Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread >

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree136Likes

Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 04-22-2024, 12:09 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: RCBuddha
Quick link to the front page

First Page

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2013, 08:34 PM
  #361  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,162
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Sorry for the drama guys, should have just put the iPad down.
DG Designs is offline  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:42 PM
  #362  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 656
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JDM_DOHC_SiR
Don't think that will work too well since the B4 AVID shaft is machined for a Standard size bearing
GOOD POINT!!!! completely forgot! but i better order me a second avid slipper
xTotalghost is offline  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:43 PM
  #363  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Adamska27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The land of cheese and beer
Posts: 919
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

It specifically lists all metric on the rm, but seems to be missing in the mm specs
If this car is all metric I'll buy it
Adamska27 is offline  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:54 PM
  #364  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 430
Default

Originally Posted by Adamska27
It specifically lists all metric on the rm, but seems to be missing in the mm specs
If this car is all metric I'll buy it
They'll both be metric
lee111m is offline  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:13 PM
  #365  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5
Default General B5 Information

Shocks: The new shocks have been updated in a few different areas. The cap is now plastic but still has a bleeder screw for easy bleeding. The shock body now has a smoother surface finish to help reduce friction with the piston. New shock internal gland spacers are also included with help reduce friction and make for smoother shock operation. An updated e-clip has also been used to make the piston more secure.

Drivetrain: The CVA is now captured by the bearing so that the cva pin can not be lost during operation. To increase the life span of the outdrive and cva bone, the pin diameter has been made larger to increase contact area.

Front A-Arms: The decision to have straight arms on the B5 and gull wing arms on the B5M was made to better suit the performance demands of each car type. Both types of arms will fit both cars so this can be used as an additional tuning option if desired.
Kody Numedahl is offline  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:19 PM
  #366  
Suspended
iTrader: (12)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Kody Numedahl
Shocks: The new shocks have been updated in a few different areas. The cap is now plastic but still has a bleeder screw for easy bleeding. The shock body now has a smoother surface finish to help reduce friction with the piston. New shock internal gland spacers are also included with help reduce friction and make for smoother shock operation. An updated e-clip has also been used to make the piston more secure.

Drivetrain: The CVA is now captured by the bearing so that the cva pin can not be lost during operation. To increase the life span of the outdrive and cva bone, the pin diameter has been made larger to increase contact area.

Front A-Arms: The decision to have straight arms on the B5 and gull wing arms on the B5M was made to better suit the performance demands of each car type. Both types of arms will fit both cars so this can be used as an additional tuning option if desired.
Will kits be available at the Reedy race for purchase?
PFKAOG is offline  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:45 PM
  #367  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Cridd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 1,948
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Nope
Cridd is offline  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:57 PM
  #368  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
Davidka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,883
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DG Designs
You do realize a TC weighs over a pound less right?

ROAR minimum weights:
1/10 Rubber T/C=1525gm
1/10 2wd off road buggy=1499gm
Davidka is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 12:46 AM
  #369  
AE-Reedy
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 786
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Davidka
ROAR minimum weights:
1/10 Rubber T/C=1525gm
1/10 2wd off road buggy=1499gm
1/10 Rubber T/C=1380gm
Sean Cochran is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 04:14 AM
  #370  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
Jmuck69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA.
Posts: 5,061
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by wrightcs77
I would think with how far into production everything is and with shipping times from overseas, the chassis is already finalized. It takes a lot more time than people think for production to be scheduled, run, packed and shipped.
I was kidding.
Jmuck69 is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 05:26 AM
  #371  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
Davidka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,883
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DG Designs
You do realize a TC weighs over a pound less right?
Originally Posted by Sean Cochran
1/10 Rubber T/C=1380gm
You're right, haven't been on the rug since the revision.

Still, less than 1/2 lb difference. Just a tick over 1/4lb actually.

Given the difference in grip and power I would believe that TC would be harder on out drives/pins than 2wd buggy in a relatively clean environment.
Davidka is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 05:31 AM
  #372  
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: El Mirage, AZ, USA
Posts: 1,474
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jmuck69
The bottom of the chassis is still being developed but the top is complete. Thats why AE has only shown some of the top up until now
This has GOT to be the stupidest reply I have ever heard on this site.
Bubonic-X is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 05:49 AM
  #373  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
The Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 494
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Bubonic-X
This has GOT to be the stupidest reply I have ever heard on this site.
Hmm I thought it was one of the best. Funny how many people on RC tech don't know what sarcasm is.
The Rev is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 06:26 AM
  #374  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: My house.
Posts: 3,569
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Alright guys, you want to know why gull-wing arms on the MM then here it goes:
Shock angle progressiveness. Arm shock mounts like the OG RC8 and the T4 produce a softer shock the more it is compressed, OTH the lower the shock mount relative to arm the harder the shock gets the more it is compressed. That's why the MM gets a "stiffer" front shock geometry by design than the RM variety.

Last edited by 30Tooth; 01-01-2014 at 01:54 PM. Reason: Thank you Jmuck :)
30Tooth is offline  
Old 12-31-2013, 06:47 AM
  #375  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 431
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default Ignore

Dup

Last edited by 34x17; 12-31-2013 at 07:07 AM. Reason: Duplicate post
34x17 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.