Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread >

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree136Likes

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 04-22-2024, 12:09 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: RCBuddha
Quick link to the front page

First Page

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2014, 12:39 PM
  #11791  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (52)
 
Cpt.America's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,085
Trader Rating: 52 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
No matter what anyone says, skinning the tire is way better then glueing back two half's of a tire back together again.
Make no mistake, no matter what anyone says, George Cherry's opinion is superior.
Cpt.America is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 12:42 PM
  #11792  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (515)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Antelope Valley, CA
Posts: 5,090
Trader Rating: 515 (100%+)
Default

There are some things you can do to save a ton of weight that are relatively inexpensive such as a lighter lipo. SMC has a 3500mah lipo. I bought a couple to try out. If they can keep the voltage up for 5-7 minutes it would help a lot.....they are not expensive at all, $86 shipped for a pair. I currently use their 70/140 C 4600 lipos and they are excellent....better than my peaks for sure.
QDRHRSE is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 12:52 PM
  #11793  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by QDRHRSE
There are some things you can do to save a ton of weight that are relatively inexpensive such as a lighter lipo. SMC has a 3500mah lipo. I bought a couple to try out. If they can keep the voltage up for 5-7 minutes it would help a lot.....they are not expensive at all, $86 shipped for a pair. I currently use their 70/140 C 4600 lipos and they are excellent....better than my peaks for sure.
yeah, I use the 4800mah ProMatach and they weight around 214 grams. A 150 gram lipo would be a HUGE weight loss. I am just not sure on them for 7-10 minute mains with warm up laps. My 4800 was fading around the 8 minute mark for one particular double after a 180. Once you start casing your rear wheels because your down on power, the whole race can be given away. I would try the light lipos as an "easy" weight loss, but I fear it is just not enough mah.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 01:28 PM
  #11794  
Tech Master
iTrader: (25)
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,350
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

My C4.2 was 1640 grams stock buggy and owned club nights lol.

But thank you Wildcat for the info.
chevmaro is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 01:31 PM
  #11795  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by chevmaro
My C4.2 was 1640 grams and owned club nights lol.

But thank you Wildcat for the info.
umm, ok. lol. I dont race on your track, so I cant say. I think you would be hard pressed to own 17.5 buggy here with a 1640g car though, lol. Keep in mind the 2 guys that took 1st and second at the top gun race, are local club racers, lol. 17.5 club racing is pretty stout here with often A to E mains on club nights.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 01:43 PM
  #11796  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (515)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Antelope Valley, CA
Posts: 5,090
Trader Rating: 515 (100%+)
Default

I don' think that there is a better platform between the two unless you start comparing surfaces. Putting that aside, where traction is available the extra weight of the MM car is easily compensated by the increase you get in corner speed. If you need more pop you can do a few things to get it out of a heavy car. You can gear a little lower and you can lock and/or eliminate your slipper. A tooth or two is not going to loose a race unless you have monster straights on your track.

On a majority of the tracks I have run lately people seem to like MM better. For a driver of my caliber it doesn't seem to matter. I'm building a RM SC6 just because its easier to tune and work on than the MM version I'm racing now. To me the MM car is more work....I guess I'm a follower and just go with the herd. I enjoy the racing experience either way.
QDRHRSE is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 01:52 PM
  #11797  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

yeah, I was planning to do just that next time I run the mm 17.5. Drop a few teeth and see if I can get the temps and "pop" right. Man, I like to mess around too much. On the current layout for the proline race this weekend, the MM might be the best. Its very flowing.... Maybe I will give it a go. I get 8 hours of practice on Friday, so I can do a few things . Now I am all MM motivated again, lol. I think I will pick up an alum top shaft on my way home, lol. grrr
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 02:09 PM
  #11798  
Tech Master
iTrader: (25)
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,350
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
umm, ok. lol. I dont race on your track, so I cant say. I think you would be hard pressed to own 17.5 buggy here with a 1640g car though, lol. Keep in mind the 2 guys that took 1st and second at the top gun race, are local club racers, lol. 17.5 club racing is pretty stout here with often A to E mains on club nights.
I race at the same track with the same 10 or so guys running stock buggy. We get a few new people here and there creating a B Main. smedium sized track. I will likely keep the RB6 for stock. Its been performing is light and fast and already setup for stock. Thinking I will pickup a B5M for mod though. Or maybe a serpent or maybe a 22 who knows. I'll goto my store and see what impulses I have at that moment.
chevmaro is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 02:16 PM
  #11799  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

dont get the 22 for mm. I have not tried the serpent MM, but the B5M is pretty good for mod. It feels more balanced than other MM cars I have tried. I thought I would struggle with bite, but I have not.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 05:07 PM
  #11800  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (515)
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Antelope Valley, CA
Posts: 5,090
Trader Rating: 515 (100%+)
Default

Try an Exotek slipper eliminator. It'll be $20 with an AE spur. It saves a lot weight, and rotating mass, right at the motor. Its a much bigger improvement then a topshaft. It also gives you a huge range of spurs down to 64, maybe lower. Your car will also run a tad cooler. I'll post a pic later. Its the best kept secret ever for stock.
QDRHRSE is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 08:08 PM
  #11801  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
BillPear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The O.C. 92646
Posts: 748
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

I stopped posting here a while ago due to the people that were to lazy to read/search the thread. Now with the volume of MISINFORMATION/OPINION that is posted as FACT, in regards to getting your B5m down to weight I feel I need to make on last, last post. First a few questions for the weight experts.

1. How much over the NASCAR minimum does Jimmy Johnsons car weigh WITHOUT ballast?

2. Same for Lewis Hamilton's F1 car? I guess more than Nico's since he's trailing in the points

3. How about those guys and there Tour De France bikes how much extra weight do they carry?

The answer to all three is NONE!

Finally if you think weight really doesn't matter, go ask your doctor how much extra weight you should carry.

If you want to know how to get to 1499g search out my previous posts in this thread it's all there, and doesn't cost that much. If you REALLY want to get light so you have ballasting options or want to run the FT Al parts PM me.

I wont waste the Experts (?) time responding to this thread again, nor will I be baited. I will continue to follow your ridiculous theories though, because My Teammates and I love a good laugh
BillPear is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 08:22 PM
  #11802  
Suspended
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by BillPear
I stopped posting here a while ago due to the people that were to lazy to read/search the thread. Now with the volume of MISINFORMATION/OPINION that is posted as FACT, in regards to getting your B5m down to weight I feel I need to make on last, last post. First a few questions for the weight experts.

1. How much over the NASCAR minimum does Jimmy Johnsons car weigh WITHOUT ballast?

2. Same for Lewis Hamilton's F1 car? I guess more than Nico's since he's trailing in the points

3. How about those guys and there Tour De France bikes how much extra weight do they carry?

The answer to all three is NONE!

Finally if you think weight really doesn't matter, go ask your doctor how much extra weight you should carry.

If you want to know how to get to 1499g search out my previous posts in this thread it's all there, and doesn't cost that much. If you REALLY want to get light so you have ballasting options or want to run the FT Al parts PM me.

I wont waste the Experts (?) time responding to this thread again, nor will I be baited. I will continue to follow your ridiculous theories though, because My Teammates and I love a good laugh
PFKAOG is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 09:13 PM
  #11803  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by BillPear
I stopped posting here a while ago due to the people that were to lazy to read/search the thread. Now with the volume of MISINFORMATION/OPINION that is posted as FACT, in regards to getting your B5m down to weight I feel I need to make on last, last post. First a few questions for the weight experts.

1. How much over the NASCAR minimum does Jimmy Johnsons car weigh WITHOUT ballast?

2. Same for Lewis Hamilton's F1 car? I guess more than Nico's since he's trailing in the points

3. How about those guys and there Tour De France bikes how much extra weight do they carry?

The answer to all three is NONE!

Finally if you think weight really doesn't matter, go ask your doctor how much extra weight you should carry.

If you want to know how to get to 1499g search out my previous posts in this thread it's all there, and doesn't cost that much. If you REALLY want to get light so you have ballasting options or want to run the FT Al parts PM me.

I wont waste the Experts (?) time responding to this thread again, nor will I be baited. I will continue to follow your ridiculous theories though, because My Teammates and I love a good laugh
I dont like a super light car, its my preference. I know a few people who went to 1499 and could not get the car planted. I am sure all of that could be tuning. Probably is. 99% of rctech are not expert tuners. That is just a fact. And non of the "pros" run super light stock cars. Hartson didnt even do that for jc stock nats. The shock packages that WC preaches and several other preach are for heaver mod cars. If you have a perfect high bite 1499 gram setup, please post it for all to share. No sarcasm, but that info is not not here. Most people post here and going super light dont have a clue and the fast locals are not always very forth coming. They are too busy discharging and charging packs at 40 amps, grind endbells for more timing and removing winds
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 09:20 PM
  #11804  
Suspended
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
I dont like a super light car, its my preference. I know a few people who went to 1499 and could not get the car planted. I am sure all of that could be tuning. Probably is. 99% of rctech are not expert tuners. That is just a fact. And non of the "pros" run super light stock cars. Hartson didnt even do that for jc stock nats. The shock packages that WC preaches and several other preach are for heaver mod cars. If you have a perfect high bite 1499 gram setup, please post it for all to share. No sarcasm, but that info is not not here. Most people post here and going super light dont have a clue and the fast locals are not always very forth coming. They are too busy discharging and charging packs at 40 amps, grind endbells for more timing and removing winds
WHo does that?
PFKAOG is offline  
Old 07-08-2014, 09:24 PM
  #11805  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,616
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

most guys I know just run 10.4 volts on their batteries
Bob Barry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.