Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread >

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree137Likes

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 04-22-2024, 12:09 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: RCBuddha
Quick link to the front page

First Page

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2014, 09:12 PM
  #11266  
Suspended
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by bambambennett
One of my close friends during my high school years(88-92,I know "old guy") was raised by Mike Reedy. I didnt know how to set up a car, at all.LOL. Mike took care of all of us (friends with his "son") with motor help and car tuning( he was actually a pretty good onroad racer). If the car looked outa whack, he told us "try this there". We started with pins and ribs, moved to Losi X patterns, and finally ended up with micro pins(fuzzies). I don't think car setup was as crucial back then because the cars tended to slide around since the tracks were rototilled soil rather than concrete hard packed clay. Anytime a motor seemed to lose steam, he would fix it and we would be going fast again. I started with stock 27 turn and moved onto mod about a year into it. My preference was a 17 turn triple for my RC10 and a 13turn triple for my Yokomo(which I wish I still had). Good times back then. A few of us used to ride our bicycles from Westminster to Costa Mesa (about 10 miles or so) to go to the track(RCHR) if nobody was around to drive us. Dedicated!LOL
Good ol DW "Go Raiders"
PFKAOG is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 09:21 PM
  #11267  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
gticlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,105
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by bambambennett
One of my close friends during my high school years(88-92,I know "old guy") was raised by Mike Reedy. I didnt know how to set up a car, at all.LOL. Mike took care of all of us (friends with his "son") with motor help and car tuning( he was actually a pretty good onroad racer). If the car looked outa whack, he told us "try this there". We started with pins and ribs, moved to Losi X patterns, and finally ended up with micro pins(fuzzies). I don't think car setup was as crucial back then because the cars tended to slide around since the tracks were rototilled soil rather than concrete hard packed clay. Anytime a motor seemed to lose steam, he would fix it and we would be going fast again. I started with stock 27 turn and moved onto mod about a year into it. My preference was a 17 turn triple for my RC10 and a 13turn triple for my Yokomo(which I wish I still had). Good times back then. A few of us used to ride our bicycles from Westminster to Costa Mesa (about 10 miles or so) to go to the track(RCHR) if nobody was around to drive us. Dedicated!LOL
Do you mean Darrin?
gticlay is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 09:24 PM
  #11268  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
gticlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,105
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
You will need the studs also. The ball is a different diameter
Are you doing the HD cups the 22SCT and 22-4 use? They are absolutely fantastic and if you use one of those punches to make holes in them, they are also easy to install/remove just like the AE ones. I might switch later as well. For now, my Lunsford turnbuckles and OEM rod ends are free and smooth.
gticlay is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 10:11 PM
  #11269  
Tech Legend
 
Wild Cherry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: TRCR Modified Driver
Posts: 22,595
Default

Gti you got it all ready ..(best ball cup).


Not sure what arm's your useN, think plastic rear may be good for U. I'm using hard.

try 2.5/1 & outside on the rear chassis camber..

My ride is very good for the grip tommorow..
My 44 too.

Oyeah , he runs the wheeler like every day ...

44 driving good tonight ,good time...
.
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 10:23 PM
  #11270  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Cridd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 1,948
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Any weight difference between lunsford balls and AE kit balls?
Cridd is offline  
Old 06-19-2014, 11:30 PM
  #11271  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (7)
 
RcOldskool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 104
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

My coworker is a New Design Engineer and CNC programmer for our huge CNC's. We did a Solidworks FEA Stress analysis on the B5M chassis to see how we can remove weight without affecting rigidity. The "spiderweb" design is used to retain its "factory" stiffness indicated in dark blue in the first pic below. The lighter shades are somewhat weaker areas. Without the spiderwebs we started to see green to yellow areas which noticeably have more flex under load so in order to reduce weight and keep it within light blue to dark, we had to add the ribs. We weren't concerned about the lighter shades not dark blue because once the plastic parts were assembled and installed, the chassis was re-enforced to no flex at all. The last pic is the final product with plastic frames attached. Mill time is 39 minutes a chassis at .073" depth. Factory mill is .050". Chassis is .105" total so there's .032" left at bottom of mill holes. Effective weight loss of 30 grams on the money and still stiff as stock. The power of solidworks at its best when used to its potential. PM me for info on getting it done for your chassis.












Last edited by RcOldskool; 06-20-2014 at 10:32 AM.
RcOldskool is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 02:46 AM
  #11272  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (112)
 
thecman26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 8,269
Trader Rating: 112 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
I ran my MM car around the oval last weekend for giggles. So much better than a RM car on the oval.

I checked the pins, they are fine. Some of the bind is in the arms. I have noticed that my hard arms are way more free than the plastic ones. But you can feel the binding in the cups. I showed another driver and his eye widened in amazement at how tight they are. My RM car the cups are pretty free, but i spent time amount of time getting them that way. I probably can make them better with some effort polishing, it just pisses me off that I need to work so hard on the balls. I just picked up some lunsfords and I will be replacing all of the caps. I will probably take the time to polish the balls also, meh.
Man that sucks, I didn't spend any time at all to get mine nice and smooth on either my RM or MM. The fronts on both did bind a bit until I figured out the hinge pin trick (turned the hinge pin while pushing them in until they "clicked" in and then they where nice and free. Followed instructions for building except the addition of a tiny bit of black grease on the ball before assembly.
thecman26 is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 04:33 AM
  #11273  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Speed Freak RC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Braselton, Georgia
Posts: 708
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by kindnuguz
Aluminum + CC machine = FTW.... I got a AE aluminum shock cap and tried to thread the bleeder screw and was going real slow.. No matter what way I put the bleeder screw in it was not right.. Ended up trying to screw it in the best I could and guess what happen? It stopped before it was all the way in and the head stripped.. I was out a set of $16 shock caps..
If you bought the aluminum shock caps, they are probably for the B4.2 big bores, and those were not metric. They used a 2-56 bleeder screw, not a 2mm. Just FYI.
Speed Freak RC is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 05:45 AM
  #11274  
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,046
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

RcOldskool - now that is some impressive engineering!

Any chance you and/or your co-worker will be doing any more chassis' for customers?
HeavyD99 is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 06:27 AM
  #11275  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

my main concern with that milling is. Where does the esc and receiver go? I just dont see it sticking to that minimal flat surface. And I refuse to use shoe goo to hold my electronics in.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 06:31 AM
  #11276  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gticlay
Are you doing the HD cups the 22SCT and 22-4 use? They are absolutely fantastic and if you use one of those punches to make holes in them, they are also easy to install/remove just like the AE ones. I might switch later as well. For now, my Lunsford turnbuckles and OEM rod ends are free and smooth.
I am actually just going to use the AE cups and balls. I will just polish them and get them smooth enough that they dont greatly affect ride height adjustments. I worked the balls on my RM car and they are much better. My whole point was, they should come factory like the TLR ones. I should not have to go buy polish, make a chuck adapter and then spend an hour making then decent, but never as good as the tlr. I prefer to stay OEM on my cars. I have a bunch of new AE cups and balls. Plus my new shorter Lunsfords. So I will just built the camber links and do some finishing work on them.


I would love to see someone here use a new stud, a new cup, assemble with no prep work and show me your floppy camber links, like i showed in my video. Many of you tell me how free yours are. I would like to see. I doubt anyone has any as free as the TLR new out of the package.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 06:45 AM
  #11277  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (46)
 
lee_double2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 556
Trader Rating: 46 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by will5879
I use the #91446 (and #91447 of course) front and rear on mine and everything fits fine.
Thanks greatly
lee_double2000 is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 07:11 AM
  #11278  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (7)
 
RcOldskool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 104
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Its not a problem at all. My receiver and esc are still in the buggy and we have big jumps. We double up servo tape in the milled areas.

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
my main concern with that milling is. Where does the esc and receiver go? I just dont see it sticking to that minimal flat surface. And I refuse to use shoe goo to hold my electronics in.
RcOldskool is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 07:19 AM
  #11279  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
pumpkinfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Schwenksville, PA
Posts: 609
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
You will need the studs also. The ball is a different diameter
Do you have part numbers?
pumpkinfish is offline  
Old 06-20-2014, 07:54 AM
  #11280  
Tech Legend
 
Wild Cherry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: TRCR Modified Driver
Posts: 22,595
Default

Originally Posted by RcOldskool
[URL=http://s301.photobucket.com/user/rcoldskool/media/1.jpg.html
[/URL]









Very nice work, we have been trying to get more flex from the edge of the water fall to the back of servo ..

Whole idea is equalize the flex and make the front flex more equal to the rear
Wild Cherry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.