Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
|
|||
#3286
Tech Elite
#3287
Tech Master
iTrader: (35)
Hideeho
I am the EXACT opposite. I REALLY don't like the cab forward design in general. I very much prefer the old school cab back designs. If FTW ever makes their blade body for the b5 I would be so all over that. http://www.avidrc.com/product/18/ftw...0022B-ftw.html
I also would love to have some spoked wheels for my buggy. Come on with the rulux with hexes JC!
I am the EXACT opposite. I REALLY don't like the cab forward design in general. I very much prefer the old school cab back designs. If FTW ever makes their blade body for the b5 I would be so all over that. http://www.avidrc.com/product/18/ftw...0022B-ftw.html
I also would love to have some spoked wheels for my buggy. Come on with the rulux with hexes JC!
#3289
i dont get why some people dont like the cab forward bodies. there are some put there that just appear out of proportion and odd, but the majority from the big companies look amazing. I find the old style bodies to be boring and have no defined shape. doeant matter, forward is here to stay which is awesome.
#3290
#3291
way off topic
Cab forward is faster then old fashion & obsolete rear cab shells.
Cab forward is faster then old fashion & obsolete rear cab shells.
#3292
#3295
#3296
#3299
Tech Elite
iTrader: (17)
Back to the B5 specifically, I'm interested to know how exactly this happened and more importantly, with the kit having just dropped (no pun intended), will associated replace this under warranty? I realize chassis can and do, over time, weaken and can break, but historically, it takes a great amount of punishment for one to break. This happening in the first weekend of running the car seems like the chassis was defective to begin with. e.i. bubble in the plastic or the chassis didn't endure the proper cooling time/cycle.