R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2006, 06:48 AM   #61
Tech Addict
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the beach australia
Posts: 707
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)

Originally Posted by tex1
The Losi Eight should prove good for how the diffs act when the weight of the car is shifting from side to side. It will change directions quickly and will carry speed very well. After driving the JRXS I believe this to be true.
The front drive shaft has been proven. See all front drives in 1/8 cars. They run straight or at an angle. It won't be a problem.
This ccar will not have the chassis roll of the others where their weight is distributed away from the center.
Mine is on order.
the jrxs was one of losi's biggest flops so lets hope the 8 is not the same. will it be able to compete & be as reliable as the other's? will have to wait & see.

i'm in possesion of both the x1cr & the hyper 8, but am yet to drive the hyper 8 on track. i'll be doing some track time with the hyper 8 on sunday & will post my thoughts once this is done.
flysti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 06:49 AM   #62
Tech Elite
Horatio's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,055

Originally Posted by Davidka
A buddy of mine at work has a Japenese newspaper ad for some kind of drink with Japenese characters all over it and a guy holding the drink. The guy has a speech bubble next to him (looking all excited) that says in English: "When mouth goes happy, all time yummy".

I can't keep a straight face whenever I see that.
Yeah, that's pretty funny - but how do you explain to people why!! It just is!


In the UK, we pronounce Hobao 'ho'-'bay'-'oh'.

The way it often get's spelt in the US it would be pronounced 'ho'-'bo'-'ah'.

And isn't a 'How Bow' a type of musical instrument?
Horatio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 07:27 AM   #63
Tech Champion
Davidka's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,511
Trader Rating: 72 (100%+)

I think the mistake of the JRXS was that they basically prototyped the car in the hands of the consumers. It's not without a fair number of big wins though. The centralized mass will be a bigger benefit on a vehicle with long, soft suspension than one with 5-10mm of stiff travel. This is proven in 1/10th off road where virtually every battery configuration has been tried in 2wd and it always comes back to batteries down the center.
"I have no idea what you're talking about, so here's a bunny with a pancake on it's head."

In mind and body, we're all heading towards old age. It is slower to go by bike.
Davidka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 09:09 AM   #64
Tech Elite
Horatio's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,055

I like the idea of a better weight distribution on 1/8th buggies, but I'm fairly certain that the concept of moving everything over and having the centre drive train off centre has already been considered by the other designers out there. There must be a reason why they all follow the current configuration.

But maybe, it's just lack of innovation?

I often wondered why the transmission couldn't be re-designed around a truely mid engined buggy and concluded that compromises of the drive train would negate any beneficial effects of a more centralised engine.

Of the 3 possible solutions I could think of here were the downsides:

Off centre drive line -

A wider chassis, wider gearbox, shorter wishbones thus suspension compromised.


Extra idler to turn input pinion on diff:

Same problems as above plus greater rotating mass, lower efficiency and greater weight.

Keep the gearboxes similar to other designs, but make the angle of the centre driveshafts more acute:

Efficiency is compromised, along with wear on the CVD/Universal joints.

I can't wait to see how Losi got around these significant engineering problems.

If it turns out that Losi have got it right, very shortly there are going to be alot of Vacancies for CAD operators with the likes of Mugen, Xray, Kyosho, Hobao etc........ For anyone interested out there, I've got a City & Guilds in 4351 AutoCAD.
Horatio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 10:36 AM   #65
Tech Addict
Crim3Wav3's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MasshoL3
Posts: 715
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)

Well, I'll take you to school in SolidWorks. For that matter, Pro-E too.

Any of the Major 3 out there lloking for a CAD Jockey?

I AM !
Crim3Wav3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2006, 10:41 AM   #66
Tech Elite
macnkitty2002's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 4,915
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)

uhh huhh...
macnkitty2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 06:35 AM   #67
Tech Master
performula's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CO
Posts: 1,621
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)

The Jammin is a Kanai 3 copy? That is interesting. Who has the cheapest price on the Jammin RTR?
performula is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hobao Hyper 8 Pro FS revt1 R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 3 04-24-2007 07:26 AM
Hobao Hyper 12 Chancellor6630 Onroad Nitro Engine Zone 0 05-17-2006 05:25 AM
GV REX-X Pro or HoBao Hyper PBS PCR Pro! Undies Electric Off-Road 8 03-19-2006 02:46 PM
Hobao Hyper GP4 bboytab Nitro On-Road 4 11-14-2004 09:35 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -7. It is currently 10:28 AM.

Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.0