Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD >

TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1Likes

TLR 8IGHT E 3.0 THREAD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2014, 02:08 PM
  #1741  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
symmetricon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: houston
Posts: 4,882
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

I have owned and driven quite a few different e buggies and I have found the fastest lap per lap and easiest to drive cars have had a weight bias of 45~50% front 50~50% rear. The best two car I have driven have been a converted HB D812, and the Losi E 3.0. Interestingly, they have near identical weight distribution....

Last edited by symmetricon; 04-21-2014 at 02:11 PM. Reason: stupid auto spellchecker
symmetricon is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 02:37 PM
  #1742  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (198)
 
XXXDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida USA
Posts: 6,120
Trader Rating: 198 (100%+)
Cool

Originally Posted by XXXDad
Originally Posted by symmetricon
Except the suspension setup and 15° hubs.....
Originally Posted by pimpedaccord
Looks like a clutch too
Originally Posted by Tarimon
XXXDad is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 05:43 PM
  #1743  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 353
Default

I got a pair of white wheels will trade for yellow... PM if interested...
Whitey_Wangster is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 08:06 PM
  #1744  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Marble Falls, Texas
Posts: 528
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by XXXDad
that's interesting! I wonder what prompted that? I mean, I assume they tried that configuration in the R&D stages of the 3.0E? It prolly has a ton of steering with that set up?

Lol damn I hate chasing that stuff, but who knows, may knock off another second or two per lap like that. I would like to hear some reviews about this configuration.
motoclay is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 09:10 PM
  #1745  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (34)
 
Casper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orange, Ca
Posts: 17,869
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by motoclay
that's interesting! I wonder what prompted that? I mean, I assume they tried that configuration in the R&D stages of the 3.0E? It prolly has a ton of steering with that set up?

Lol damn I hate chasing that stuff, but who knows, may knock off another second or two per lap like that. I would like to hear some reviews about this configuration.
Yes they did test it and yes the kit configuration was determined to be the best setup with the battery and its locations where they are. Everyone has there own preferences and tries new things though.
Casper is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 10:15 PM
  #1746  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (8)
 
royvp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mb,Cdn
Posts: 104
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

I was looking at the picture and in my preseason rebuilds right now.it wouldn't be hard to move it forward.I was thinking it is done instead of using the brass weight.
royvp is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 10:44 PM
  #1747  
Tech Adept
 
Tarimon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 116
Default

Originally Posted by Casper
Yes they did test it and yes the kit configuration was determined to be the best setup with the battery and its locations where they are. Everyone has there own preferences and tries new things though.
Casper, what´s about the clutch system? Can you tell something about it? It is mentioned in the manual, that there sometime something could be...


.
Tarimon is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 04:14 AM
  #1748  
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester,IN
Posts: 1,384
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

We have ran against some of the 3.0's that swapped the the tray around and I didn't see any advantage except maybe the way it feels to the driver. We don't run brass weight either. Tried it and took it out. Tyler said it made car too heavy for the way he likes to drive.
RandyJones is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 05:31 AM
  #1749  
Tech Fanatic
 
Salkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 882
Default

These are listed as option parts on the TLR site:

http://www.tlracing.com/Products/Rel...s&SubCategory=

Are these not just "normal" gear box sets or? Why listed under "option parts"?
Salkin is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 08:48 AM
  #1750  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 192
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

For those who have had both the 3.0 nitro/electric conversion and the 3.0e how do they compare? I currently have a 3.0 nitro/electric conversion and am on the fence about buying the 3.0e.
R.M.S is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 09:09 AM
  #1751  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (208)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St Louis
Posts: 8,547
Trader Rating: 208 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by R.M.S
For those who have had both the 3.0 nitro/electric conversion and the 3.0e how do they compare? I currently have a 3.0 nitro/electric conversion and am on the fence about buying the 3.0e.
I have both and they are not the same. The nitro conversion is a better drive. The E-3.0 is very ridged and does not seem to handle the rough stuff as well.

I am all most tempted to get a nitro chassis and conversion for mine.
dodgeguy is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 09:28 AM
  #1752  
Tech Fanatic
 
Salkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 882
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeguy
I have both and they are not the same. The nitro conversion is a better drive. The E-3.0 is very ridged and does not seem to handle the rough stuff as well.

I am all most tempted to get a nitro chassis and conversion for mine.
Very strange

Could it not be, that the different configurations just suits different drivers? Just like changing other setup options?

Can't believe that TLR released a dedicated E buggy, that in general handles worse than a converted.

Maybe it suits you better and some other, but I go to believe that the E 3.0 overall is a better design.
Salkin is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 09:58 AM
  #1753  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (27)
 
symmetricon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: houston
Posts: 4,882
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

Some of you guys are reading into this far too much. Read through the whole thread and you will see that when the dedicated E buggy came out most preferred it over than the nitro converted version. There us nothing wrong with the buggy in its current stock configuration. Didn't Phend win the ROAR 2013 Nationals with it........
symmetricon is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 10:16 AM
  #1754  
Tech Fanatic
 
Salkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 882
Default

Originally Posted by symmetricon
Some of you guys are reading into this far too much. Read through the whole thread and you will see that when the dedicated E buggy came out most preferred it over than the nitro converted version. There us nothing wrong with the buggy in its current stock configuration. Didn't Phend win the ROAR 2013 Nationals with it........
Yes, you're right
Salkin is offline  
Old 04-22-2014, 12:44 PM
  #1755  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Africa, Durban
Posts: 312
Default

the E is definitely better for me, I can't see what the old nitro conversion did that the new E can't do better...
akshayp14 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.