Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
4WD buggy - best for brushlees and lipos? >

4WD buggy - best for brushlees and lipos?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

4WD buggy - best for brushlees and lipos?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2007, 07:24 PM
  #1  
Tech Initiate
Thread Starter
 
joffacn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Panyu, Guangzhou, China
Posts: 38
Default 4WD buggy - best for brushlees and lipos?

Hi

I have all brushless and lipos in my helis and planes so I want to start off this way in my buggy.

Do any of the top 4WD buggies stand out because they are easier to fit a Brushless and Lipos? That is they are more lipo and brushless ready.

It seems that the brushless ESC's are BIG so harder to find room and there are 3 (or 4) wires from motor to ESC.

Saddle pack lipos are available so no real problem with the 3+3 layout.

What about weight distribution? All current buggies are designed for SubC packs which are more than 100gm heavier for the same mAh capacity (4900).

What thoughts?

Thanks Jeff
joffacn is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 07:31 PM
  #2  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
 
Drift_Buggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,662
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Jconcepts BJ4 (not the WE) and Losi XXX-4 G+ use stick packs whereas most of the rest use saddle packs

Cheers
Drift_Buggy is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 07:54 PM
  #3  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
foolio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 732
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by joffacn
Hi

I have all brushless and lipos in my helis and planes so I want to start off this way in my buggy.

Do any of the top 4WD buggies stand out because they are easier to fit a Brushless and Lipos? That is they are more lipo and brushless ready.

It seems that the brushless ESC's are BIG so harder to find room and there are 3 (or 4) wires from motor to ESC.

Saddle pack lipos are available so no real problem with the 3+3 layout.

What about weight distribution? All current buggies are designed for SubC packs which are more than 100gm heavier for the same mAh capacity (4900).

What thoughts?

Thanks Jeff
You can get saddle packs as well as stick packs to fit all types of 4WD cars nowadays.

Saddle packs: www.maxamps.com
Stick packs: orion, maxamps, others.

Just search around. Good luck.
foolio is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 08:01 PM
  #4  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
 
Drift_Buggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,662
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Sorry read it wrong, thought he said he already had lipo stick batteries.
The xx-4 is a saddle pack chassis but you can still put a stick battery in.


Cheers
Drift_Buggy is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 11:55 PM
  #5  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (29)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,668
Trader Rating: 29 (97%+)
Default

To be honest, I would try to pair him with the most durable buggy on the market. I do not know 4wd buggies very well, but when you run lipo/brushless I would think that running the most durable buggy possible would be the way to go. Your ultimate goal when you run brushless lipo is to put a car on the track that can survive a 20 minute main. 1/10th trucks are the only vehicles that people seem to have success w/ for brushless/lipo because of thermaling problems. I believe some well placed scoops from oocrcracing.com would fix this problem. I also think that finding a buggy suited for a stick pack is your best choice. stick lipos are just plain cheaper and hold more capacity because of how they are built. I also think a shaft drive buggy will pay divedends because they require less maintanance. Not to mention make sure you get something that you can get parts for at a cheap price localy.
party_wagon is offline  
Old 02-10-2007, 12:07 AM
  #6  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
 
Drift_Buggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,662
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by party_wagon
To be honest, I would try to pair him with the most durable buggy on the market. I do not know 4wd buggies very well, but when you run lipo/brushless I would think that running the most durable buggy possible would be the way to go. Your ultimate goal when you run brushless lipo is to put a car on the track that can survive a 20 minute main. 1/10th trucks are the only vehicles that people seem to have success w/ for brushless/lipo because of thermaling problems. I believe some well placed scoops from oocrcracing.com would fix this problem. I also think that finding a buggy suited for a stick pack is your best choice. stick lipos are just plain cheaper and hold more capacity because of how they are built. I also think a shaft drive buggy will pay divedends because they require less maintanance. Not to mention make sure you get something that you can get parts for at a cheap price localy.
Nicely said and the only 4wd buggy that comes to mind is the first Jconcetps BJ4 (the one before the WE)
http://www.jconcepts.net/shop/produc...products_id/28


Cheers
Drift_Buggy is offline  
Old 02-10-2007, 04:40 AM
  #7  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,380
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

Academys SB V2 series of buggies has proven to be quite durable and they soon have a pro model coming out that should really up the ante. They also are having success with the buggy especially considering there team is really just starting out.

I think the main thing concerning lipo ( I am thinking the same thing if I get back into electric) is that the weight difference from a standard nimh pack and a lipo is significant. So if the cells are running down 1 side of the chassis ala stick pack, you may have an imbalance in weight, so you will need to add weight to that side. Even if using a saddle setup, there still would be weight change from front to rear.
Cain is offline  
Old 02-10-2007, 11:49 AM
  #8  
Tech Master
iTrader: (77)
 
frankiecmgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Back in Mass !!!
Posts: 1,316
Trader Rating: 77 (100%+)
Default

DRIFT-BUGGY....
THANKS BRO..I FEEL HONORED THAT YOU USED A PIC OF MY XX4 AS A EXAMPLE.....
frankiecmgt is offline  
Old 02-10-2007, 03:02 PM
  #9  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
 
Drift_Buggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,662
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by frankiecmgt
DRIFT-BUGGY....
THANKS BRO..I FEEL HONORED THAT YOU USED A PIC OF MY XX4 AS A EXAMPLE.....
lol, no worries Found it on losibk2.com

Cheers
Drift_Buggy is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 10:18 AM
  #10  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: C-bus Ohio
Posts: 81
Default

I have ran a XXX4 all of this indoor season and recently got rid of it. It is a real drivers car vs. some of the other 4wheelers out there in my opinion. everytime i put my losi on the track it broke something, this weekend a buddy let me run his zx5 and after 2 full packs threw it no probs.. These are the only 2 wheelers i have gotten to drive but of the 2 the Ky. is a more durable/easier to drive car in my opinion.
The xxx4 was very easy to maintain i think, the belt was simple to care for as long as you have the tension and slipper adjustments set correctly. I didnt get to wrench on the Kyosho so i cant help on ease of wrenching on it.
FowLer is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 10:50 AM
  #11  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (44)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 907
Trader Rating: 44 (100%+)
Default

I run the jconcepts BJ4WE w/ saddle pack lipos and mamba max 5700 with no problem at all. I don't even need to add any weight to the rear, although I did soften the rear suspension a tad.
mattnin is offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 01:20 PM
  #12  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
 
Drift_Buggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,662
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by FowLer
I have ran a XXX4 all of this indoor season and recently got rid of it. It is a real drivers car vs. some of the other 4wheelers out there in my opinion. everytime i put my losi on the track it broke something, this weekend a buddy let me run his zx5 and after 2 full packs threw it no probs.. These are the only 2 wheelers i have gotten to drive but of the 2 the Ky. is a more durable/easier to drive car in my opinion.
The xxx4 was very easy to maintain i think, the belt was simple to care for as long as you have the tension and slipper adjustments set correctly. I didnt get to wrench on the Kyosho so i cant help on ease of wrenching on it.
Was it a XXX-4 or G+? Was it fully stock & what parts where you breaking?

Cheers
Drift_Buggy is offline  
Old 02-17-2007, 08:24 AM
  #13  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Jeffersonville, IN
Posts: 259
Default

I hear that the 4wd class cars break easier. I have a XX-4 with a Velociti 5.5 in it, but I'm waiting to buy a reciever and get some batteries made. I hope I'm not breaking stuff that often. Seems like everytime I take my XXX-T out something breaks.
Brushless Corey is offline  
Old 02-17-2007, 12:20 PM
  #14  
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
 
Cain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 34,380
Trader Rating: 294 (100%+)
Default

Thing to remember is that with more moving parts, you have more things that can break. But, I think people also need to remember that by default mod is the class 4wd is ran in. So if all you are running is mod, when you hit something at those speeds, its going to break easier than what you see in stock and 19 turn. I would say durability can be right up there with 2wd if speeds are equal, maybe better.
Cain is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.