Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Durango DEX210 Thread >

Durango DEX210 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree80Likes

Durango DEX210 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2012, 11:20 PM
  #6346  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (43)
 
aloksatoor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N California
Posts: 3,152
Trader Rating: 43 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by SLOWINSLOWOUT
Thats cool, whatever works for you Just saying, that from an engineering point of view, something that is triangulated will be more ridged than something that is boxed. The Ti may be strong, but the assembly is only as strong as the weakest part, in this case, the ball cups. The plastic OEM part, with much more surface area under a clamping load from the multiple fasteners, will be stronger in compression and tension, and much stronger in torsional loading. The ball cup link design will have no torsional strength at all due to the balls. That being said, the increased flex (torsional) should be a good thing on low traction surfaces.
Agreed on all but the torsional rigidity. I tried to twist the chassis to see if the ball cups would pop. The chassis is too narrow I think to offer any flex at all. I was thinking in fact to mount the chassis ball stud on the edge of the plastic pods where those 2 screws are (on each side to mount the bottom brace) to fix potential chassis issues. I have link rod ends instead of the ball cups for that. Will test this layout first though.

I am waiting for a carbon sheet from china, lets see if I can fashion a cleaner and better brace .
aloksatoor is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 02:24 AM
  #6347  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (51)
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 954
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Azagar
New Cream brass bulkhead installed, and a top view of my layout.
They were somehow flipped upside down when uploaded.
I'm reading about these weights a lot and not sure what they do (besides add weight). Is this to help balance the car or give you more steering?
Garnold is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 03:04 AM
  #6348  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (43)
 
aloksatoor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N California
Posts: 3,152
Trader Rating: 43 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Garnold
I'm reading about these weights a lot and not sure what they do (besides add weight). Is this to help balance the car or give you more steering?
Its supposed to give you more tuning options. More weight on axles, wt forward/backward basically to suit your driving style. I personally will not buy those, cheaper and better to buy balancing weights and stick it on the chassis (you can get a lot for 2$ in harbor freight just ask for wheel balancing weights). If you are using full stick pack, then the car is already too heavy. Makes more sense to use the weights on a plastic chassis or with a shorty pack or so.
aloksatoor is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 03:56 AM
  #6349  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (51)
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 954
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by aloksatoor
Its supposed to give you more tuning options. More weight on axles, wt forward/backward basically to suit your driving style. I personally will not buy those, cheaper and better to buy balancing weights and stick it on the chassis (you can get a lot for 2$ in harbor freight just ask for wheel balancing weights). If you are using full stick pack, then the car is already too heavy. Makes more sense to use the weights on a plastic chassis or with a shorty pack or so.
OK makes sense. Right now I'm running full stick packs or saddle packs (which are pretty much just full sticks on this car correct?).

I've been seeing some $49.00 adds for shorties here on this site and might go pick up two to play around with.

What I was amazed by was the fact that I ran my 4800mAh GensAce saddle packs for what felt like forever! I'm so used to the batteries losing power faster on my 4wd SCT. Big difference with a little 2wd buggy
Garnold is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 04:54 AM
  #6350  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (125)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 2,926
Trader Rating: 125 (100%+)
Default

Good times yest at Stateline R/C in Fremont, IN. 215 entries for the Factory Tracks Midwest series! Long day with 23 heats in each round. Ended up locking up TQ after 3 rounds of qualifying in stock buggy. Unfortunetly rains came heavy after the last heat. Race was called, but I left satisfied with a TQ.
DEX210 was dialed still dialed as the track became extremely rough and rutted towards the end of the day with. RM4 gear gave me traction others didn't. As you can see in pics track was built for 1/8.
I will post setup if anyone is interested.

No broken parts ALL day!
No popped ball cups. (kit)
No broken rear camber link mount/gearbox.
No broken front or rear kit towers.
No gear diff.
Did I mention this car is durable?




kwiksi is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 05:11 AM
  #6351  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (51)
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 954
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)
Default

That is just killer man! I'm so glad o bought this buggy.
Garnold is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 05:25 AM
  #6352  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (79)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenvill, NC
Posts: 7,267
Trader Rating: 79 (99%+)
Default

Originally Posted by kwiksi
Good times yest at Stateline R/C in Fremont, IN. 215 entries for the Factory Tracks Midwest series! Long day with 23 heats in each round. Ended up locking up TQ after 3 rounds of qualifying in stock buggy. Unfortunetly rains came heavy after the last heat. Race was called, but I left satisfied with a TQ.
DEX210 was dialed still dialed as the track became extremely rough and rutted towards the end of the day with. RM4 gear gave me traction others didn't. As you can see in pics track was built for 1/8.
I will post setup if anyone is interested.

No broken parts ALL day!
No popped ball cups. (kit)
No broken rear camber link mount/gearbox.
No broken front or rear kit towers.
No gear diff.
Did I mention this car is durable?




Looks good Dave. We need to get you in the big boy class 2wd Mod... That track would be killer with a nice SP V3.0 6.5 in it..
Raul Garcia is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 05:28 AM
  #6353  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (79)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenvill, NC
Posts: 7,267
Trader Rating: 79 (99%+)
Default

Aloksatoor,
some good ideas there. But the plastic chassis brace is adequate. Why did you choose to remove it? My car has been on the shelf for a few weeks. I am waiting for the SP Reventon's coming out eventually. Once they are here I will be back trackside test all sorts of stuff. Youll see..
Raul Garcia is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 07:15 AM
  #6354  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: LA, Cali
Posts: 411
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Need help- when the car is on the ground and I pull the throttle, the car squeal as if the ball diff is slipping the car won't move at all. The motor and spur gear are spinning just fine. When I lift the wheels off the ground, the wheels/tires spin?

I've tried to tighten and lossen the diff...neither works, what could be the problem?
GuiltyByAssoc is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 07:15 AM
  #6355  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 51
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Has anyone run orion 5500 carbon pro's with this car? Or is it really worth shelling out the cash for some shorties?
Shins is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 07:35 AM
  #6356  
Tech Master
iTrader: (57)
 
BOLISARIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S. Corona
Posts: 1,762
Trader Rating: 57 (100%+)
Default

What's the consensus on the longer rear shock shafts? The 210 is the only kit that comes with 55mm rears and the rest,including the DESC410R come with the 52mm shafts stock. I have some black Ti 52mm rear shafts on hand, do I tighten the shock ends all the way in or back out around 3mm to keep the same length as the stockers?
BOLISARIO is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 08:11 AM
  #6357  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 939
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by GuiltyByAssoc
Need help- when the car is on the ground and I pull the throttle, the car squeal as if the ball diff is slipping the car won't move at all. The motor and spur gear are spinning just fine. When I lift the wheels off the ground, the wheels/tires spin?

I've tried to tighten and lossen the diff...neither works, what could be the problem?

The circlip in the diff could have come out possibly.
Could also be the slipper.

I have read (back a few pages I think) that apparently something wears on the top shaft which causes a similar issue, no idea what it is that supposedly wears though.

Originally Posted by BOLISARIO
What's the consensus on the longer rear shock shafts? The 210 is the only kit that comes with 55mm rears and the rest,including the DESC410R come with the 52mm shafts stock. I have some black Ti 52mm rear shafts on hand, do I tighten the shock ends all the way in or back out around 3mm to keep the same length as the stockers?
I asked this question on another forum (and here aswell, got no replies though).

I too thought it was odd, and still do.
It seems they used the same body as the 410 but with a longer shaft.
If your arms don't have the recess for the droop screw, they shock is too long, but if they do and you can get full droop (or take the droop screws out), they shock is then the perfect length.
The 210 I think should have had a longer body.
The piston will clear the top of the shock body with the longer shaft (will hit the shock cap on full compression).
Just put the shaft end on as far as you can, no need to have it any longer.
Shimmy is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 08:26 AM
  #6358  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
SLOWINSLOWOUT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Kelowna, BC
Posts: 889
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by aloksatoor
Agreed on all but the torsional rigidity. I tried to twist the chassis to see if the ball cups would pop. The chassis is too narrow I think to offer any flex at all. I was thinking in fact to mount the chassis ball stud on the edge of the plastic pods where those 2 screws are (on each side to mount the bottom brace) to fix potential chassis issues. I have link rod ends instead of the ball cups for that. Will test this layout first though.

I am waiting for a carbon sheet from china, lets see if I can fashion a cleaner and better brace .
Its just theory based on observation. Testing will tell. Do you know about this place for carbon sheets? Ive not ordered from them, but they are in the US, prices good, and product is good. LINK
SLOWINSLOWOUT is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 08:42 AM
  #6359  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (166)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 4,595
Trader Rating: 166 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by kwiksi
Good times yest at Stateline R/C in Fremont, IN. 215 entries for the Factory Tracks Midwest series! Long day with 23 heats in each round. Ended up locking up TQ after 3 rounds of qualifying in stock buggy. Unfortunetly rains came heavy after the last heat. Race was called, but I left satisfied with a TQ.
DEX210 was dialed still dialed as the track became extremely rough and rutted towards the end of the day with. RM4 gear gave me traction others didn't. As you can see in pics track was built for 1/8.
I will post setup if anyone is interested.

No broken parts ALL day!
No popped ball cups. (kit)
No broken rear camber link mount/gearbox.
No broken front or rear kit towers.
No gear diff.
Did I mention this car is durable?




Hells yeah it is durable. I love mine and will not drive anything else. As soon as the ST isa released im on that as well. Cannot wait to have a full Durango fleet, Just wish 4 wheel drive buggy was popular here as I have seen a few 410's and they look dialed as well. Will not drive Short Bus. Definately post a setup, everyone should, All of the setup sheets we have apart from mine are mostly european, and mostly mod. Building a car for stock (my class) is very different then building a car for mod. Especially post your gearing setup, im sure it would be greatly appreciated for those struggling with gearing.
jpcopeland1 is offline  
Old 06-03-2012, 08:49 AM
  #6360  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (166)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 4,595
Trader Rating: 166 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by BOLISARIO
What's the consensus on the longer rear shock shafts? The 210 is the only kit that comes with 55mm rears and the rest,including the DESC410R come with the 52mm shafts stock. I have some black Ti 52mm rear shafts on hand, do I tighten the shock ends all the way in or back out around 3mm to keep the same length as the stockers?
Screw them all the way in to reduce rear droop. The 55mm shafts cause way too much droop and possible drive shaft binding at full compression, beleive me, I have way more then enough droop at 52mm. Im thinking about taking some out since they are going through a rebuild at OC/RC and the track will be very smooth for the first week or so. More droop for rutted bumpy tracks, less droop for smooth flowing tracks. I bought the black ones too, Im bored with gold shock shafts
jpcopeland1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.