Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
|
|||
#8941
#8942
#8943
Suspended
Just ordered mine from racedayhobbies.com.
They had them in stock.
Hope I can get it ready for the first race at LRT.
Top step of the podium; here I come.
They had them in stock.
Hope I can get it ready for the first race at LRT.
Top step of the podium; here I come.
#8945
I have been reading a bunch and wanted to see the benefits of one platform over the other for Blinky 17.5 class racing. I hear weight is an issue with the MM. Possible overheating because of the extreme gearing required. Has anyone really done a real comparison? Gonna pull trigger on a kit this weekend and hoping to be steered in the right direction.
As to 17.5 specifically, there are plenty of proof points that for winning big races the B5R is quite capable. And I do think that if you are good enough to be winning or losing by 10th's you will want to invest in lightening certain aspects of both cars, but it's cheaper and easier to get the rear motor to fighting weight. Stock racers are modifying the B5M in ways strikingly similar to what we did with the C4.2 ... mostly it seems to get it lighter.
#8946
Quote:
Originally Posted by toddmanley View Post
Just got off the phone with AE...
On the rear motor B5 you want the "0*" etching facing backwards (opposite for the mid-motor). Time to swap things around.
Ugh...they called me back and told me otherwise. Apparently the etching needs to face the shock. So it will face forward on the rear-mount, backward on the mid-mount. Sorry for the confusion. They also shared the intent to get a quick document published online to show how the hub differences convert vis-a-vis the ball stud hole mounts and how that compares to the hub inserts on the plastic version.
#8948
Tech Adept
I run the stock and don't recommend using anytype of grease. I use bearing oil from avid racing.
#8950
#8951
Depends on your driving style and what you want out of the car. I like how I can throw around my B5R -- it's grip it and rip it. My 'money pit' C4.2 is just as fast, or perhaps faster, on our indoor clay track but I'm having more fun with the rear motor right now.
As to 17.5 specifically, there are plenty of proof points that for winning big races the B5R is quite capable. And I do think that if you are good enough to be winning or losing by 10th's you will want to invest in lightening certain aspects of both cars, but it's cheaper and easier to get the rear motor to fighting weight. Stock racers are modifying the B5M in ways strikingly similar to what we did with the C4.2 ... mostly it seems to get it lighter.
As to 17.5 specifically, there are plenty of proof points that for winning big races the B5R is quite capable. And I do think that if you are good enough to be winning or losing by 10th's you will want to invest in lightening certain aspects of both cars, but it's cheaper and easier to get the rear motor to fighting weight. Stock racers are modifying the B5M in ways strikingly similar to what we did with the C4.2 ... mostly it seems to get it lighter.
I am considering making a B5RM purchase, but I run mod at my track. Tried another competitors MM and just cannot get the drive/feel I think I like with it, which makes me think a RM B5 would be a better fit for me. Just curious which class you run with your B4RM.
Thanks,
JB
#8952
Tech Adept
I found this in the B5 thread. Not sure how accurate but may give you some new input:
Quote:
Originally Posted by toddmanley View Post
Just got off the phone with AE...
On the rear motor B5 you want the "0*" etching facing backwards (opposite for the mid-motor). Time to swap things around.
Ugh...they called me back and told me otherwise. Apparently the etching needs to face the shock. So it will face forward on the rear-mount, backward on the mid-mount. Sorry for the confusion. They also shared the intent to get a quick document published online to show how the hub differences convert vis-a-vis the ball stud hole mounts and how that compares to the hub inserts on the plastic version.
Quote:
Originally Posted by toddmanley View Post
Just got off the phone with AE...
On the rear motor B5 you want the "0*" etching facing backwards (opposite for the mid-motor). Time to swap things around.
Ugh...they called me back and told me otherwise. Apparently the etching needs to face the shock. So it will face forward on the rear-mount, backward on the mid-mount. Sorry for the confusion. They also shared the intent to get a quick document published online to show how the hub differences convert vis-a-vis the ball stud hole mounts and how that compares to the hub inserts on the plastic version.
#8953
Tech Regular
I prefer my B5RM's compared to all the different B5M's I have driven. Their set up is good, just not to my driving style. Weird how I prefer a MM22 but a RM B5.
#8954
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
And to be clear, you put that little washer in between the two bearings on the rack. It's just like the crush washer that goes between the bearings in the front steering blocks.
#8955
Tech Elite
iTrader: (32)
Depends on your driving style and what you want out of the car. I like how I can throw around my B5R -- it's grip it and rip it. My 'money pit' C4.2 is just as fast, or perhaps faster, on our indoor clay track but I'm having more fun with the rear motor right now.
As to 17.5 specifically, there are plenty of proof points that for winning big races the B5R is quite capable. And I do think that if you are good enough to be winning or losing by 10th's you will want to invest in lightening certain aspects of both cars, but it's cheaper and easier to get the rear motor to fighting weight. Stock racers are modifying the B5M in ways strikingly similar to what we did with the C4.2 ... mostly it seems to get it lighter.
As to 17.5 specifically, there are plenty of proof points that for winning big races the B5R is quite capable. And I do think that if you are good enough to be winning or losing by 10th's you will want to invest in lightening certain aspects of both cars, but it's cheaper and easier to get the rear motor to fighting weight. Stock racers are modifying the B5M in ways strikingly similar to what we did with the C4.2 ... mostly it seems to get it lighter.
I have a more finesse driving style. Not a throw the car guy. Actually I agree after driving the RM today it is very nice and certainly competitive/fast in 17.5. I also watched a very fast spec racer put the coals to everyone in 17.5 with a mid motor b5 last night. Car was smooth yet aggressive enough to put it anywhere. He did relieve some of the weight in his drivetrain with the MIP pucks and top shaft. The car sold me that a mid motor will be fine.