Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy >

Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree66Likes

Hot Bodies D413 1/10 4WD Buggy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2014, 07:41 AM
  #2641  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
skrichter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 894
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by yzracer758
JP Edition #001 & #002 4-Pole Setup(On the Left)

Curious what these are weighing at with graphite chassis and shorty lipo.

Wonder why Torrence didn't go with an Aluminum chassis (like most others).

Last edited by skrichter; 05-16-2014 at 11:25 AM.
skrichter is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 08:38 AM
  #2642  
Tech Master
iTrader: (18)
 
boudin4evr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,943
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by T. Deguzman
all this talk about purple stuff... how 'bout JP get some BROWN dirt on those things!
YES! and post setups for outdoor low traction and indoor clay medium traction!
boudin4evr is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 08:47 AM
  #2643  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 796
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by boudin4evr
YES! and post setups for outdoor low traction and indoor clay medium traction!
Posted one for clay medium traction on the last page.

http://www.petitrc.com/setup/hotbodi...ies2014050507/
AlderBoy is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 09:00 AM
  #2644  
mes
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,048
Default

Originally Posted by skrichter
Curious what these are weighing at with graphite chassis and shorty lipo.

Wonder why Torrence did go with an Aluminum chassis (like most others).
One of the reasons for cf might be that it will return to its original shape after hitting stuff. Even the most durable car will be useless with a bent chassis.
mes is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 09:13 AM
  #2645  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: In a VAN down by the RIVER
Posts: 805
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by skrichter
Curious what these are weighing at with graphite chassis and shorty lipo.

Wonder why Torrence did go with an Aluminum chassis (like most others).
around 1750 g.
Sofa King is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 09:14 AM
  #2646  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norcal
Posts: 789
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mes
One of the reasons for cf might be that it will return to its original shape after hitting stuff. Even the most durable car will be useless with a bent chassis.
Aluminum chassis is:
Half the price. (Most likely Less than half)
Not afraid of outdoor rough track, fine with scratch or peel off.
More flex ( stock thin upper deck will be in danger).
Work as a heat sink(10-20F motor temp difference in Durango)

And what are the chance bending ur aluminum chassis?
nicholasxuu is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 09:47 AM
  #2647  
mes
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,048
Default

Originally Posted by nicholasxuu
Aluminum chassis is:
Half the price. (Most likely Less than half)
Not afraid of outdoor rough track, fine with scratch or peel off.
More flex ( stock thin upper deck will be in danger).
Work as a heat sink(10-20F motor temp difference in Durango)

And what are the chance bending ur aluminum chassis?
If it is more flexible than a cf chassis, chances of bending it are there if you hit something hard enough. Also, there have been issues with bent aluminum chassis plates out of the box (iirc members of our club had issues withTeam Durango and TLR chassis plates, which were replaced without any problems)
I don't think most racers will have issues with their aluminum chassis plates, but some may have. Billy Easton chose a plastic chassis over aluminum for the Serpent Spyder and stated the possibility of bending as one of the reasons.
mes is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 10:04 AM
  #2648  
Tech Addict
 
Mopar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santee, Ca
Posts: 670
Default

Originally Posted by skrichter
Curious what these are weighing at with graphite chassis and shorty lipo.

Wonder why Torrence did go with an Aluminum chassis (like most others).
Originally Posted by Sofa King
around 1750 g.
After adding a fan for the motor I'm at 1713g. Only lightening has been ti - turnbuckles. Oh, and alloy wheel nuts.
Mopar is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 10:19 AM
  #2649  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 28
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by nicholasxuu
Aluminum chassis is:
Half the price. (Most likely Less than half)
Not afraid of outdoor rough track, fine with scratch or peel off.
More flex ( stock thin upper deck will be in danger).
Work as a heat sink(10-20F motor temp difference in Durango)

And what are the chance bending ur aluminum chassis?
I bent my dex410 chassis by casing a quad jump. Car never drove the same even after I tried straightening it and wasn't cheap to replace. My temps are lower on the d413 than my dex410 were. I've ran my trce slash (which is cf) all over the place. Bashing the crap out of it. The chassis on that looks cleaner than my sct410 which is a track only vehicle. Cf or aluminum whatever they both have advantages and disadvantages. Cf looks dead sexy though.
Bluect9a is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 02:33 PM
  #2650  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (68)
 
Jakesterama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Minnesota
Posts: 916
Trader Rating: 68 (100%+)
Default

I'm at 1666g
Jakesterama is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 02:42 PM
  #2651  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (146)
 
RC*PHREAK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,359
Trader Rating: 146 (100%+)
Default

minor gripes:

-for such a nice kit, not having some kind of clamping hex so the pins don't fall out seems like a miss.

-at the point the instructions tell you to put the body on, it is a PITA to get the nose piece on. you basically have to wedge and mash it in between the triangulated shock tower. good thing this is just going to be a practice body. hopefully the proline nose piece is a bit more narrow.

-the spring clip on the ends of the diff pinions are a pain to get on. torrence, what do these do?

Overall a real nice build. SOOO nice not having ANY parts come from a tree. As has been said the build is nicely laid out with parts bags that match instructions to the tee.

Can't wait to run it.
RC*PHREAK is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 02:51 PM
  #2652  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 796
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

-for such a nice kit, not having some kind of clamping hex so the pins don't fall out seems like a miss.

Agree! I just used Shoe Goo to keep the pins in, works like a charm!

-at the point the instructions tell you to put the body on, it is a PITA to get the nose piece on. you basically have to wedge and mash it in between the triangulated shock tower. good thing this is just going to be a practice body. hopefully the proline nose piece is a bit more narrow.

Agree! I just loosened the four shock tower assembly screws a bit and slipped it in no problem though.

-the spring clip on the ends of the diff pinions are a pain to get on. torrence, what do these do?

Keeps the bearing in place I believe.
AlderBoy is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 03:09 PM
  #2653  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastvale, CA
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by RC*PHREAK
minor gripes:

-for such a nice kit, not having some kind of clamping hex so the pins don't fall out seems like a miss.

-at the point the instructions tell you to put the body on, it is a PITA to get the nose piece on. you basically have to wedge and mash it in between the triangulated shock tower. good thing this is just going to be a practice body. hopefully the proline nose piece is a bit more narrow.

-the spring clip on the ends of the diff pinions are a pain to get on. torrence, what do these do?

Overall a real nice build. SOOO nice not having ANY parts come from a tree. As has been said the build is nicely laid out with parts bags that match instructions to the tee.

Can't wait to run it.
at the rear you can substitute the hex with a typical 12mm clamping hex off a touring car (with shorter pin). at the front the hex width is too thin to fit a clamping hex. do any other wheelers have a clamping hex up front? not sure why there's such a resistance against the grease method that I recommend.... it works, it's easy to remove, no need to wait for it to dry, it's lightweight, it's cheap, etc....

yeah the nose installation is pain. I have no excuse. but I thought it would have disrupted the 'flow' of the build if we put the nose on earlier in the build.

the spring clip prevents the input gear from jamming into the diff, which tightens the gear mesh. and it keeps the bearing from falling off.
T. Deguzman is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 03:19 PM
  #2654  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (146)
 
RC*PHREAK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,359
Trader Rating: 146 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by T. Deguzman
at the rear you can substitute the hex with a typical 12mm clamping hex off a touring car (with shorter pin). at the front the hex width is too thin to fit a clamping hex. do any other wheelers have a clamping hex up front? not sure why there's such a resistance against the grease method that I recommend.... it works, it's easy to remove, no need to wait for it to dry, it's lightweight, it's cheap, etc....

yeah the nose installation is pain. I have no excuse. but I thought it would have disrupted the 'flow' of the build if we put the nose on earlier in the build.

the spring clip prevents the input gear from jamming into the diff, which tightens the gear mesh. and it keeps the bearing from falling off.
can't the diff case housing capture both of the bearings and then maybe flange the end of the gear to keep it from going in? regardless, i still love the design of not having a separate gear and outdrive cup of some sort. the spring clip is only a minor irritation.
RC*PHREAK is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 03:30 PM
  #2655  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
kdeleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 429
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by T. Deguzman
at the rear you can substitute the hex with a typical 12mm clamping hex off a touring car (with shorter pin). at the front the hex width is too thin to fit a clamping hex. do any other wheelers have a clamping hex up front? not sure why there's such a resistance against the grease method that I recommend.... it works, it's easy to remove, no need to wait for it to dry, it's lightweight, it's cheap, etc....
.
You know, I didn't like the idea of not having a clamping hex at first. I looked through my many different ones that I had from TLR but none were right, I think all to wide. Anyway, so I tried the grease method and I have no issues. I still worry about it but so far, every time I've checked it, the pin has yet to start slipping out. Always staying nice and centered. So it seems to be working for me. I've had another car where the front pin is so tight it is almost impossible to remove. I much prefer this solution.
kdeleon is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.