Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Modern BEC rethink >

Modern BEC rethink

Modern BEC rethink

Old 05-13-2013, 06:20 PM
  #46  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
meno1103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 422
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dave H
Yeah, on the bench it's largely a DC system so it might not appear too bad. I'd be concerned under higher load conditions that there might be significant voltage differences on the ground.

But sounds like you are aware and checking, good stuff. Please update us if anything interesting comes of it.
Yes, I definitely think it would be a bad idea for those running high voltage packs, but for those having problems with 2s and a moderately strong servo (higher amp drain) it might be a temporary solution until they can find a better solution, such as one of the newer escs. I have been seeing higher voltage and amp ratings on various 1/8 scale esc, no doubt those changes will find their way to 1/10 scale soon. On my testing, I just hope to not experience any problems with higher amp loads, so I'll start with a single servo, then increase the amp load as I go.

Has anyone experienced an external bec failure where the bec did not damage other electronics? If so, what bec was it? It may be a better idea to change out the castle bec to one that does not run as high of a risk to other electronics.
meno1103 is offline  
Old 05-14-2013, 12:03 PM
  #47  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
turbo2cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: ID
Posts: 753
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

My experiences with my son's car(s) and my own car(s) is that the savox/spektrum brownouts are indeed caused by the receiver. My son and I both run SPektrum DX3C radios. He runs a savox 1268 servo, I run a 1258 servo. Originally we started out both running SR300 receivers...both of us had brown out issues. I used glitch busters on both cars...and that worked well for a while. Then I noticed that whenever flysky radio's were on at the track, we would have to re-bind our radios (that may be an entirely different issue alltogether...but I'm not convinced) that worked most of the time.

Well then I started reading online that it was an issue with the SR300 receiver, So I bought us some SR200 receivers. I initially installed them with no glitch buster on both cars, and all was well. The weird thing though...after a couple months of running that way, my car, developed a glitch. re-binding would cure it for the night, but it would come back the next day, the next race, 2-3 races later....it was really random...so I put the glitch buster back on my car (my son's car still not running one with the SR200)

So then I start reading about people running DSM2 receivers and reporting that the glitch issues were completely eliminated...So I run off and buy a couple knock-off SR3100's to test this. I'm blown away! Not only is the glitching 100% gone, but I notice a faster response, and I also notice that the LED on the reciever is MUCH brighter on the SR3100 (even side by side with an SR200)...

So In short...I'm not sure WHY i got the results that I did....but it is FOR SURE the receiver that is causing or producing the glitch/brownout.

Now, I'm not saying the servo doesn't influence things...because when I was glitching with my car, and my sons car didnt....I swapped our receivers (both were SR200's at that time) and the glitch stayed with my car.....I swapped receivers back....and swapped my 1258 servo for my son's 1268 servo....the glitch FOLLOWED my 1258 servo.

So I would say the servo for sure contributes to the problem....but the SOLUTION was to replace the SR200/SR300 DSM receiver for the SR3100 DSM2 receiver.

Take my info for what its worth....just trying to help people understand whats going on.
turbo2cam is offline  
Old 05-25-2013, 08:04 PM
  #48  
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 1,293
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dave H
Does your family have any of the non brush less Savox models that seem to be involved in most of the reported issues that perhaps you could measure and share?
It took a while to get her truck on the track, but here are the results from my wife's 22T with a Savox SC-1258TG powered by a Novak Havoc Pro SC X-Drive. The big gap is when I was taken out by another driver such that it popped out one of the power connectors to the ESC. After the graph is a vertically shot vid (she forgot that she can rotate her phone cam and have the video be correct) of me driving my wife's Mid-Motor 22T today.



+ YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.

Last edited by ufoDziner; 05-25-2013 at 09:20 PM. Reason: Added video
ufoDziner is offline  
Old 05-26-2013, 04:18 AM
  #49  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,342
Default

Originally Posted by ufoDziner
It took a while to get her truck on the track, but here are the results from my wife's 22T with a Savox SC-1258TG powered by a Novak Havoc Pro SC X-Drive. The big gap is when I was taken out by another driver such that it popped out one of the power connectors to the ESC. After the graph is a vertically shot vid (she forgot that she can rotate her phone cam and have the video be correct) of me driving my wife's Mid-Motor 22T today.
Very interesting, if not somewhat perplexing. While there is a significant difference, it doesn't appear to match up with some of the other reported (but not as clearly documented) measurements. Wonder if there is any chance Savox has updated the servos, or have you had the servo in question for a while?

Can you export the data? I have data analysis software I use for full scale acquisition, nCode GyphWorks. If you were able to acquire comparable data with say a Futaba BLS servo it might be interesting to find out if I can see anything, say with a frequency spectrum check (or do you have that capability?)

In any event many thanks for your efforts in taking and sharing the data.
Dave H is offline  
Old 05-26-2013, 09:01 AM
  #50  
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 1,293
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dave H
Very interesting, if not somewhat perplexing. While there is a significant difference, it doesn't appear to match up with some of the other reported (but not as clearly documented) measurements. Wonder if there is any chance Savox has updated the servos, or have you had the servo in question for a while?
I agree. What I didn't expect is for the draw to be lower than my 2271SG. The 2271 is touted as efficient and low draw, and while it might be, it's more than the 1258TG. We've had the servo in my wife's truck for approx. 2yrs.

Originally Posted by Dave H
Can you export the data? I have data analysis software I use for full scale acquisition, nCode GyphWorks. If you were able to acquire comparable data with say a Futaba BLS servo it might be interesting to find out if I can see anything, say with a frequency spectrum check (or do you have that capability?)

In any event many thanks for your efforts in taking and sharing the data.
I don't see anywhere in the software that allows export other than to Google Earth. I'm happy to send you the eagletree file(s) if you like. Unfortunately the only tools I have are the eagletree, and a multimeter. I posted an open ended offer to test servos that anyeone sends me, but have yet to receive any offers.
ufoDziner is offline  
Old 05-26-2013, 04:10 PM
  #51  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (6)
 
kufman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Elburn, IL
Posts: 3,658
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Badger5
In my Serpent 1/8th e buggy I had a Savox 1256 servo and Spektrum radio, powered through a RX8. This set up would cause the receiver to brown out just by moving the steering from full lock to full lock, I replaced the servo with a Futaba and the brown outs were gone. I have since changed to a Sanwa/Airtronics MT4 and never had a problem since.
So it would seem that a Savox servo can draw more than 5A to cause the BEC in the RX8 to struggle.
I actually think part of the problem here is the current carrying capability of the receiver, and hence my thinking that maybe it would be better to remove the receiver from this role and power the servo direct from the ESC. Having high fluctating currents in the same area as sensitive electronics that involve radio frequencies is surely asking for trouble. I suppose this shows how good modern receivers and radios are.
It isn't the average current that is the problem, it is the peak current which is hard to see with an Eagle tree system. When viewed on an o-scope, the peak current on a Savox servo is quite high, but the average is well below what the RX8 or the MMP are supposed to be able to supply. The ESC companies really need to work on their BEC's which can't supply nearly what they rate them for. I have dissected several ESC's and the chips used can put out 3A (for example) if they are at 25 degrees C. As you know, our ESC's are never at 25C and therefor that rating is rubbish. I don't see the receivers being the problem since I can't recall a nitro guy ever complaining about any servo causing a brown out.
kufman is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.