easy. You can try it and see if you like the desired result, or just buy a $3 bottle.

There was somewhere on here ( RCTech, not this thread) that had a link to a site that would tell you how to mix what with what to get a desired weight. Try google. Thats about all I can offer.
Jerm13 is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 05:22 AM
  #25571  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
DennisNyholm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 489
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jerm13
Ish... math wise yes, viscosity wise not so easy. You can try it and see if you like the desired result, or just buy a $3 bottle.

There was somewhere on here ( RCTech, not this thread) that had a link to a site that would tell you how to mix what with what to get a desired weight. Try google. Thats about all I can offer.
Thanks. Actually found the site and it says 52:48, so very close to 50:50. I couldn't find 27.5 in stock which is what got me to thinking.
DennisNyholm is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 05:45 AM
  #25572  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 132
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Are you supposed to grease the dog bones on the diff side? The manual didn't mention it. Seems like some lube would be beneficial but I could also see it attracting dirt and causing a problem.
Gearhead82 is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 06:00 AM
  #25573  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (112)
 
thecman26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 8,269
Trader Rating: 112 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Gearhead82
Are you supposed to grease the dog bones on the diff side? The manual didn't mention it. Seems like some lube would be beneficial but I could also see it attracting dirt and causing a problem.
Not necessary as it will attract dirt. Should spin freely without any lube.
thecman26 is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 06:32 AM
  #25574  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Gearhead82
Are you supposed to grease the dog bones on the diff side? The manual didn't mention it. Seems like some lube would be beneficial but I could also see it attracting dirt and causing a problem.
Some people use wax chain lube, as it does not attract dirt.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 07:15 AM
  #25575  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sellersville PA
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by Just2much19
I would definitely go with a shorty. If you happen to go with a low rider trans it will work with that as well. Also with the shorty you can position it forward to improve weight distribution as well as being lighter. Many companies have them cheap including SMC, dinogylipos and plenty more.

Thanks, I ordered a couple from SMC yesterday
JP187 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.