Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread >

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree137Likes

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 04-22-2024, 12:09 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: RCBuddha
Quick link to the front page

First Page

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2014, 07:44 PM
  #9736  
Tech Master
iTrader: (42)
 
Fabulous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: WI.
Posts: 1,160
Trader Rating: 42 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by splking1
Yes that is what every one is referring to. I wouldn't recommend removing it as its considered the front mount for your tranny.
Now I see. Thanks for sharing a pic to better understand. Any difference in handling?
Fabulous is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 08:02 PM
  #9737  
Tech Legend
 
Wild Cherry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: TRCR Modified Driver
Posts: 22,595
Default

Originally Posted by Jason Turner
Any pics of yours? I don't understand fully. Also i'm not a fan of reciever on the right anyone putting it up on a tray or something different?
use post #4321

Only difference is I grinded the battery box off and my thumb screws are separated from the brace. This was done to help bring more flex to chassis in front of waterfall.

BTW

Hey Mark ! Good work & well done on your inline.
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 08:12 PM
  #9738  
Tech Legend
 
Wild Cherry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: TRCR Modified Driver
Posts: 22,595
Default

Originally Posted by Fabulous
I'm confused ! I don't have a waterfall in my B5m unless your referring to the tranny brace? If so why not just remove the brace instead of cutting it.
For Trcr

Remove the waterfall or brace and the rear flex becomes excessive and adds to much traction with a lost of stability.

The car's stall is made stronger and becomes quite noticeable .

Whole reason for the inline to reduce the stall all mid motors battle.
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 08:22 PM
  #9739  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (32)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,653
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by splking1
Here is my inline setup. I went with the battery all the way back. Also i didnt cut out the battery box. I want to be able to switch back and forth to normal setup and inline setup to see what i like best.
Very nice. Double sided tape for battery? What did your car weigh this way?
racenut123 is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 08:26 PM
  #9740  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by racenut123
Very nice. Double sided tape for battery? What did your car way this way?
Thank you. No it still uses the battery strap. Just didn't have it on in the pic. As for weight not sure. Haven't weight with this set up.
splking1 is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 08:44 PM
  #9741  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 179
Default

Originally Posted by splking1
Here is my inline setup. I went with the battery all the way back. Also i didnt cut out the battery box. I want to be able to switch back and forth to normal setup and inline setup to see what i like best.
look at the CG of the battery. You might as well have left it stock. Havent changed anything.
slappomatt is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 08:53 PM
  #9742  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (32)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,653
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

If the focus is to get the weight over the rear then the battery back makes sense. Considering he runs the shorty servo and is able to get the electronics relatively inline as far as weight goes,how is this even similar to stock?

Explain this to me like I am 5 because I am obviously not seeing your point.
racenut123 is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 08:55 PM
  #9743  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by slappomatt
look at the CG of the battery. You might as well have left it stock. Havent changed anything.
Not even close to the same CG as I ran before. No were near stock
splking1 is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 09:06 PM
  #9744  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Fabulous
Now I see. Thanks for sharing a pic to better understand. Any difference in handling?
I'll be testing it tomorrow. Thanks Wild Cherry for sharing this mod.
splking1 is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 09:08 PM
  #9745  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (67)
 
Jake S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Erie PA
Posts: 4,833
Trader Rating: 67 (93%+)
Default

Originally Posted by racenut123
If the focus is to get the weight over the rear then the battery back makes sense. Considering he runs the shorty servo and is able to get the electronics relatively inline as far as weight goes,how is this even similar to stock?

Explain this to me like I am 5 because I am obviously not seeing your point.
i think he is saying that the center of mass of the battery looks similar to the stock back position, but with this you remove alot of "mass-roll" so the car doesnt dump in the center of the corner as much.
Jake S is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 09:11 PM
  #9746  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 149
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Jake S
i think he is saying that the center of mass of the battery looks similar to the stock back position, but with this you remove alot of "mass-roll" so the car doesnt dump in the center of the corner as much.
Yeah I see what he is saying. I ran by battery all the way forward so it won't be remotely the same. I found that to work best with the shorty packs that are 155 grams.
splking1 is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 09:12 PM
  #9747  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (32)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,653
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jake S
i think he is saying that the center of mass of the battery looks similar to the stock back position, but with this you remove alot of "mass-roll" so the car doesnt dump in the center of the corner as much.
This makes sense. The roll is what we are addressing by going inline correct?
racenut123 is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 09:31 PM
  #9748  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (67)
 
Jake S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Erie PA
Posts: 4,833
Trader Rating: 67 (93%+)
Default

Originally Posted by racenut123
This makes sense. The roll is what we are addressing by going inline correct?
i believe that is the main purpose. but looking at it a shorty is not much wider then the motor/trans anyway....
Jake S is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 09:32 PM
  #9749  
Tech Legend
 
Wild Cherry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: TRCR Modified Driver
Posts: 22,595
Default

Originally Posted by splking1
I'll be testing it tomorrow. Thanks Wild Cherry for sharing this mod.
my pleasure, make sure to check ride height before running.
Suggest 23.5mm front & rear.

Take the time to remove the battery tray & separate the thumb screws.
Its the fun part....lol

If you feel the need for more traction suggest green rear spring.

I'm running for shocks

Front
1.4 x 3 piston ,37.5w ,Grey front
Rear
1.6 x 2 , 32.4w, white spring
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 05-12-2014, 09:37 PM
  #9750  
Tech Legend
 
Wild Cherry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: TRCR Modified Driver
Posts: 22,595
Default

Oman !
Speaking bout shocks .....

Tomorrow testing Losi # 55 x 4 piston
35w front 30w rear..

I tell everyone want happens , can trust me..

Last edited by Wild Cherry; 05-12-2014 at 09:57 PM.
Wild Cherry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.