R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road

Like Tree52Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2013, 06:24 PM   #1801
Tech Elite
 
goehm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,744
Trader Rating: 44 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rraden View Post
Thanks, that's what the clay setup shows, 3 deg per side! See attached picture. Maybe my measurement system is flawed. But standing the car on end and measuring the angle of the rear wheels should be close. I'll find a setup system and check it there.
It doesn't show that, you're misinterpreting their setup sheets. It shows 3 degrees total toe. It shows one portion of the car for each setting, and the toe settings are for the culmination of both sides.

Otherwise, you'd see cases where people are running 2 degrees front toe out and 6 degrees rear toe in. That'd be a disaster!
__________________
--GO!
Come visit G's RC Raceway / Shippensburg, PA / www.GSRC.us
goehm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 08:14 PM   #1802
Tech Elite
 
t0p_sh0tta's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,863
Trader Rating: 35 (100%+)
Default

This one is for 07Forester (and anyone else who made the switch), why the switch from the 44.2 to the Xray? Any regrets? How's the handling? Is it aggressive like the 44, or more laid back like the Kyosho?
__________________
I've met some of the strangest people while playing with my toy cars...
t0p_sh0tta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 08:26 PM   #1803
Tech Adept
 
caguilar4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goehm View Post
It doesn't show that, you're misinterpreting their setup sheets. It shows 3 degrees total toe. It shows one portion of the car for each setting, and the toe settings are for the culmination of both sides.

Otherwise, you'd see cases where people are running 2 degrees front toe out and 6 degrees rear toe in. That'd be a disaster!
Well, I just finished building my kit, and have the eccentric bushings in the center, as showed on the setup sheet, then slapped my car into my Hudy 10th scale offroad setup station. It reads 3* of toe ON EACH SIDE. As far as I know, there is no other way to set rear toe other than using the eccentric bushings.

So I guess we ARE running 6* total toe in the rear for all of us running the clay setup from Xray....
__________________
RB6 | XB4 | SC10.2 | MBX6 | RC8.2e
caguilar4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 08:38 PM   #1804
Tech Addict
 
Arigato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 'Vegas Baby!
Posts: 631
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t0p_sh0tta View Post
This one is for 07Forester (and anyone else who made the switch), why the switch from the 44.2 to the Xray? Any regrets? How's the handling? Is it aggressive like the 44, or more laid back like the Kyosho?
Since July, I've built and raced a B44.1 and a B44.2 when they came out. Last week I built an XB4 and raced it on Sunday. The build quality was absolutely the best of the 25 or so kits I've built in the last 4 years. I raced my B44.2 on Friday night and the XB4 on Sunday. I was able to run fast laps with both of them. However, I was able to run more consistent fast laps with the XRay. It's less twitchy yet rewards agressive driving. On the surface the kit looks like a B44 imitation but once you build it, you'll see the difference.
__________________
Dog House Racing
XRay XB8E
XRay XB4
XRay XB2
XRay T4'17

Last edited by Arigato; 03-11-2013 at 09:02 PM.
Arigato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 08:59 PM   #1805
Tech Addict
 
RShockley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 529
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arigato View Post
Since July, I've built and raced a B44.1 and a B44.2 when they came out. Last week I built an XB4 and raced it on Sunday. The build quality was absolutely the best of the 25 or so kits I've built in the last 4 years. I raced my B44.2 on Friday night and the XB4 on Sunday. I was able to run fast laps with both of them. However, I was able to run more consistent fast laps with the XRay. It's less twitchy yet rewards agressive driving. On the surface, the kit looks like a B44 imitation, once you build it, you'll see the difference.
What he said!
__________________
Richard Shockley
Kyosho RB6 / Kyosho RT5
Mike's Hobby Shop......Carrollton, TX
Kalgard / Epic Cameras / SMX Optics / Heavenly Hobbies
RShockley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 09:17 PM   #1806
Tech Master
 
Z00M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,173
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goehm View Post
It doesn't show that, you're misinterpreting their setup sheets. It shows 3 degrees total toe. It shows one portion of the car for each setting, and the toe settings are for the culmination of both sides.

Otherwise, you'd see cases where people are running 2 degrees front toe out and 6 degrees rear toe in. That'd be a disaster!
That's not correct. It is per side on the setup sheet. Almost all cars out there have 3degrees of toe in PER SIDE as a starting point. The setup sheet shows 1 half of each end. You do the same things to both sides of that end. If it says 3 degrees you have 3 degrees per side. The shock oil is only mentioned once - do you split it in half to fill each shock?
__________________
My blog: http://mikesrc.wordpress.com
XRAY XB4
## NOSRAM ## XRAY ## KO ##
www.nbhc.com.au - www.teamxray.com
Z00M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 09:47 PM   #1807
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 266
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z00M View Post
That's not correct. It is per side on the setup sheet. Almost all cars out there have 3degrees of toe in PER SIDE as a starting point. The setup sheet shows 1 half of each end. You do the same things to both sides of that end. If it says 3 degrees you have 3 degrees per side. The shock oil is only mentioned once - do you split it in half to fill each shock?
+1 Toe is in relation to a straight line drawn parallel to chassis center line ...per side.
Tijuana_Taxi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 10:13 PM   #1808
Tech Master
 
07Forester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Yorkville, IL
Posts: 1,534
Trader Rating: 10 (92%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t0p_sh0tta View Post
This one is for 07Forester (and anyone else who made the switch), why the switch from the 44.2 to the Xray? Any regrets? How's the handling? Is it aggressive like the 44, or more laid back like the Kyosho?
To get it out of the way....i'm an associated lover 'til death.

With that said, I talked with a few drivers from xray who know how I like a car to drive. They told me to give it a shot, so I did.

I can tell you I was never this happy with a car and the way it drives.

It's forgiving, super predictable, and easy to drive hard.

Truthfully the only "con" this car has is the cost of parts. Which is to be expected from Xray cars.

I'll also say, anyone who's gotten a-hold of my controller who owns any other brand 4wd buggy says they wish it was their own.
__________________
Speed Passion USA - speedpassion.net
Team Associated Factory Team Cars
B4.2| SC10 | SC10 4X4 | T4.2 | TC 6.1 WC | RC8.2E
Xray [XB4]
Leisure Hours Raceway/RC-Raceway/Trackside/HobbyTown LITH
07Forester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 10:22 PM   #1809
Tech Master
 
Troy Mckune's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,689
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arigato View Post
Since July, I've built and raced a B44.1 and a B44.2 when they came out. Last week I built an XB4 and raced it on Sunday. The build quality was absolutely the best of the 25 or so kits I've built in the last 4 years. I raced my B44.2 on Friday night and the XB4 on Sunday. I was able to run fast laps with both of them. However, I was able to run more consistent fast laps with the XRay. It's less twitchy yet rewards agressive driving. On the surface the kit looks like a B44 imitation but once you build it, you'll see the difference.
+1

I just switched from a B44.1. I have had two full days on the XB4 including one race. Hot lap so far is the same with both cars but I shaved 14 seconds in qualifying. The car is way easier to be consistent and fast. It is much more forgiving. I have only started to play around with setup so I know there is even better results to come.

As far as quality the XB4 is amazing. I have built many cars, buggies, etc and the Xray XB4, Xray T4, and NT1 are by far the best. I was actually surprised when it came out at $450 retail. At around $420 street price it's a bargain.

Durability: Having read most of this thread I thought I may run into some problems. I have landed this thing sideways, hit the wall off a triple, cartwheeled down the straight, been hit by many shortcourse trucks, and been hit head on by another 4W coming off a jump. So far in about 15+ runs I have broke a front bumper, completely my fault. My B44.1 was averaging a broken front arm and shock cap about every other race day (2-3 times a month).

You will not be disappointed.


P.S. B44.1 soon to be for sale cheap.
__________________
Mckune Design / facebook page / RC America / XRAY / Lunsford Racing
Mckune Design is a custom manufacturer of CNC machined carbon fiber, G10, & composite laminate parts for RC, Aerospace, medical, and high tech industries.
Troy Mckune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 07:08 AM   #1810
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 456
Default

Many moved from the Kyosho fold and give feedback?
__________________
Schumacher - RW Racing - RudeBits - TORCH
mikeyscott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 06:08 PM   #1811
Tech Elite
 
goehm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,744
Trader Rating: 44 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by caguilar4 View Post
Well, I just finished building my kit, and have the eccentric bushings in the center, as showed on the setup sheet, then slapped my car into my Hudy 10th scale offroad setup station. It reads 3* of toe ON EACH SIDE. As far as I know, there is no other way to set rear toe other than using the eccentric bushings.

So I guess we ARE running 6* total toe in the rear for all of us running the clay setup from Xray....
Wow - that's helpful. I was completely wrong and this'll help me get it straight when I start building the kit tomorrow!
__________________
--GO!
Come visit G's RC Raceway / Shippensburg, PA / www.GSRC.us
goehm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 06:27 PM   #1812
Tech Elite
 
Odin544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 3,166
Trader Rating: 93 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goehm View Post
Wow - that's helpful. I was completely wrong and this'll help me get it straight when I start building the kit tomorrow!
When people talk about how much rear tow they run they are always talking per side. I've never seen anyone, anywhere, on any setup sheet call out the included angle (meaning both sides added together). Same goes for camber. You are dealing with one wheel and the measurement is in relation to the centerline of the car when talking toe, or in relation to a vertical axis when talking about camber.
__________________
Xray - ORCA - Avid RC - MaxFX Paint
TriCitiesRC.com
Odin544 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 04:56 AM   #1813
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Default XB4 foams for grippy astro, with Schumacher Mini-pins/spikes ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenny lutz View Post
the red ones are the only ones they make correct.
What foams for grippy astro,
with Schumacher yellow Mini-pins/spikes on dry astro,
blue Mini-pins/spike on wet astro ?

I used Proline Closed cell with yellow mini-pin/spike front and rear with the B44 on dry grippy astro.
But up for other ideas/experiences ? Aka reds ?


On wet astro I felt that the softer Schumacher medium standard foam insert was more grippy than proline closed cell.
Thinking maybe the JConcepts medium closed cell could be perfect, a durable insert ?
Ideas/experiences ?


How would you arrange f.ex these inserts in hardness ?
Proline Closed cell
Aka reds
JConcepts Firm
Jconcepts Medium
anderfa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 08:14 AM   #1814
Tech Addict
 
kenny lutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canal Winchester,OH
Posts: 702
Trader Rating: 36 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anderfa View Post
What foams for grippy astro,
with Schumacher yellow Mini-pins/spikes on dry astro,
blue Mini-pins/spike on wet astro ?

I used Proline Closed cell with yellow mini-pin/spike front and rear with the B44 on dry grippy astro.
But up for other ideas/experiences ? Aka reds ?


On wet astro I felt that the softer Schumacher medium standard foam insert was more grippy than proline closed cell.
Thinking maybe the JConcepts medium closed cell could be perfect, a durable insert ?
Ideas/experiences ?


How would you arrange f.ex these inserts in hardness ?
Proline Closed cell
Aka reds
JConcepts Firm
Jconcepts Medium
I just put the aka red in a set of tires but havent tryied them yet. i believe the are about the same hardness as the the proline blue. i will know more on thursday once i get to run them but im running the stock foams front and rear in another set of wheels and have alot of traction. the other thing i have read is the aka foams will last the longest without breaking down.
__________________
Kyosho Rb6.6- Maclan mmax - Fantom 17.5
Kyosho Zx6.6- Maclan mmax - Fantom 13.5
Airtronics M12 - Auer Ace Hardware - Schelle
kenny lutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 08:25 AM   #1815
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 456
Default

For astro with my fs2 I use answer RC foams in the rear for Schumacher yellow mini spikes. Sometimes use answer RC blue foams in the front too. Sometimes I run aka red in the front.

I'll be using the same starting point re foams no matter what 4wd I run. I do have some aka reds in a set of rears, but rec they're far too hard tbh.

Only other tyres I use ballistic buggy green mini spikes
__________________
Schumacher - RW Racing - RudeBits - TORCH
mikeyscott is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EP buggies thread sim600 Malaysian R/C Racers 3586 03-31-2016 12:53 AM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 05:15 AM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net