Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
|
|||
#286
Tech Elite
iTrader: (110)
Other battery companies are already on the square. Im sure many other will follow suit.
http://www.smc-racing.net/index.php?...product_id=123
http://www.smc-racing.net/index.php?...product_id=123
#287
For those wondering about the blades/pucks durability, they are widely used on touring cars which are constantly at high speeds so they will stand up to the stress just fine.
Last edited by rcboy1; 12-30-2013 at 03:13 PM. Reason: phones suck
#289
Ha this is a funny statement cause this is the ELECTRIC offroad forum, people are here because they choose not to waste money on nitro
#290
#291
Well I'm just saying if you get into nitro then you probably understand the costs associated with expensive motors and having to buy fuel. That doesn't make me feel any better about spending $100+ on a lipo, I get by with my "cheap" lipos thanks
#292
In no way am I disputing the durability of the Puck system, just pointing out that simply because something works in on road does not mean it will automatically work in off road.
#293
Other battery companies are already on the square. Im sure many other will follow suit.
http://www.smc-racing.net/index.php?...product_id=123
http://www.smc-racing.net/index.php?...product_id=123
#295
#296
This comparison doesn't really work. On road cars, while they do generally run hotter motors, do not jump and are not subjected to the shock loads that off road produces. And in on road, throttle modulation is generally smoother anyway.
In no way am I disputing the durability of the Puck system, just pointing out that simply because something works in on road does not mean it will automatically work in off road.
In no way am I disputing the durability of the Puck system, just pointing out that simply because something works in on road does not mean it will automatically work in off road.
#297
Just saw on smc face book. They will be making square packs
#298
#299
#300