Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Sensored VS Sensorless motor >

Sensored VS Sensorless motor

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Sensored VS Sensorless motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2012, 03:57 PM
  #1  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
M03Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 1,190
Trader Rating: 33 (100%+)
Default Sensored VS Sensorless motor

What is the difference between sensored and sensorless motors. Is one better then the other. I'm I gonna see that much difference between the two that I should get the sensorless motor. I have a few sensorless motors and now but I have a chance to pick up a sensored set up for a reasonable price should I buy or stay sensorless set up. Its a duratrax 17.5T sensored motor and hobbywing 60A sensored ESC for about one hundred dollars brand new never used.
M03Racer is offline  
Old 04-24-2012, 04:20 PM
  #2  
Tech Master
iTrader: (14)
 
z50king's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Upland, Cal Poly
Posts: 1,918
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

You are getting what you are paying for with that unused 100 dollar setup

Sensorless only motors are usually made with heavier rotors that are a little slower for the input power.

Sensored motors can offer more timing options than sensorless. Sensorless motors take timing measurements via software. Sensored motors take timing measurements via hardwire sensors. I prefer sensored
z50king is offline  
Old 04-24-2012, 08:32 PM
  #3  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (4)
 
zjguy721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 26
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

For most "faster" applications, you probably won't notice the difference between the two. You will notice a difference at slower speeds, the sensorless motors will start cogging on you, so if you run on a tight track (or especially in a crawler or Wraith type application) you'll want to go sensored.

I run sensored in my Wraith, but sensorless Castles in my Slash and Rustlers and have no issues with them.
zjguy721 is offline  
Old 04-24-2012, 08:41 PM
  #4  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
jsinclair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: rice lake, wi
Posts: 1,036
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

They both have there advantages, in most applications a sensord motor is smoother and can be made faster than its sensor less counterpart. But generally sensor less set ups are more efficient. In mod or open classes I prefer sensor less. But in a boosted 17.5 class a sensor less 2400kv couldn't hold a candle to the sensord 17.5
jsinclair is offline  
Old 04-24-2012, 09:20 PM
  #5  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: auburn
Posts: 276
Default

A real 1409 2400 kv nue motor would be faster than a17.5 sensored boosted or not.
slasn_48 is offline  
Old 04-24-2012, 09:57 PM
  #6  
Tech Prophet
 
tc5 man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: levittown pa
Posts: 16,997
Default

Il be honest i like sensored motors better than sensoredless after running my 2wd slash the sensoredless seems to clog from a stand still more ive noticed from running them.
tc5 man is offline  
Old 04-24-2012, 09:58 PM
  #7  
Tech Master
iTrader: (14)
 
z50king's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Upland, Cal Poly
Posts: 1,918
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by slasn_48
A real 1409 2400 kv nue motor would be faster than a17.5 sensored boosted or not.
I can find nowhere where any useful information is given about these Neu motors. They are sensorless if they are Wye wound
z50king is offline  
Old 04-24-2012, 11:32 PM
  #8  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 623
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by slasn_48
A real 1409 2400 kv nue motor would be faster than a17.5 sensored boosted or not.
How much would that real NEU be compare to the 17.5T?
rc10t3b4 is offline  
Old 04-24-2012, 11:33 PM
  #9  
Tech Master
iTrader: (14)
 
z50king's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Upland, Cal Poly
Posts: 1,918
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rc10t3b4
How much would that real NEU be compare to the 17.5T?
I did find that out!! About 180-200 dollars lol. The 1500 series are more!
z50king is offline  
Old 04-25-2012, 12:21 AM
  #10  
Tech Champion
 
Pulse_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 5,100
Default

sensored >>>> sensorless any time, unless you just bash

I did many testings in 1/8 and 1/10 racing applications and sensored provides a better feel and performances, much smoother.
Pulse_ is offline  
Old 04-25-2012, 12:37 AM
  #11  
Tech Master
iTrader: (14)
 
z50king's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Upland, Cal Poly
Posts: 1,918
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Pulse_
sensored >>>> sensorless any time, unless you just bash

I did many testings in 1/8 and 1/10 racing applications and sensored provides a better feel and performances, much smoother.
I agree with you.

Sensored is also able to give larger amounts of timing. If the software is programmed correctly, the sensorless timing will be more precise up to the limit of timing that it can apply, but the Sensored motor will out time the sensorless motor and thus be faster overall if set up correctly
z50king is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.