XX-4 vs XXX-4
04-11-2006, 09:30 PM
#1
XX-4 vs XXX-4
some people say that the XX-4 handles better in the rough? any detail how and why?
04-11-2006, 10:17 PM
#2
Tech Master
iTrader: (14)
many people will have different thoughts on this, but they will all have some truth to them.
One that I have heard quite a bit is this: the xx-4 was designed as an off road car first and foremost. The xxx-4 was derived from an on road platform (xxx-s).
And at the time when the xxx-4 was being designed, many tracks around the US were blue groove, smooth and high bite, as many are still today.
One that I have heard quite a bit is this: the xx-4 was designed as an off road car first and foremost. The xxx-4 was derived from an on road platform (xxx-s).
And at the time when the xxx-4 was being designed, many tracks around the US were blue groove, smooth and high bite, as many are still today.
04-12-2006, 01:15 AM
#3
Tech Initiate
This article at: http://www.oople.com/rc/photos/reviewxx4/index.html is very well written, and may answer your questions.
04-12-2006, 02:55 AM
#4
Originally Posted by zero74
This article at: http://www.oople.com/rc/photos/reviewxx4/index.html is very well written, and may answer your questions.
04-12-2006, 02:12 PM
#5
04-12-2006, 03:12 PM
#6
The xx-4 handles better, but the xxx-4 has a more effecicient drive train. The motor and battery technology of today has surpassed that necesary to make the effeciency in the xxx-4 beneficial. I would go with the xx-4. However, the xx-4 requires lots of maintanance. Those belts require a whole lot of work and cleaning. If there is parts support for a shaft drive 4wd buggy at your lhs then I would consider looking into one instead of the xx-4.
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
